Francesco Carli1, Chelsia Gillis2, Celena Scheede-Bergdahl3. 1. a Department of Anesthesia , McGill University , Montreal , QC , Canada. 2. b Cumming School of Medicine , University of Calgary , AB , Canada. 3. c Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill Research, Centre for Physical Activity & Health , McGill University , Montreal , QC , Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditional rehabilitative approaches to perioperative cancer care have focused on the postoperative period to facilitate the return to presurgical baseline conditions. However, there is some realization that the preoperative period can be a very effective time for intervention as the patients are more amenable to target their physiological condition to prepare to overcome the metabolic cost of the surgical stress. METHODS: We undertook a narrative review of the current literature on surgical prehabilitation and discussed the current evidence of preoperative interventions before cancer surgery in order to increase physiological reserve before surgery and accelerate postoperative recovery. RESULTS: Published data indicate the positive impact of prehabilitation on postoperative functional capacity and return to daily activities. However, the current evidence on the impact on short- and long-term clinical outcome is limited, and more research needs to be conducted. CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings indicate that a group of interventions such as exercise, nutrition and anxiety reduction in the preoperative period can complement the enhanced recovery program and facilitate the return to baseline activities of daily living. It is not clear at this stage whether the preoperative increase in functional capacity mitigates the burden of postoperative morbidities and subsequent cancer therapies. Therefore, more research is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Traditional rehabilitative approaches to perioperative cancer care have focused on the postoperative period to facilitate the return to presurgical baseline conditions. However, there is some realization that the preoperative period can be a very effective time for intervention as the patients are more amenable to target their physiological condition to prepare to overcome the metabolic cost of the surgical stress. METHODS: We undertook a narrative review of the current literature on surgical prehabilitation and discussed the current evidence of preoperative interventions before cancer surgery in order to increase physiological reserve before surgery and accelerate postoperative recovery. RESULTS: Published data indicate the positive impact of prehabilitation on postoperative functional capacity and return to daily activities. However, the current evidence on the impact on short- and long-term clinical outcome is limited, and more research needs to be conducted. CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings indicate that a group of interventions such as exercise, nutrition and anxiety reduction in the preoperative period can complement the enhanced recovery program and facilitate the return to baseline activities of daily living. It is not clear at this stage whether the preoperative increase in functional capacity mitigates the burden of postoperative morbidities and subsequent cancer therapies. Therefore, more research is warranted.
Authors: Srijit Banerjee; Kate Manley; Barnabas Shaw; Liane Lewis; Gabriel Cucato; Robert Mills; Mark Rochester; Allan Clark; John M Saxton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Clarice Y Tang; Monica Turczyniak; Alesha Sayner; Kimberley Haines; Sally Butzkueven; Helen E O'Connell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael J Hughes; Rosie J Hackney; Peter J Lamb; Stephen J Wigmore; D A Christopher Deans; Richard J E Skipworth Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Ryan Howard; Yue S Yin; Lane McCandless; Stewart Wang; Michael Englesbe; David Machado-Aranda Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mariska Weenk; Harry van Goor; Maartje van Acht; Lucien Jlpg Engelen; Tom H van de Belt; Sebastian J H Bredie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fabian Grass; Martin Hübner; Jenna K Lovely; Jacopo Crippa; Kellie L Mathis; David W Larson Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Min P Kim; Edward Y Chan; Leonora M Meisenbach; Razvan Dumitru; Jessica K Brown; Faisal N Masud Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.895