Literature DB >> 28064177

Nitric oxide acts upstream of ethylene in cell wall phosphorus reutilization in phosphorus-deficient rice.

Xiao Fang Zhu1, Chun Quan Zhu1, Chao Wang1, Xiao Ying Dong1, Ren Fang Shen1.   

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) and ethylene are both involved in cell wall phosphorus (P) reutilization in P-deficient rice; however, the crosstalk between them remains unclear. In the present study using P-deficient 'Nipponbare' (Nip), root NO accumulation significantly increased after 1 h and reached a maximum at 3 h, while ethylene production significantly increased after 3 h and reached a maximum at 6 h, indicating NO responded more quickly than ethylene. Irrespective of P status, addition of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) significantly increased while the NO scavenger 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (c-PTIO) significantly decreased the production of ethylene, while neither the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) nor the ethylene inhibitor aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) had any influence on NO accumulation, suggesting NO acted upstream of ethylene. Under P-deficient conditions, SNP and ACC alone significantly increased root soluble P content through increasing pectin content, and c-PTIO addition to the ACC treatment still showed the same tendency; however, AVG+SNP treatment had no effect, further indicating that ethylene was the downstream signal affecting pectin content. The expression of the phosphate transporter gene OsPT2 showed the same tendency as the NO-ethylene-pectin pathway. Taken together, we conclude that ethylene functions downstream of NO in cell wall P reutilization in P-deficient rice.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell wall; NO; Oryza sativa; ethylene; pectin; phosphorus; remobilization; translocation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28064177      PMCID: PMC6055659          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


Introduction

As one of the major plant macronutrients, phosphorus (P) is not only essential for the structure of cell components such as DNA, RNA, ATP and membranes, but also involved in plant development and metabolism (Marschner, 1995). Despite high P in the soil, inorganic phosphorous (Pi) is one of the least available nutrients for crops as much of it is converted to organic matter by microorganisms or is bound to cations, and thus difficult for plants to absorb (Tiessen, 2008; Wu ). In fact, the concentration of Pi available in soil rarely exceeds 10 μM (Shen ), which is barely sufficient to meet plants’ needs. Therefore, it is desirable to investigate the mechanisms by which plants can survive under conditions of P starvation, to develop new crops that can adapt to low P conditions. One of the most common strategies used by plants to cope with low Pi availability is to enhance Pi acquisition from soil by remodeling the architecture and morphology of the root system. This can be done, for example, by growing more lateral roots in shallow soils, inhibiting elongation of the primary root, increasing the number of root hairs and root branches (López-Bucio ; Desnos, 2008), forming symbiotic associations with mycorrhizal fungi (Brundrett, 2002; Boulet and Lambers, 2005), or forming ‘root clusters’ (Shane and Lambers, 2005; Lynch and Brown, 2008; Vance, 2008). Plants may also secrete root exudates, such as carboxylates (Keerthisinghe ), phenolics (Juszczuk ), mucilage (Grimal ), and phosphatases (Wasaki ; Abram ) to change the chemical and biological properties of the soil, thus facilitating the release of insoluble P from the soil and allowing it to be utilized by the plant. Another strategy is to relocate and reutilize internal Pi, for instance, by altering metabolic pathways, remodeling lipids, or enhancing ribonuclease (RNase) activity (Liang ). Zhu described a pectin-regulated strategy in rice in which the pectin content is increased to compete with iron (Fe) from FePO4 and root cell wall P is reutilized under P-limited conditions. As a stress phytohormone, ethylene is involved in plant responses to various biotic or abiotic stresses, such as heat stress (Clarke ), ozone stress (Vahala ) and nutrient toxicity or deficiency (Iqbal ). Li reported a significant increment of ethylene emission under P-deficient conditions, which in turn modified the root hydraulic conductivity. Furthermore, addition of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) to the roots of P-sufficient plants leads to the same root architecture observed in plants under P-deficient conditions, e.g. increased root hair formation (Tanimoto ). Ethylene is also involved in cell wall P remobilization in rice to maintain internal Pi homeostasis (Zhu ); however, it is unknown whether other signaling molecules regulate ethylene in this root cell wall P reutilization pathway. NO is a signaling molecule that is involved in diverse physiological processes throughout the plant life cycle. NO functions in responses to abiotic stresses (Qiao ), including salt stress in rice (Uchida ), ultraviolet radiation in maize (Wang ) and heavy metal stress in wheat (Singh ). In white lupin (Lupinus albus), under P-deficient conditions, root NO accumulation is significantly increased, which in turn stimulates the exudation of citrate to enhance external P acquisition, thus leading to improved growth (Wang ; Meng ). In our previous study, we found that NO is involved in rice root cell wall P remobilization (Zhu ), and now, in the present study, we used rice cultivar ‘Nipponbare’ (Nip) to study whether there is crosstalk between NO and ethylene in internal cell wall P remobilization under P-deficient conditions. This study provides the first description of an upstream regulatory mechanism of ethylene for cell wall P reutilization under P-deficient conditions in rice.

