| Literature DB >> 28068938 |
Xiaoyan Han1, Lijuan Wang1,2, Hongfei Shi1, Gaofeng Zheng1, Jingsong He1, Wenjun Wu1, Jimin Shi1, Guoqing Wei1, Weiyan Zheng1, Jie Sun1, He Huang1, Zhen Cai3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) seriously affects the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) as well as the response rate to chemotherapy. Acupuncture has a potential role in the treatment of CIPN, but at present there have been no randomized clinical research studies to analyze the effectiveness of acupuncture for the treatment of CIPN, particularly in MM patients.Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture; CIPN; Methylcobalamin; Multiple myeloma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28068938 PMCID: PMC5223334 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-3037-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Flow chart of the present study
Fig. 2Scheme of acupuncture points on the legs, feet and ventral upper body
Fig. 3Scheme of acupuncture points on the dorsal upper body
Baseline Characteristics of the MM patients
| Characteristic | Met + Acu Group ( | Control Group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 27 | 29* |
| Female | 22 | 20* |
| Age (average) | 62.46 | 65.29* |
| Type | ||
| IgG | 25 | 21* |
| IgA | 13 | 14* |
| IgD | 2 | 3* |
| Light chain (Kappa/lambda) | 9 | 11* |
| PN Grade (CTCAE) | ||
| Grade 2 | 20 | 19* |
| Grade 3 | 25 | 27* |
| Grade 4 | 4 | 3* |
| VAS scores | 5.57 ± 0.26 | 5.50 ± 0.24* |
| FACT/the GOG-Ntx scores | 36.48 ± 0.47 | 36.63 ± 0.55* |
* P > 0.05, compared between the Met + Acu and control groups before therapy
VAS pain scores before and after treatment
| Group |
| Before therapy | After therapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Met + Acu Group | 49 | 5.57 ± 0.257 | 3.23 ± 0.170*** △△ |
| Control Group | 49 | 5.50 ± 0.244 | 4.25 ± 0.197*** |
*** P < 0.001, compared before and after therapy
△△ P < 0.01, compared between the Met + Acu and control groups
FACT/the GOG-Ntx questionnaire scores before and after treatment
| Group |
| Before therapy | After therapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Met + Acu Group | 49 | 36.48 ± 0.470 | 32.98 ± 0.542*** △ |
| Control Group | 49 | 36.63 ± 0.551 | 35.17 ± 0.518 |
*** P < 0.001, compared before and after therapy
△ P < 0.05, compared between the Met + Acu and control groups
Nerve conduction velocity before and after treatment
| Group |
| MCV | SCV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilateral median nerve | Peroneal nerve | Bilateral median nerve | Sural nerve | |||
| Met + Acu group | Before treatment | 49 | 49.81 ± 0.78 | 44.59 ± 0. 78 | 49.58 ± 0.73 | 43.99 ± 0.63 |
| After treatment | 49 | 52.84 ± 0.81* | 47.88 ± 0.67** | 51.51 ± 0.64 | 46.87 ± 0.77**△△ | |
| Control group | Before treatment | 49 | 50.43 ± 0.70 | 45.09 ± 0.71 | 49.98 ± 0.94 | 44.11 ± 0.60 |
| After treatment | 49 | 51.05 ± 0.60 | 45.42 ± 0.76 | 50.40 ± 0.79 | 43.61 ± 0.51 | |
* P < 0.05, compared before and after therapy
** P < 0.01, compared before and after therapy
△△ P < 0.01, compared between the Met + Acu and control groups