Literature DB >> 28074563

A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings.

Alexander J Cowell1, William N Dowd2, Justin Landwehr, Carolina Barbosa2, Jeremy W Bray3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Screening and brief intervention for harmful substance use in medical settings is being promoted heavily in the United States. To justify service provision fiscally, the field needs accurate estimates of the number and type of staff required to provide services, and thus the time taken to perform activities used to deliver services. This study analyzed the time spent in activities for the component services of the substance misuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) program implemented in emergency departments, in-patient units and ambulatory clinics.
DESIGN: Observers timed activities according to 18 distinct codes among SBIRT practitioners.
SETTING: Twenty-six US sites within four grantees. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and one practitioner-patient interactions; 63 SBIRT practitioners. MEASUREMENTS: Timing of practitioner activities.
INTERVENTIONS: Delivery of component services of SBIRT.
FINDINGS: The mean (standard error) time to deliver services was 1:19 (0:06) for a pre-screen (n = 210), 4:28 (0:24) for a screen (n = 97) and 6:51 (0:38) for a brief intervention (n = 66). Estimates of service duration varied by setting. Overall, practitioners spent 40% of their time supporting SBIRT delivery to patients and 13% of their time delivering services.
CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, support activities (e.g. reviewing the patient's chart, locating the patient, writing case-notes) for substance abuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment require more staff time than delivery of services. Support time for screens and brief interventions in the emergency department/trauma setting was high compared with the out-patient setting.
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; screening and brief intervention; substance misuse; time and motion study

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074563     DOI: 10.1111/add.13659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  3 in total

1.  Start-Up Costs of SBIRT Implementation for Adolescents in Urban U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Carolina Barbosa; Brendan Wedehase; Laura Dunlap; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Kristi Dusek; Robert P Schwartz; Jan Gryzcynski; Arethusa S Kirk; Marla Oros; Colleen Hosler; Kevin E O'Grady; Barry S Brown
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Cost-effectiveness of electronic- and clinician-delivered screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment for women in reproductive health centers.

Authors:  Todd A Olmstead; Kimberly A Yonkers; Steven J Ondersma; Ariadna Forray; Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden; Steve Martino
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Cost and cost-effectiveness of three strategies for implementing motivational interviewing for substance misuse on medical inpatient units.

Authors:  Todd A Olmstead; Kimberly A Yonkers; Ariadna Forray; Paula Zimbrean; Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden; Steve Martino
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.492

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.