| Literature DB >> 28070189 |
Chukwumere E Nwogu1, Martin Mahoney2, Ifeoma Okoye3, Kenneth Ejiogu4, Saby George2, Grace Dy2, Mutiu Jimoh4, Omolola Salako5, Oge Ilegbune4, Bindiya Chugani4, Emmanuel Ezeome3, Abiodun O Popoola6, Arthur M Michalek7.
Abstract
Background. About 65% of cancer deaths globally occur in low to middle income countries (LMICs) where prioritization and allocation of resources to cancer care are often quite poor. In the absence of governmental focus on this problem, public-private partnerships may be an avenue to provide effective cancer control. Methods. This manuscript highlights the establishment of a nongovernmental organization (NGO) to stimulate the development of partnerships between oncology professionals, private enterprise, and academic institutions, both locally and internationally. Examples of capacity building, grant support, establishment of collaborative networks, and the development of a facility to provide clinical care are highlighted. Results. Collaborations were established between oncology professionals at academic institutions in the US and Nigeria. Cancer control workshops were conducted in Nigeria with grant support from the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). A monthly tumor board conference was established at LASUTH in Lagos, and further capacity building is underway with grant support from the United States NCI. An outpatient, privately funded oncology clinic in Lagos has been launched. Conclusion. In LMICs, effective partnership between public and private institutions can lead to tangible strides in cancer control. The use of creative healthcare financing models can also support positive change.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28070189 PMCID: PMC5187464 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7121527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Epidemiol ISSN: 1687-8558
Figure 1Number of new patients evaluated.
Public versus private cancer care.
| Traditional government cancer care | Private cancer center care | |
|---|---|---|
| Location | Within large tertiary university teaching hospitals | In a facility dedicated solely to cancer care |
| Focus | Spread across multiple specialties including general medicine | Specifically on oncology |
| Scope of services | Very broad | Limited to oncology related services |
| Maintenance of facilities | Generally challenging | Easier to accomplish |
| Quality | Limited by local expertise | Enhanced by international telemedicine |
| Administrative model | Large, bureaucratic | Small, nimble |