Joanna Nan Wang1,2, Tor Biering-Sørensen3,4, Peter Godsk Jørgensen3,4, Jan Skov Jensen3,4,5, Rasmus Mogelvang3,6. 1. Copenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. joanna.nan.wang@gmail.com. 2. Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Post 835, Kildegaardsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. joanna.nan.wang@gmail.com. 3. Copenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. 4. Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Post 835, Kildegaardsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There exists no consensus on the site of E/e' measurement. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of septal and lateral E/e' along with the importance of their intra-individual difference. METHODS: In 1775 persons from the general population, peak early diastolic velocity (e') was obtained by color tissue Doppler at the septal and lateral mitral annular sites. The endpoint was combined of cardiovascular death or admission due to heart failure or acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10.9 years, the endpoint occurred in 227 participants. E/e'septal and E/e'lateral were equally strong predictors of cardiac events; in age- and sex-adjusted models they did not differ in AUC (septal: 0.8385, lateral: 0.8389; p = 0.94) or in continuous NRI (p = 0.84). Models using E/e'average did not improve AUC or NRI, and the intra-individual difference between sites had no predictive value (p = 0.79). E/e'septal was generally higher than E/e'lateral, thus age- and sex-specific normal values were reported for both sites for a population free of cardiac events during 10 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Septal and lateral E/e' are equally useful in predicting cardiac events in the general population. Measuring both sites provides no further predictive value than measuring a single site.
PURPOSE: There exists no consensus on the site of E/e' measurement. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of septal and lateral E/e' along with the importance of their intra-individual difference. METHODS: In 1775 persons from the general population, peak early diastolic velocity (e') was obtained by color tissue Doppler at the septal and lateral mitral annular sites. The endpoint was combined of cardiovascular death or admission due to heart failure or acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10.9 years, the endpoint occurred in 227 participants. E/e'septal and E/e'lateral were equally strong predictors of cardiac events; in age- and sex-adjusted models they did not differ in AUC (septal: 0.8385, lateral: 0.8389; p = 0.94) or in continuous NRI (p = 0.84). Models using E/e'average did not improve AUC or NRI, and the intra-individual difference between sites had no predictive value (p = 0.79). E/e'septal was generally higher than E/e'lateral, thus age- and sex-specific normal values were reported for both sites for a population free of cardiac events during 10 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Septal and lateral E/e' are equally useful in predicting cardiac events in the general population. Measuring both sites provides no further predictive value than measuring a single site.
Entities:
Keywords:
Echocardiography; General population; Normal values; Prognosis; Tissue Doppler
Authors: S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael H Picard; David Adams; S Michelle Bierig; John M Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Linda D Gillam; Andrew M Keller; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Marti McCulloch; Patricia A Pellikka; Priscilla J Peters; Raymond F Stainback; G Monet Strachan; William A Zoghbi Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Richard W Troughton; David L Prior; Christopher M Frampton; Patrick J Nash; Jeremy J Pereira; Maureen Martin; Annette Fogarty; Annitta J Morehead; Randall C Starling; James B Young; James D Thomas; Michael S Lauer; Allan L Klein Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Marti McCulloch; William A Zoghbi; Robert Davis; Chris Thomas; Hisham Dokainish Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Andrew S P Sharp; Robyn J Tapp; Simon A McG Thom; Darrel P Francis; Alun D Hughes; Alice V Stanton; Andrew Zambanini; Eoin O'Brien; Nish Chaturvedi; Simon Lyons; Sheila Byrd; Neil R Poulter; Peter S Sever; Jamil Mayet Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Martina Chantal de Knegt; Tor Biering-Sorensen; Peter Sogaard; Jacob Sivertsen; Jan Skov Jensen; Rasmus Mogelvang Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 6.875