Literature DB >> 28070721

Enhanced xylose fermentation by engineered yeast expressing NADH oxidase through high cell density inoculums.

Guo-Chang Zhang1,2, Timothy L Turner2, Yong-Su Jin3,4.   

Abstract

Accumulation of reduced byproducts such as glycerol and xylitol during xylose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae hampers the economic production of biofuels and chemicals from cellulosic hydrolysates. In particular, engineered S. cerevisiae expressing NADPH-linked xylose reductase (XR) and NAD+-linked xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) produces substantial amounts of the reduced byproducts under anaerobic conditions due to the cofactor difference of XR and XDH. While the additional expression of a water-forming NADH oxidase (NoxE) from Lactococcus lactis in engineered S. cerevisiae with the XR/XDH pathway led to reduced glycerol and xylitol production and increased ethanol yields from xylose, volumetric ethanol productivities by the engineered yeast decreased because of growth defects from the overexpression of noxE. In this study, we introduced noxE into an engineered yeast strain (SR8) exhibiting near-optimal xylose fermentation capacity. To overcome the growth defect caused by the overexpression of noxE, we used a high cell density inoculum for xylose fermentation by the SR8 expressing noxE. The resulting strain, SR8N, not only showed a higher ethanol yield and lower byproduct yields, but also exhibited a high ethanol productivity during xylose fermentation. As noxE overexpression elicits a negligible growth defect on glucose conditions, the beneficial effects of noxE overexpression were substantial when a mixture of glucose and xylose was used. Consumption of glucose led to rapid cell growth and therefore enhanced the subsequent xylose fermentation. As a result, the SR8N strain produced more ethanol and fewer byproducts from a mixture of glucose and xylose than the parental SR8 strain without noxE overexpression. Our results suggest that the growth defects from noxE overexpression can be overcome in the case of fermenting lignocellulose-derived sugars such as glucose and xylose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethanol; High initial cell density; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Xylose fermentation; noxE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28070721     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-016-1899-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  48 in total

1.  Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria, the combined approach: kinetic modelling, metabolic control and experimental analysis.

Authors:  Marcel H N Hoefnagel; Marjo J C Starrenburg; Dirk E Martens; Jeroen Hugenholtz; Michiel Kleerebezem; Iris I Van Swam; Roger Bongers; Hans V Westerhoff; Jacky L Snoep
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose.

Authors:  N W Ho; Z Chen; A P Brainard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparative metabolic network analysis of two xylose fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Thomas Grotkjaer; Paul Christakopoulos; Jens Nielsen; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.783

4.  Conversion of xylose to ethanol by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae: importance of xylulokinase (XKS1) and oxygen availability.

Authors:  M H Toivari; A Aristidou; L Ruohonen; M Penttilä
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.783

5.  High-level functional expression of a fungal xylose isomerase: the key to efficient ethanolic fermentation of xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

Authors:  Marko Kuyper; Harry R Harhangi; Ann Kristin Stave; Aaron A Winkler; Mike S M Jetten; Wim T A M de Laat; Jan J J den Ridder; Huub J M Op den Camp; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Cofactor engineering: a novel approach to metabolic engineering in Lactococcus lactis by controlled expression of NADH oxidase.

Authors:  F Lopez de Felipe; M Kleerebezem; W M de Vos; J Hugenholtz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Effect of the reversal of coenzyme specificity by expression of mutated Pichia stipitis xylitol dehydrogenase in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J Hou; Y Shen; X P Li; X M Bao
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.858

8.  Engineering redox cofactor regeneration for improved pentose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ritva Verho; John Londesborough; Merja Penttilä; Peter Richard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Soo Rin Kim; Jeffrey M Skerker; Wei Kang; Anastashia Lesmana; Na Wei; Adam P Arkin; Yong-Su Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Altering the coenzyme preference of xylose reductase to favor utilization of NADH enhances ethanol yield from xylose in a metabolically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Barbara Petschacher; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Redox cofactor engineering in industrial microorganisms: strategies, recent applications and future directions.

Authors:  Jiaheng Liu; Huiling Li; Guangrong Zhao; Qinggele Caiyin; Jianjun Qiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Valorisation of xylose to renewable fuels and chemicals, an essential step in augmenting the commercial viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries.

Authors:  Vivek Narisetty; Rylan Cox; Rajesh Bommareddy; Deepti Agrawal; Ejaz Ahmad; Kamal Kumar Pant; Anuj Kumar Chandel; Shashi Kant Bhatia; Dinesh Kumar; Parmeswaran Binod; Vijai Kumar Gupta; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Sustain Energy Fuels       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.367

3.  Improved simultaneous co-fermentation of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulosic biorefinery.

Authors:  Phuong Hoang Nguyen Tran; Ja Kyong Ko; Gyeongtaek Gong; Youngsoon Um; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying phenotypic variation in bioethanol-related processes in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Joshua C Waters; Deval Jhaveri; Justin C Biffinger; Kwangwon Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Xylo-Oligosaccharide Utilization by Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Produce Ethanol.

Authors:  Dielle Pierotti Procópio; Emanuele Kendrick; Rosana Goldbeck; André Ricardo de Lima Damasio; Telma Teixeira Franco; David J Leak; Yong-Su Jin; Thiago Olitta Basso
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 6.  Metabolic Engineering of Bacterial Respiration: High vs. Low P/O and the Case of Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  Uldis Kalnenieks; Elina Balodite; Reinis Rutkis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.