Joseph Knapik1,2, Ryan Steelman1. 1. Portfolio of Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance, US Army Public Health Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. 2. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify and analyze articles in which the authors examined risk factors for soldiers during military static-line airborne operations. DATA SOURCES: We searched for articles in PubMed, the Defense Technical Information Center, reference lists, and other sources using the key words airborne, parachuting, parachutes, paratrooper, injuries, wounds, trauma, and musculoskeletal. STUDY SELECTION: The search identified 17 684 potential studies. Studies were included if they were written in English, involved military static-line parachute operations, recorded injuries directly from events on the landing zone or from safety or medical records, and provided data for quantitative assessment of injury risk factors. A total of 23 studies met the review criteria, and 15 were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: The summary statistic obtained for each risk factor was the risk ratio, which was the ratio of the injury risk in 1 group to that of another (baseline) group. Where data were sufficient, meta-analyses were performed and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk factors for static-line parachuting injuries included night jumps, jumps with extra equipment, higher wind speeds, higher air temperatures, jumps from fixed-wing aircraft rather than balloons or helicopters, jumps onto certain types of terrain, being a female paratrooper, greater body weight, not using the parachute ankle brace, smaller parachute canopies, simultaneous exits from both sides of an aircraft, higher heat index, winds from the rear of the aircraft on exit entanglements, less experience with a particular parachute system, being an enlisted soldier rather than an officer, and jumps involving a greater number of paratroopers. CONCLUSIONS: We analyzed and summarized factors that increased the injury risk for soldiers during military static-line parachute operations. Understanding and considering these factors in risk evaluations may reduce the likelihood of injury during parachuting.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and analyze articles in which the authors examined risk factors for soldiers during military static-line airborne operations. DATA SOURCES: We searched for articles in PubMed, the Defense Technical Information Center, reference lists, and other sources using the key words airborne, parachuting, parachutes, paratrooper, injuries, wounds, trauma, and musculoskeletal. STUDY SELECTION: The search identified 17 684 potential studies. Studies were included if they were written in English, involved military static-line parachute operations, recorded injuries directly from events on the landing zone or from safety or medical records, and provided data for quantitative assessment of injury risk factors. A total of 23 studies met the review criteria, and 15 were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: The summary statistic obtained for each risk factor was the risk ratio, which was the ratio of the injury risk in 1 group to that of another (baseline) group. Where data were sufficient, meta-analyses were performed and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk factors for static-line parachuting injuries included night jumps, jumps with extra equipment, higher wind speeds, higher air temperatures, jumps from fixed-wing aircraft rather than balloons or helicopters, jumps onto certain types of terrain, being a female paratrooper, greater body weight, not using the parachute ankle brace, smaller parachute canopies, simultaneous exits from both sides of an aircraft, higher heat index, winds from the rear of the aircraft on exit entanglements, less experience with a particular parachute system, being an enlisted soldier rather than an officer, and jumps involving a greater number of paratroopers. CONCLUSIONS: We analyzed and summarized factors that increased the injury risk for soldiers during military static-line parachute operations. Understanding and considering these factors in risk evaluations may reduce the likelihood of injury during parachuting.
Authors: Joseph J Knapik; Ryan Steelman; Kyle Hoedebecke; Kevin L Klug; Shawn Rankin; Stanley Proctor; Bria Graham; Bruce H Jones Journal: Aviat Space Environ Med Date: 2014-02
Authors: Joseph J Knapik; Ryan Steelman; Kyle Hoedebecke; Shawn Rankin; Kevin Klug; Keith Collier; Bruce H Jones Journal: Aviat Space Environ Med Date: 2014-12
Authors: Robert W Yeh; Linda R Valsdottir; Michael W Yeh; Changyu Shen; Daniel B Kramer; Jordan B Strom; Eric A Secemsky; Joanne L Healy; Robert M Domeier; Dhruv S Kazi; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-12-13
Authors: Stefan Sammito; Vedran Hadzic; Thomas Karakolis; Karen R Kelly; Susan P Proctor; Ainars Stepens; Graham White; Wes O Zimmermann Journal: Mil Med Res Date: 2021-12-10