Literature DB >> 28066067

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AN EPIGENETIC ASSAY TO PREDICT MISSED CANCER IN PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS.

Alan W Partin1, Wim VAN Criekinge1, Bruce J Trock1, Jonathan I Epstein1, Leander VAN Neste1.   

Abstract

Approximately 1 million prostate biopsies are performed yearly in the United States, with only ~25% resulting in prostate cancer diagnosis. However, ~40% of men receive multiple biopsies for fear of cancer being missed. DNA hypermethylation is ideally suited for early disease detection and could be used to prevent unnecessary biopsies. Men with low-risk epigenetic signatures may forego subsequent biopsy and potential complications. A meta-analysis of two validation studies was conducted to gain additional insight into the benefits for patient risk stratification. In the Methylation Analysis to Locate Occult Cancer (MATLOC) study a negative predictive value of 90% was obtained, which represents a significant improvement over standard of care. This was confirmed in the Detection of Cancer Using Methylated Events in Negative Tissue (DOCUMENT) study (88% negative predictive value), which was designed to validate the performance in an independent cohort. The epigenetic assay, in combination with other known risk factors, may help reduce unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies and identify men at highest risk of harboring occult high-grade prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28066067      PMCID: PMC5216473     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc        ISSN: 0065-7778


  33 in total

Review 1.  DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Adrian Bird
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Comprehensive report on prostate cancer misclassification by 16 currently used low-risk and active surveillance criteria.

Authors:  Jüri R Palisaar; Joachim Noldus; Björn Löppenberg; Christian von Bodman; Florian Sommerer; Thilo Eggert
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn T Dinh; Brandon A Mahal; David R Ziehr; Vinayak Muralidhar; Yu-Wei Chen; Vidya B Viswanathan; Michelle D Nezolosky; Clair J Beard; Toni K Choueiri; Neil E Martin; Peter F Orio; Christopher J Sweeney; Quoc D Trinh; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Clinical utility of an epigenetic assay to detect occult prostate cancer in histopathologically negative biopsies: results of the MATLOC study.

Authors:  Grant D Stewart; Leander Van Neste; Philippe Delvenne; Paul Delrée; Agnès Delga; S Alan McNeill; Marie O'Donnell; James Clark; Wim Van Criekinge; Joseph Bigley; David J Harrison
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Annelies Vellekoop; Stacy Loeb; Yasin Folkvaljon; Pär Stattin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis.

Authors:  W H Lee; R A Morton; J I Epstein; J D Brooks; P A Campbell; G S Bova; W S Hsieh; W B Isaacs; W G Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Prostate cancer early detection, version 1.2014. Featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines.

Authors:  Peter R Carroll; J Kellogg Parsons; Gerald Andriole; Robert R Bahnson; Daniel A Barocas; William J Catalona; Douglas M Dahl; John W Davis; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Veda N Giri; George P Hemstreet; Mark H Kawachi; Paul H Lange; Kevin R Loughlin; William Lowrance; Paul Maroni; James Mohler; Todd M Morgan; Robert B Nadler; Michael Poch; Chuck Scales; Terrence M Shanefelt; Andrew J Vickers; Robert Wake; Dorothy A Shead; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Quantitative, spatial resolution of the epigenetic field effect in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jyoti Mehrotra; Shobha Varde; Haiying Wang; Hsiling Chiu; Janet Vargo; Karen Gray; Raymond B Nagle; Jaclyn R Neri; Abhijit Mazumder
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Convergence of mutation and epigenetic alterations identifies common genes in cancer that predict for poor prognosis.

Authors:  Timothy A Chan; Sabine Glockner; Joo Mi Yi; Wei Chen; Leander Van Neste; Leslie Cope; James G Herman; Victor Velculescu; Kornel E Schuebel; Nita Ahuja; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.