Literature DB >> 29885153

Start-Up Costs of SBIRT Implementation for Adolescents in Urban U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Carolina Barbosa1, Brendan Wedehase2, Laura Dunlap2, Shannon Gwin Mitchell3, Kristi Dusek3, Robert P Schwartz3, Jan Gryzcynski3, Arethusa S Kirk4, Marla Oros5, Colleen Hosler5, Kevin E O'Grady6, Barry S Brown3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the costs to implement Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for adolescent substance use in primary care settings is important for providers in planning for services and for decision makers considering dissemination and widespread implementation of SBIRT. We estimated the start-up costs of two models of SBIRT for adolescents in a multisite U.S. Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). In both models, screening was performed by a medical assistant, but models differed on delivery of brief intervention, with brief intervention delivered by a primary care provider in the generalist model and a behavioral health specialist in the specialist model.
METHOD: SBIRT was implemented at seven clinics in a multisite, cluster randomized trial. SBIRT implementation costs were calculated using an activity-based costing methodology. Start-up activities were defined as (a) planning activities (e.g., changing existing electronic medical record system and tailoring service delivery protocols); and (b) initial staff training. Data collection instruments were developed to collect staff time spent in start-up activities and quantity of nonlabor resources used.
RESULTS: The estimated average costs to implement SBIRT were $5,182 for the specialist model and $3,920 for the generalist model. Planning activities had the greatest impact on costs for both models. Overall, more resources were devoted to planning and training activities in specialist sites, making the specialist model costlier to implement.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial investment required to implement SBIRT should not be neglected. The level of resources necessary for initial implementation depends on the delivery model and its integration into current practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29885153      PMCID: PMC6005259          DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  34 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department.

Authors:  Anthony Spirito; Peter M Monti; Nancy P Barnett; Suzanne M Colby; Holly Sindelar; Damaris J Rohsenow; William Lewander; Mark Myers
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department.

Authors:  P M Monti; S M Colby; N P Barnett; A Spirito; D J Rohsenow; M Myers; R Woolard; W Lewander
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-12

3.  Teen reach: outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial of a tobacco reduction program for teens seen in primary medical care.

Authors:  Jack F Hollis; Michael R Polen; Evelyn P Whitlock; Edward Lichtenstein; John P Mullooly; Wayne F Velicer; Colleen A Redding
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings.

Authors:  Duane F Reinert; John P Allen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Costs of alcohol screening and brief intervention in medical settings: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jeremy W Bray; Gary A Zarkin; Jesse M Hinde; Michael J Mills
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Effects of a brief intervention for reducing violence and alcohol misuse among adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maureen A Walton; Stephen T Chermack; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Marc A Zimmerman; Frederic C Blow; Rebecca M Cunningham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Validity of brief alcohol screening tests among adolescents: a comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT.

Authors:  John R Knight; Lon Sherritt; Sion Kim Harris; Elizabeth C Gates; Grace Chang
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments.

Authors:  Brady P Horn; Cameron Crandall; Alyssa Forcehimes; Michael T French; Michael Bogenschutz
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-05-04

9.  The adolescent cannabis check-up: randomized trial of a brief intervention for young cannabis users.

Authors:  Greg Martin; Jan Copeland
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-09-14

10.  Program- and service-level costs of seven screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment programs.

Authors:  Jeremy W Bray; Erin Mallonee; William Dowd; Arnie Aldridge; Alexander J Cowell; Janice Vendetti
Journal:  Subst Abuse Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Costs and Implementation Effectiveness of Generalist Versus Specialist Models for Adolescent Screening and Brief Intervention in Primary Care.

Authors:  Carolina Barbosa; Alexander Cowell; Laura Dunlap; Brendan Wedehase; Kristi Dušek; Robert P Schwartz; Jan Gryczynski; Alan Barnosky; Arethusa S Kirk; Marla Oros; Colleen Hosler-Moore; Kevin E O'Grady; Barry S Brown; Shannon Gwin Mitchell
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.582

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.