| Literature DB >> 28066460 |
Yan Wang1, Yiting Wang1, Kunfeng Li2, Xijiao Song1, Jianping Chen1.
Abstract
Plant browning is a recalcitrant problem for in vitro culture and often leads to poor growth of explants and even failure of tissue culture. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying browning-induced physiological processes remain unclear. Medinilla is considered one of the most difficult genera for tissue culture owning to its severe browning. In the present study, intact aseptic plantlets of Medinilla formosana Hayata previously obtained by ovary culture, were used to explore the characteristics and molecular mechanism of the browning response. Successive morphological and anatomical observations after cutting showed that the browning of M. formosana was not lethal but adaptive. De novo transcriptome and digital gene expression (DGE) profiling using Illumina high-throughput sequencing were then used to explore molecular regulation after cutting. About 7.5 million tags of de novo transcriptome were obtained and 58,073 unigenes were assembled and annotated. A total of 6,431 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at three stages after cutting were identified, and the expression patterns of these browning-related genes were clustered and analyzed. A number of putative DEGs involved in signal transduction and secondary metabolism were particularly studied and the potential roles of these cutting-responsive mRNAs in plant defense to diverse abiotic stresses are discussed. The DGE profiling data were also validated by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. The data obtained in this study provide an excellent resource for unraveling the molecular mechanisms of browning processes during in vitro tissue culture, and lay a foundation for future studies to inhibit and eliminate browning damage.Entities:
Keywords: Medinilla; browning; cutting; gene expression profiling; high-throughput sequencing; tissue culture; transcriptome
Year: 2016 PMID: 28066460 PMCID: PMC5178855 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Overview of the Medinilla formosana transcriptome.
| Total number of raw reads | 80367590 |
| Total number of clean reads | 75,680,870 |
| GC percentage | 49.34% |
| Total Nucleotides | 244,830,224 |
| Total number of transcripts | 174,444 |
| Mean length of transcripts | 1,403 |
| Min length of transcripts | 201 |
| Max length of transcripts | 16,751 |
| Total number of unigenes | 58,073 |
| Mean length of unigenes | 810 |
Unigene annotation of M. formosana transcriptome.
| Annotation database | Number of unigenes | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Annotated in NR | 26,022 | 44.81 |
| Annotated in NT | 8,101 | 13.94 |
| Annotated in KO | 7,918 | 13.63 |
| Annotated in Swiss-Prot | 18,820 | 32.41 |
| Annotated in PFAM | 18,134 | 31.22 |
| Annotated in GO | 20,674 | 35.60 |
| Annotated in KOG | 9,394 | 16.17 |
| Annotated in all databases | 2,580 | 4.44 |
| Annotated in at least one database | 28,433 | 48.96 |
Overview of digital gene expression (DGE) analysis after cutting.
| Sample | Raw reads | Total reads | Mapped reads | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cut_0h1 | 6,825,071 | 6,642,427 | 6,130,866 | 92.30 |
| cut_0h2 | 6,371,775 | 6,099,595 | 5,625,771 | 92.23 |
| cut_4h1 | 6,416,088 | 6,177,170 | 5,686,169 | 92.05 |
| cut_4h2 | 7,429,294 | 7,126,093 | 6,559,014 | 92.04 |
| cut_4d1 | 7,326,096 | 7,040,432 | 6,502,282 | 92.36 |
| cut_4d2 | 7,164,566 | 6,970,542 | 6,421,580 | 92.12 |
Top 10 DEGs showing prominent changes after cutting.
| Gene ID | FPKM | Gene description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 4 h | 4 d | ||
| comp58041_c0 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 4.52 | Zinc finger protein, putative [ |
| comp40461_c0 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 3.44 | PREDICTED: laccase-12-like [ |
| comp54854_c0 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 10.86 | Lipid binding protein, putative [ |
| comp56210_c0 | 0.00 | 0.3 | 5.29 | PREDICTED: putative invertase inhibitor [ |
| comp41826_c1 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 12.85 | Hypothetical protein POPTRDRAFT_554508 [ |
| comp34094_c0 | 0.00 | 1.65 | 7.40 | Sugar transporter, putative [ |
| comp63629_c0 | 0.27 | 10.87 | 37.93 | 2-alkenal reductase [ |
| comp48947_c0 | 0.51 | 16.75 | 51.93 | CINNAMYL alcohol dehydrogenase-like protein [ |
| comp57388_c0 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 25.49 | Conserved hypothetical protein [ |
| comp36974_c0 | 0.20 | 3.36 | 33.02 | Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase, partial [ |
| comp58069_c1 | 4.84 | 0.49 | 0.19 | PREDICTED: metal transporter Nramp5 [ |
| comp66737_c0 | 180.98 | 35.50 | 6.93 | Beta-galactosidase, putative [ |
| comp64795_c0 | 42.18 | 10.23 | 2.52 | Hypothetical protein VITISV_039434 [ |
| comp54196_c1 | 2.74 | 0.71 | 0.21 | Hydrolase, putative [ |
| comp41083_c0 | 16.36 | 0.37 | 0.00 | PREDICTED: monothiol glutaredoxin-S2-like [ |
| comp60016_c0 | 2.49 | 0.95 | 0.31 | Sugar transporter, putative [ |
| comp66048_c0 | 55.67 | 22.17 | 7.26 | Beta-amylase [ |
| comp59756_c0 | 177.30 | 75.79 | 12.07 | Fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase [ |
| comp51640_c0 | 4.08 | 1.81 | 0.71 | Pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein At5g55740 [ |
| comp57423_c0 | 4.41 | 1.82 | 0.76 | PREDICTED: protein SRG1 [ |
| comp60636_c0 | 8.73 | 0.07 | 4.39 | Predicted protein [ |
| comp64552_c1 | 43.20 | 0.95 | 5.46 | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, putative [ |
| comp46807_c0 | 1.67 | 0.06 | 2.09 | Cytochrome P450, putative |
| comp59471_c0 | 2.35 | 0.08 | 4.34 | Predicted protein [ |
| comp47029_c0 | 12.88 | 0.42 | 2.60 | Expansin18 precursor [ |
| comp56595_c0 | 14.68 | 0.83 | 19.61 | Copper binding protein 3 [ |
| comp46179_c0 | 757.45 | 28.13 | 540.00 | Predicted protein [ |
| comp53783_c0 | 1.82 | 0.1 | 0.81 | Hypothetical protein MTR_5g047050 [ |
| comp38163_c0 | 81.15 | 4.43 | 10.49 | Chlorophyll a/b binding protein [ |
| comp53042_c0 | 19.87 | 0.92 | 8.60 | Light-harvesting complex II protein Lhcb6 [ |