Literature DB >> 28065606

Neurons Responsive to Global Visual Motion Have Unique Tuning Properties in Hummingbirds.

Andrea H Gaede1, Benjamin Goller1, Jessica P M Lam1, Douglas R Wylie2, Douglas L Altshuler3.   

Abstract

Neurons in animal visual systems that respond to global optic flow exhibit selectivity for motion direction and/or velocity. The avian lentiformis mesencephali (LM), known in mammals as the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT), is a key nucleus for global motion processing [1-4]. In all animals tested, it has been found that the majority of LM and NOT neurons are tuned to temporo-nasal (back-to-front) motion [4-11]. Moreover, the monocular gain of the optokinetic response is higher in this direction, compared to naso-temporal (front-to-back) motion [12, 13]. Hummingbirds are sensitive to small visual perturbations while hovering, and they drift to compensate for optic flow in all directions [14]. Interestingly, the LM, but not other visual nuclei, is hypertrophied in hummingbirds relative to other birds [15], which suggests enhanced perception of global visual motion. Using extracellular recording techniques, we found that there is a uniform distribution of preferred directions in the LM in Anna's hummingbirds, whereas zebra finch and pigeon LM populations, as in other tetrapods, show a strong bias toward temporo-nasal motion. Furthermore, LM and NOT neurons are generally classified as tuned to "fast" or "slow" motion [10, 16, 17], and we predicted that most neurons would be tuned to slow visual motion as an adaptation for slow hovering. However, we found the opposite result: most hummingbird LM neurons are tuned to fast pattern velocities, compared to zebra finches and pigeons. Collectively, these results suggest a role in rapid responses during hovering, as well as in velocity control and collision avoidance during forward flight of hummingbirds.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avian vision; hummingbird; optic flow; pigeon; visual motion processing; zebra finch

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28065606     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  8 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of vestibular ecomorphology in birds.

Authors:  Roger B J Benson; Ethan Starmer-Jones; Roger A Close; Stig A Walsh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Development of the horizontal optocollic reflex in juvenile barn owls (Tyto furcata pratincola).

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Ina Pappe; Sandra Brill; Hans-Ortwin Nalbach
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 3.  Induced pluripotent stem cells as a tool for comparative physiology: lessons from the thirteen-lined ground squirrel.

Authors:  Jingxing Ou; Sarah Rosa; Luke E Berchowitz; Wei Li
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The retinal projection to the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) and Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna).

Authors:  Cristian Gutierrez-Ibanez; Andrea H Gaede; Max R Dannish; Douglas L Altshuler; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Visual-Cerebellar Pathways and Their Roles in the Control of Avian Flight.

Authors:  Douglas R Wylie; Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Andrea H Gaede; Douglas L Altshuler; Andrew N Iwaniuk
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Visual Sensory Signals Dominate Tactile Cues during Docked Feeding in Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Paolo S Segre; Kevin M Middleton; Michael H Dickinson; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Optocollic responses in adult barn owls (Tyto furcata).

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Ina Pappe; Hans-Ortwin Nalbach
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Comparison of Visually Guided Flight in Insects and Birds.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.