Literature DB >> 28068113

Perceptions of harm and addiction of snus: An exploratory study.

Annette R Kaufman1, Emily Grenen2, Meredith Grady1, Bryan Leyva3, Rebecca A Ferrer4.   

Abstract

Tobacco companies in the United States are prohibited from making reduced harm claims without filing a modified risk tobacco product application with the Food and Drug Administration and obtaining an order to market as such. However, it is possible that product marketing may suggest reduced risk to individuals. This study examines perceptions, in particular those related to harm and addiction, of snus print advertisements using a combination of eye-tracking, survey, and semistructured interviews. Participants were 22 male smokers ages 19-29 (M = 26.64, SD = 2.92). Five snus advertisements were each displayed for 20 s and eye movements were tracked. Participants responded to questions about harm and addiction after each advertisement and interviews were conducted after seeing all advertisements. For each advertisement, descriptive statistics were calculated and regression analyses predicted harm and addiction perceptions from eye tracking areas of interest (e.g., warning label). Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive/deductive thematic analysis. For certain advertisements, areas of interest were significantly associated with harm and/or addiction perceptions. For example, higher total fixation duration on the graphic in the Smokeless for Smokers advertisement was associated with decreased perceptions of addiction (B = -.360, p = .048). Qualitative themes emerged and in many instances corroborated quantitative results. This study indicates that for some advertisements, attention on certain areas (measured through eye tracking) is associated with perceptions among young male smokers. Understanding how smokers perceive and understand products after viewing advertisements may inform regulations regarding claims about product harm and addiction and may guide public health efforts to educate smokers on the risks of emerging products. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28068113      PMCID: PMC5615820          DOI: 10.1037/adb0000230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  19 in total

1.  Smokers' perceptions of smokeless tobacco and harm reduction.

Authors:  Mojgan Sami; David S Timberlake; Russ Nelson; Brittany Goettsch; Naeem Ataian; Penney Libao; Elanora Vassile
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.222

2.  Noncombustible tobacco product advertising: how companies are selling the new face of tobacco.

Authors:  Amanda Richardson; Ollie Ganz; Carolyn Stalgaitis; David Abrams; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Effects of and attention to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages.

Authors:  Philipp Süssenbach; Sarah Niemeier; Sabine Glock
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2013-05-29

4.  Test marketing of new smokeless tobacco products in four U.S. cities.

Authors:  John D Rogers; Lois Biener; Pamela I Clark
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Judgments, awareness, and the use of snus among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Annette R Kaufman; Darren Mays; Amber R Koblitz; David B Portnoy
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Daniel Romer; Christopher Jepson; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Is snus the same as dip? Smokers' perceptions of new smokeless tobacco advertising.

Authors:  Sareh Bahreinifar; Nicolas M Sheon; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Interviews with smokers about smokeless tobacco products, risk messages and news articles.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Historical changes in cigarette smoking and smoking-related beliefs after 2 decades in a midwestern community.

Authors:  Laurie Chassin; Clark C Presson; Steven J Sherman; Kyung Kim
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  The use and perception of electronic cigarettes and snus among the U.S. population.

Authors:  Shu-Hong Zhu; Anthony Gamst; Madeleine Lee; Sharon Cummins; Lu Yin; Leslie Zoref
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advancing Tobacco Product Warning Labels Research Methods and Theory: A Summary of a Grantee Meeting Held by the US National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Noel T Brewer; Jeff Niederdeppe; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Rachel Grana; Annette R Kaufman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Eye tracking applied to tobacco smoking: current directions and future perspectives.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Maurizio Codispoti
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.349

3.  Addicted to smoking or addicted to nicotine? A focus group study on perceptions of nicotine and addiction among US adult current smokers, former smokers, non-smokers and dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Emily E Loud; Hue Trong Duong; Katherine C Henderson; Reed M Reynolds; David L Ashley; James F Thrasher; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Oral nicotine marketing claims in direct-mail advertising.

Authors:  Lauren Czaplicki; Minal Patel; Basmah Rahman; Stephanie Yoon; Barbara Schillo; Shyanika W Rose
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.