| Literature DB >> 28070286 |
Eline Nayara Dantas da Costa1, Jéssica Carneiro de Souza1, Marilane Andrade Pereira1, Marcelo Friederichs Landim de Souza1, Weber Friederichs Landim de Souza2, Daniela Mariano Lopes da Silva1.
Abstract
Water flow pathways andEntities:
Keywords: Atlantic forest; cacao; carbon; organic matter; watersheds
Year: 2016 PMID: 28070286 PMCID: PMC5216674 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Location map of the microbasins of the preserved forest and of the cacao plantation
Characteristics of the watersheds—preserved forest (PF) and cacao plantation (CP)
| ID | Lat/Long | Class/soil | Area (ha) | Land use | Precipitation (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | Rainy | |||||
| PF | S8401012 W0492289 | Oxisol | 36.08 | Preserved forest | 104.4 | 251.9 |
| CP | S144738.2 W391019.5 | Dystrophic Ultisol | 73.38 | Cacao plantation | 103.2 | 246.8 |
Figure 2Daily rainfall in preserved forest (PF) and cacao plantation (CP) areas
Abiotic variables in the hydrological pathways of the microbasin in the PF (preserved forest) and in the CP (cacao plantation). With P: precipitation, T: throughfall, SF: stemflow, and S: stream. Mean values ± standard deviation; Cond. = electrical conductivity
| Pathway | pH | E. Cond. (μS/cm) |
|---|---|---|
| PF | ||
| P | 6.6 ± 0.4 | 40.9 ± 35.1 |
| T | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 56.8 ± 46.7 |
| SF | 6.8 ± 0.8 | 34.6 ± 12.1 |
| S | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 42.5 ± 5.1 |
| CP | ||
| P | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 39.2 ± 16.7 |
| T | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 68 ± 30.9 |
| SF | 6.2 ± 1.2 | 57 ± 17.7 |
| S | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 102 ± 18.6 |
n: P = 18 e 13; TF = 88 e 74; SF = 21 e 45; S = 16 e 17 (FN e CP, respectively).
Figure 3Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) distribution (mg/L) between dry periods and rainy periods in P: Precipitation, T: Throughfall, SF: Stemflow in volume‐weighted average—VWA, OF: Overland Flow, SS: Soil Solution (15, 45 and 90 cm), and S: Stream. a—Preserved Forest, b—cacao plantation. Different letters indicate different values between dry periods and rainy periods for the statistical Mann‐Whitney U‐test, with a p < .05
Figure 4Annual estimates of DOC in kg ha−1 year−1 in dry and rainy seasons in P: precipitation, T: throughfall, SF: stemflow, OF: overland flow, and S: stream in the preserved forest—PF. The annual fluxes were calculated by equations (3) and (4) (see Section 3)
Figure 5Annual estimates of DOC in kg ha−1 year−1 in dry and rainy seasons in P: precipitation, T: throughfall, SF: stemflow, OF: overland flow, and S: stream in the cacao plantation—CP. The annual fluxes were calculated by equations (3) and (4) (see Section 3)
Stream DOC in relation to overland flow and SS90 during rainy and dry seasons
| PF | CP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OF | SS 90 | OF | SS 90 | |
| Rainy | ||||
| S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Dry | ||||
| S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
PF, preserved forest; CP, cacao plantation.
The r 2 and p‐value represent the simple linear regression between the variables.