Literature DB >> 28069542

Hemispheric asymmetries in the transition from action preparation to execution.

Valentina Sulpizio1, Giuliana Lucci2, Marika Berchicci3, Gaspare Galati2, Sabrina Pitzalis4, Francesco Di Russo4.   

Abstract

Flexible and adaptive behavior requires the ability to contextually stop inappropriate actions and select the right one as quickly as possible. Recently, it has been proposed that three brain regions, i.e., the inferior frontal gyrus (iFg), the anterior insula (aIns), and the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPs), play an important role in several processing phases of perceptual decision tasks, especially in the preparation, perception and action phases, respectively. However, little is known about hemispheric differences in the activation of these three areas during the transition from perception to action. Many studies have examined how people prepare to stop upcoming responses through both proactive and reactive inhibitory control. Although inhibitory control has been associated with activity in the right prefrontal cortex (PFC), we have previously reported that, during a discriminative response task performed with the right hand, we observed: 1) a bilateral activity in the iFg during the preparation phase, and 2) a left dominant activity in the aIns and aIPs during the transition from perception to action, i.e., the so-called stimulus-response mapping. To clarify the hemispheric dominance of these processes, we combined the high temporal resolution of event-related potentials (ERPs) with the high spatial resolution of event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants performed a discriminative response task (DRT) and a simple response task (SRT) using their non-dominant left hand. We confirmed that proactive inhibitory control originates in the iFg: its activity started one second before the stimulus onset and was released concomitantly to the stimulus appearance. Most importantly, we confirmed the presence of a bilateral iFg activity that seems to reflect a bilateral proactive control rather than a right-hemisphere dominance or a stronger control of the hemisphere contralateral to the responding hand. Further, we observed a stronger activation of the left aIns and a right-lateralized activation of the aIPs reflecting left-hemisphere dominance for stimulus-response mapping finalized to response execution and a contralateral-hand parietal premotor activity, respectively.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Go/No-Go; Perceptual-decision; Prefrontal cortex; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28069542     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Detailed spatiotemporal brain mapping of chromatic vision combining high-resolution VEP with fMRI and retinotopy.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesca Strappini; Alessandro Bultrini; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision.

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Marika Berchicci; Shehzad A Naroo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Executive Functions and Performance Variability Measured by Event-Related Potentials to Understand the Neural Bases of Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Rinaldo L Perri; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  "Hit the missing stimulus". A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study to localize the generators of endogenous ERPs in an omitted target paradigm.

Authors:  Aldo Ragazzoni; Francesco Di Russo; Serena Fabbri; Ilaria Pesaresi; Andrea Di Rollo; Rinaldo Livio Perri; Davide Barloscio; Tommaso Bocci; Mirco Cosottini; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Low and high stimulation frequencies differentially affect automated response selection in the superior parietal cortex - implications for somatosensory area processes.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evidence for an altered architecture and a hierarchical modulation of inhibitory control processes in ADHD.

Authors:  Witold Chmielewski; Annet Bluschke; Benjamin Bodmer; Nicole Wolff; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Multi-level decoding of task sets in neurophysiological data during cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Vanessa Petruo; Adam Takacs; Moritz Mückschel; Bernhard Hommel; Christian Beste
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-26

8.  Visually evoked responses from the blind field of hemianopic patients.

Authors:  Javier Sanchez-Lopez; Caterina A Pedersini; Francesco Di Russo; Nicolò Cardobi; Cristina Fonte; Valentina Varalta; Massimo Prior; Nicola Smania; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Effects of a Cognitive-Motor Training on Anticipatory Brain Functions and Sport Performance in Semi-Elite Basketball Players.

Authors:  Stefania Lucia; Valentina Bianco; Luca Boccacci; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31

10.  Effect of Exoskeleton-Assisted Rehabilitation Over Prefrontal Cortex in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Neuroimaging Pilot Study.

Authors:  V Sulpizio; M Berchicci; F Di Russo; G Galati; M G Grasso; M Iosa; G Lucci; S Paolucci; M Ripani; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.020

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.