Literature DB >> 28068126

Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation.

James E Cane1, Heather J Ferguson2, Ian A Apperly3.   

Abstract

Research has demonstrated a link between perspective taking and working memory. Here we used eye tracking to examine the time course with which working memory load (WML) influences perspective-taking ability in a referential communication task and how motivation to take another's perspective modulates these effects. In Experiment 1, where there was no reward or time pressure, listeners only showed evidence of incorporating perspective knowledge during integration of the target object but did not anticipate reference to this common ground object during the pretarget-noun period. WML did not affect this perspective use. In Experiment 2, where a reward for speed and accuracy was applied, listeners used perspective cues to disambiguate the target object from the competitor object from the earliest moments of processing (i.e., during the pretarget-noun period), but only under low load. Under high load, responses were comparable with the control condition, where both objects were in common ground. Furthermore, attempts to initiate perspective-relevant responses under high load led to impaired recall on the concurrent WML task, indicating that perspective-relevant responses were drawing on limited cognitive resources. These results show that when there is ambiguity, perspective cues guide rapid referential interpretation when there is sufficient motivation and sufficient cognitive resources. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28068126     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking.

Authors:  Debby Damen; Marije van Amelsvoort; Per van der Wijst; Monique Pollmann; Emiel Krahmer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Taking the perspectives of many people: Humanization matters.

Authors:  Tian Ye; Fumikazu Furumi; Daniel Catarino da Silva; Antonia Hamilton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12-14

3.  Tracking the impact of depression in a perspective-taking task.

Authors:  Heather J Ferguson; James Cane
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Imagine-Self Perspective-Taking and Rational Self-Interested Behavior in a Simple Experimental Normal-Form Game.

Authors:  Adam Karbowski; Michał Ramsza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  Cognitive and Neuroanatomic Accounts of Referential Communication in Focal Dementia.

Authors:  Meghan Healey; Nicola Spotorno; Christopher Olm; David J Irwin; Murray Grossman
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-09-26

6.  Common Ground Information Affects Reference Resolution: Evidence From Behavioral Data, ERPs, and Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Maria Richter; Mariella Paul; Barbara Höhle; Isabell Wartenburger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-30

7.  Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Heather J Ferguson; Victoria E A Brunsdon; Elisabeth E F Bradford
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The neural basis of belief-attribution across the lifespan: False-belief reasoning and the N400 effect.

Authors:  Elisabeth E F Bradford; Victoria E A Brunsdon; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Why are listeners sometimes (but not always) egocentric? Making inferences about using others' perspective in referential communication.

Authors:  J Jessica Wang; Natalia Ciranova; Bethany Woods; Ian A Apperly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Constructing Others' Beliefs from One's Own Using Medial Frontal Cortex.

Authors:  Nils Kolling; Marius Braunsdorf; Suhas Vijayakumar; Harold Bekkering; Ivan Toni; Rogier B Mars
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.