BACKGROUND: Hip microinstability is an established diagnosis; however, its occurrence is still debated by many physicians. Diagnosis of hip microinstability is often challenging, due to a lack of specific signs or symptoms, and patients may remain undiagnosed for long periods. This may lead to early manifestation of degenerative joint disease. Consequently, careful patient and family history must be obtained and diagnostic imaging should follow. After a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient with suspected hip microinstability, the physician should focus on how to improve symptoms and functionality in daily and sports activities. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review article was to give a current update regarding this diagnosis and to provide a complete diagnostic approach in order to effectively treat hip microinstability. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the diagnosis, the non-operative and operative indications for the treatment of this complex and often misdiagnosed pathology. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is considered the best initial approach, though, surgical intervention should be considered if symptoms persist or other hip pathology exists. Successful surgical intervention, such as hip arthroscopy, should focus on restoring the normal anatomy of the hip joint in order to regain its functionality. The role of the hip joint capsule has gained particular research interest during the last years, and its repair or reconstruction during hip arthroscopy is considered necessary in order to avoid iatrogenic hip microinstability. Various capsular closure/plication techniques have been developed towards this direction with encouraging results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
BACKGROUND: Hip microinstability is an established diagnosis; however, its occurrence is still debated by many physicians. Diagnosis of hip microinstability is often challenging, due to a lack of specific signs or symptoms, and patients may remain undiagnosed for long periods. This may lead to early manifestation of degenerative joint disease. Consequently, careful patient and family history must be obtained and diagnostic imaging should follow. After a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient with suspected hip microinstability, the physician should focus on how to improve symptoms and functionality in daily and sports activities. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review article was to give a current update regarding this diagnosis and to provide a complete diagnostic approach in order to effectively treat hip microinstability. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the diagnosis, the non-operative and operative indications for the treatment of this complex and often misdiagnosed pathology. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is considered the best initial approach, though, surgical intervention should be considered if symptoms persist or other hip pathology exists. Successful surgical intervention, such as hip arthroscopy, should focus on restoring the normal anatomy of the hip joint in order to regain its functionality. The role of the hip joint capsule has gained particular research interest during the last years, and its repair or reconstruction during hip arthroscopy is considered necessary in order to avoid iatrogenic hip microinstability. Various capsular closure/plication techniques have been developed towards this direction with encouraging results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Entities:
Keywords:
hip arthroscopy; hip dysplasia; hip microinstability
Authors: Matthew J Crawford; Christopher J Dy; Jerry W Alexander; Matthew Thompson; Steven J Schroder; Charles E Vega; Rikin V Patel; Andrew R Miller; Joseph C McCarthy; Walter R Lowe; Philip C Noble Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Benjamin R Kivlan; F Richard Clemente; RobRoy L Martin; Hal D Martin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Marc J Philippon; Jeffrey J Nepple; Kevin J Campbell; Grant J Dornan; Kyle S Jansson; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Douglas N Mintz; Timothy Hooper; David Connell; Robert Buly; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Joshua D Harris; Brayden J Gerrie; David M Lintner; Kevin E Varner; Patrick C McCulloch Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Pierre A d'Hemecourt; Dai Sugimoto; Maxwell McKee-Proctor; Rebecca L Zwicker; Sarah S Jackson; Eduardo N Novais; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Andrea Stracciolini Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Vikas Khanduja; Nicholas Darby; John O'Donnell; Nicolas Bonin; Marc R Safran Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.342