Literature DB >> 28070707

Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System-a Design Thinking-Based Approach.

Faiq Shaikh1, Kenneth Hendrata2, Brian Kolowitz2, Omer Awan3, Rasu Shrestha2, Christopher Deible2.   

Abstract

In the era of value-based healthcare, many aspects of medical care are being measured and assessed to improve quality and reduce costs. Radiology adds enormously to health care costs and is under pressure to adopt a more efficient system that incorporates essential metrics to assess its value and impact on outcomes. Most current systems tie radiologists' incentives and evaluations to RVU-based productivity metrics and peer-review-based quality metrics. In a new potential model, a radiologist's performance will have to increasingly depend on a number of parameters that define "value," beginning with peer review metrics that include referrer satisfaction and feedback from radiologists to the referring physician that evaluates the potency and validity of clinical information provided for a given study. These new dimensions of value measurement will directly impact the cascade of further medical management. We share our continued experience with this project that had two components: RESP (Referrer Evaluation System Pilot) and FRACI (Feedback from Radiologist Addressing Confounding Issues), which were introduced to the clinical radiology workflow in order to capture referrer-based and radiologist-based feedback on radiology reporting. We also share our insight into the principles of design thinking as applied in its planning and execution.

Keywords:  Imaging informatics; Quality assurance; Radiology workflow; Total quality management

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28070707      PMCID: PMC5422231          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9940-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  Online Error Reporting for Managing Quality Control Within Radiology.

Authors:  Pedram Golnari; Daniel Forsberg; Beverly Rosipko; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.

Authors:  Annette J Johnson; Jun Ying; J Shannon Swan; Linda S Williams; Kimberly E Applegate; Benjamin Littenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.

Authors:  F M Grieve; A A Plumb; S H Khan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting.

Authors:  Andrew J Gunn; Claude I Alabre; Susan E Bennett; Mira Kautzky; Thalia Krakower; Kerri Palamara; Garry Choy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Evaluating the Referring Physician's Clinical History and Indication as a Means for Communicating Chronic Conditions That Are Pertinent at the Point of Radiologic Interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr Obara; Merlijn Sevenster; Adam Travis; Yuechen Qian; Charles Westin; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Radiology reports: a quantifiable and objective textual approach.

Authors:  J A Scott; E L Palmer
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Effective notification of important non-urgent radiology results: a qualitative study of challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Antonia Hordern; Marion Dimigen; Branimir Zogovic; Joanne Callen; Glen Schlaphoff; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.735

9.  Radiology clinical synopsis: a simple solution for obtaining an adequate clinical history for the accurate reporting of imaging studies on patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen; Khurshaid Alam
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-05-24

10.  Solutions in radiology services management: a literature review.

Authors:  Aline Garcia Pereira; Lizandra Garcia Lupi Vergara; Eugenio Andrés Díaz Merino; Adriano Wagner
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct
View more
  3 in total

1.  Design Thinking to Improve Implementation of Public Health Interventions: An Exploratory Case Study on Enhancing Park Use.

Authors:  Terry T-K Huang; Jonathan Aitken; Emily Ferris; Nevin Cohen
Journal:  Design Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2019-01-16

Review 2.  Multispecialty Enterprise Imaging Workgroup Consensus on Interactive Multimedia Reporting Current State and Road to the Future: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Authors:  Christopher J Roth; David A Clunie; David J Vining; Seth J Berkowitz; Alejandro Berlin; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Shawn D Clark; Toby C Cornish; Monief Eid; Cree M Gaskin; Alexander K Goel; Genevieve C Jacobs; David Kwan; Damien M Luviano; Morgan P McBee; Kelly Miller; Abdul Moiz Hafiz; Ceferino Obcemea; Anil V Parwani; Veronica Rotemberg; Elliot L Silver; Erik S Storm; James E Tcheng; Karen S Thullner; Les R Folio
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  VR/AR Technology in Human Anatomy Teaching and Operation Training.

Authors:  Yuan Zhou; Jiejun Hou; Qi Liu; Xu Chao; Nan Wang; Yu Chen; Jianjun Guan; Qi Zhang; Yongchang Diwu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.