Literature DB >> 28065198

Random spatial patterning of cone bipolar cell mosaics in the mouse retina.

Patrick W Keeley1, Jason J Kim1, Sammy C S Lee2, Silke Haverkamp3, Benjamin E Reese1.   

Abstract

Retinal bipolar cells spread their dendritic arbors to tile the retinal surface, extending them to the tips of the dendritic fields of their homotypic neighbors, minimizing dendritic overlap. Such uniform nonredundant dendritic coverage of these populations would suggest a degree of spatial order in the properties of their somal distributions, yet few studies have examined the patterning in retinal bipolar cell mosaics. The present study examined the organization of two types of cone bipolar cells in the mouse retina, the Type 2 cells and the Type 4 cells, and compared their spatial statistical properties with those of the horizontal cells and the cholinergic amacrine cells, as well as to random simulations of cells matched in density and constrained by soma size. The Delauney tessellation of each field was computed, from which nearest neighbor distances and Voronoi domain areas were extracted, permitting a calculation of their respective regularity indexes (RIs). The spatial autocorrelation of the field was also computed, from which the effective radius and packing factor (PF) were determined. Both cone bipolar cell types were found to be less regular and less efficiently packed than either the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells. Furthermore, while the latter two cell types had RIs and PFs in excess of those for their matched random simulations, the two types of cone bipolar cells had spatial statistical properties comparable to random distributions. An analysis of single labeled cone bipolar cells revealed dendritic arbors frequently skewed to one side of the soma, as would be expected from a randomly distributed population of cells with dendrites that tile. Taken together, these results suggest that, unlike the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells which minimize proximity to one another, cone bipolar cell types are constrained only by their physical size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dendritic coverage; Effective radius; Exclusion zone; Nearest neighbor; Packing factor; Regularity index; Voronoi domain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28065198      PMCID: PMC5624321          DOI: 10.1017/S0952523816000183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  41 in total

1.  The density recovery profile: a method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies.

Authors:  R W Rodieck
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Regularity and packing of the horizontal cell mosaic in different strains of mice.

Authors:  Mary A Raven; Stephanie B Stagg; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Clonal expansion and cell dispersion in the developing mouse retina.

Authors:  B E Reese; B D Necessary; P P Tam; B Faulkner-Jones; S S Tan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Neuronal cell types and connectivity: lessons from the retina.

Authors:  H Sebastian Seung; Uygar Sümbül
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Developmental plasticity of dendritic morphology and the establishment of coverage and connectivity in the outer retina.

Authors:  Benjamin E Reese; Patrick W Keeley; Sammy C S Lee; Irene E Whitney
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.964

6.  Chromatic bipolar cell pathways in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Tobias Breuninger; Christian Puller; Silke Haverkamp; Thomas Euler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sox2 regulates cholinergic amacrine cell positioning and dendritic stratification in the retina.

Authors:  Irene E Whitney; Patrick W Keeley; Ace J St John; Amanda G Kautzman; Jeremy N Kay; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Type 4 OFF cone bipolar cells of the mouse retina express calsenilin and contact cones as well as rods.

Authors:  Silke Haverkamp; Dana Specht; Sriparna Majumdar; Nikhat F Zaidi; Johann Helmut Brandstätter; Wilma Wasco; Heinz Wässle; Susanne Tom Dieck
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Diverse strategies engaged in establishing stereotypic wiring patterns among neurons sharing a common input at the visual system's first synapse.

Authors:  Felice A Dunn; Rachel O L Wong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  MEGF10 and MEGF11 mediate homotypic interactions required for mosaic spacing of retinal neurons.

Authors:  Jeremy N Kay; Monica W Chu; Joshua R Sanes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  From random to regular: Variation in the patterning of retinal mosaics.

Authors:  Patrick W Keeley; Stephen J Eglen; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  The somal patterning of the AII amacrine cell mosaic in the mouse retina is indistinguishable from random simulations matched for density and constrained by soma size.

Authors:  Patrick W Keeley; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Interrelationships between Cellular Density, Mosaic Patterning, and Dendritic Coverage of VGluT3 Amacrine Cells.

Authors:  Patrick W Keeley; Mikayla C Lebo; Jordan D Vieler; Jason J Kim; Ace J St John; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Contraction of axonal and dendritic fields in Sox5-deficient cone bipolar cells is accompanied by axonal sprouting and dendritic hyper-innervation of pedicles.

Authors:  Bridget Kulesh; Benjamin E Reese; Patrick W Keeley
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.543

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.