Gunnar Keppel1,2,3, Gianluigi Ottaviani4,5, Susan Harrison6, Grant W Wardell-Johnson7, Matteo Marcantonio8, Ladislav Mucina4,9. 1. Natural and Built Environments Research Centre, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, GPO, SA, Adelaide, Australia. 2. Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, SA, Adelaide, Australia. 3. Biodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany. 4. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Perth, Australia. 5. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Třeboň, Czech Republic. 6. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 7. Curtin Institute for Biodiversity and Climate, ARC Centre for Mine Site Restoration and School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia. 8. Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 9. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Abstract
Background: Refugia are island-like habitats that are linked to long-term environmental stability and, as a result, high endemism. Conservation of refugia and endemism hotspots should be based on a deep ecological and evolutionary understanding of their functioning, which remains limited. Although functional traits can provide such insights, a corresponding, coherent framework is lacking. Proposed Framework: Plant communities in refugia and endemism hotspots should, due to long-term environmental stability, display unique functional characteristics linked to distinct phylogenetic patterns. Therefore, such communities should be characterized by a functional signature that exhibits: (1) distinct values and combinations of traits, (2) higher functional diversity and (3) a prevalence of similar traits belonging to more distantly related lineages inside, compared to outside, of endemism hotspots and refugia. While the limited functional trait data available from refugia and endemism hotspots do not allow these predictions to be tested rigorously, three potential applications of the functional signature in biogeography and conservation planning are highlighted. Firstly, it allows the functional characteristics of endemism hotspots and refugia to be identified. Secondly, the strength of the functional signature can be compared among these entities, and with the surrounding landscape, to provide an estimate of the capacity of endemism hotspots and refugia to buffer environmental changes. Finally, the pattern of the functional signature can reveal ecological and evolutionary processes driving community assembly and functioning, which can assist in predicting the effect of environmental changes (e.g. climate, land-use) on communities in endemism hotspots and refugia. Conclusion: The proposed functional signature concept allows the systematic integration of plant functional traits and phylogeny into the study of endemism hotspots and refugia, but more data on functional traits in these entities are urgently needed. Overcoming this limitation would facilitate rigorous testing of the proposed predictions for the functional signature, advancing the eco-evolutionary understanding of endemism hotspots and refugia.
Background: Refugia are island-like habitats that are linked to long-term environmental stability and, as a result, high endemism. Conservation of refugia and endemism hotspots should be based on a deep ecological and evolutionary understanding of their functioning, which remains limited. Although functional traits can provide such insights, a corresponding, coherent framework is lacking. Proposed Framework: Plant communities in refugia and endemism hotspots should, due to long-term environmental stability, display unique functional characteristics linked to distinct phylogenetic patterns. Therefore, such communities should be characterized by a functional signature that exhibits: (1) distinct values and combinations of traits, (2) higher functional diversity and (3) a prevalence of similar traits belonging to more distantly related lineages inside, compared to outside, of endemism hotspots and refugia. While the limited functional trait data available from refugia and endemism hotspots do not allow these predictions to be tested rigorously, three potential applications of the functional signature in biogeography and conservation planning are highlighted. Firstly, it allows the functional characteristics of endemism hotspots and refugia to be identified. Secondly, the strength of the functional signature can be compared among these entities, and with the surrounding landscape, to provide an estimate of the capacity of endemism hotspots and refugia to buffer environmental changes. Finally, the pattern of the functional signature can reveal ecological and evolutionary processes driving community assembly and functioning, which can assist in predicting the effect of environmental changes (e.g. climate, land-use) on communities in endemism hotspots and refugia. Conclusion: The proposed functional signature concept allows the systematic integration of plant functional traits and phylogeny into the study of endemism hotspots and refugia, but more data on functional traits in these entities are urgently needed. Overcoming this limitation would facilitate rigorous testing of the proposed predictions for the functional signature, advancing the eco-evolutionary understanding of endemism hotspots and refugia.
Authors: Etienne Laliberté; Jessie A Wells; Fabrice Declerck; Daniel J Metcalfe; Carla P Catterall; Cibele Queiroz; Isabelle Aubin; Stephen P Bonser; Yi Ding; Jennifer M Fraterrigo; Sean McNamara; John W Morgan; Dalia Sánchez Merlos; Peter A Vesk; Margaret M Mayfield Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Francesco de Bello; Jodi N Price; Tamara Münkemüller; Jaan Liira; Martin Zobel; Wilfried Thuiller; Pille Gerhold; Lars Götzenberger; Sébastien Lavergne; Jan Leps; Kristjan Zobel; Meelis Pärtel Journal: Ecology Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: Janet Franklin; Frank W Davis; Makihiko Ikegami; Alexandra D Syphard; Lorraine E Flint; Alan L Flint; Lee Hannah Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Brent D Mishler; Nunzio Knerr; Carlos E González-Orozco; Andrew H Thornhill; Shawn W Laffan; Joseph T Miller Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Thomas Ibanez; E Blanchard; V Hequet; G Keppel; M Laidlaw; R Pouteau; H Vandrot; P Birnbaum Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Jiri Dolezal; Jan Altman; Martin Kopecky; Tomas Cerny; Stepan Janecek; Michael Bartos; Petr Petrik; Miroslav Srutek; Jan Leps; Jong-Suk Song Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gisela C Stotz; Cristian Salgado-Luarte; Alonso T Vigil; Henry J De La Cruz; Víctor Pastén-Marambio; Ernesto Gianoli Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 4.357