Materials and methods

Plant material and cultivation conditions

Seeds of rice (Oryza sativa) spp. japonica ‘Nipponbare’ (‘Nip’) were first dipped in 1% NaClO, then incubated in water after thoroughly washing with deionized water. Two days later, seeds were cultivated on a plastic supporting net (about 2 mm2) in a plastic container containing a 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 5.5) solution. After another 2 d, this solution was then replaced with full strength Kimura B solution in accordance with Zhu ). Seedlings were grown under controlled conditions: photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 400 µmol m–2 s–1 light intensity, 60% relative humidity, day/night cycles of 14 h days at 26 °C and 10 h nights at 23 °C. The vertical height of the uppermost leaves was about 20 cm when the PAR measurement was undertaken. To measure NO content and the production of ethylene, 2-week-old seedlings were grown under P-deficient (–P) conditions. Rice roots were collected at 0 (+P control), 1, 3, 6, and 12 h and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 d. To investigate which hormone acts upstream of cell wall P reutilization, 2-week-old seedlings were transferred to the following treatments: +P, +P + sodium nitroprusside (SNP), +P + 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (c-PTIO), –P, –P + SNP, and –P + c-PTIO. Since the production of ethylene reached its maximum value at 6 h after –P treatment, rice roots were collected after 6 h of treatment, and ethylene production was measured. A further six groups of rice plants were transferred to 1.5-liter pots with the following treatments: +P, +P + 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), +P + aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), –P, –P + ACC, and –P + AVG. Rice roots were collected and NO content was measured 3 h after treatment because NO content reached its maximum value after 3 h of –P treatment. To investigate soluble P content and to extract cell walls, 2-week-old seedlings were transferred to the following 10 treatments: +P, +P + ACC, +P + SNP, +P + ACC + c-PTIO, +P + SNP + AVG, –P, –P + ACC, –P + SNP, –P + ACC + c-PTIO, and –P + SNP + AVG. The final concentrations were 1 μM ACC, 2.5 μM SNP, 10 μM c-PTIO, and 0.2 μM AVG. As SNP was applied as pretreatment, the nutrient solution was renewed after 24 h with P-deficient or P-sufficient solutions containing other substances for another 6 d. The pH was adjusted to 5.6 and the corresponding treated nutrient solution was renewed every 3 d.

Measurement of soluble Pi content

After washing three times with deionized water, roots and shoots were separated and weighed immediately, then ground with 5 M sulfuric acid. After a 10-fold dilution with deionized water, material was centrifuged at 12 000 g for 10 min, and 400 μl supernatant was mixed with 200 μl ammonium molybdate containing 15% fresh ascorbic acid (pH 5.0) for 30 min. Absorption values were determined at 650 nm, and the final Pi concentration was calculated per gram fresh weight (Zheng ).

Extraction and fractionation of cell walls

A previously described method of Zhong and Lauchli (1993) was used for cell wall extraction. First, about 0.05 g fresh weight of roots was ground in liquid nitrogen, and then washed with 8 ml 75% ethanol, 8 ml acetone, 8 ml 1:1 methanol:chloroform and 8 ml methanol, respectively, and incubated for 20 min. The final solution was centrifuged at 3256 g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the pellets were dried and stored at 4 °C for further use. Extraction of pectin was carried out as follows: about 2 mg cell walls was weighed into a 1.5 ml tube, and 1 ml deionized water was added. Then this suspended solution was incubated in a 100 °C water bath for 1 h. After centrifuged at 12 000 g for 10 min, supernatants were collected in a 5-ml tube. This procedure was repeated three times (Zhong and Lauchli, 1993).

Measurement of pectin content and pectin methylesterase activity

Pectin content was estimated by the concentration of uronic acid. Briefly, 200 μl pectin solution was incubated with 1 ml 98% H2SO4 containing 12.5 mM Na2B4O7·10H2O at 100 ºC in a water bath for 5 min. After cooling, 20 μl of 0.15% m-hydroxydiphenyl was added and absorbance was measured at 520 nm with galacturonic acid as the standard. For measurement of pectin methylesterase (PME) activity, about 5 mg cell walls was first suspended in 1 M NaCl solution (pH 6.0) at 4 °C for 1 h with repeated vortexing (20 s for 10 min each). Then the extracts were centrifuged at 16 800 g for 10 min to collect the supernatant. Finally, after 50 μl of supernatant was incubated with 10 μl alcohol oxidase and 100 μl 200 mM phosphate buffer (0.2 M Na2HPO4:0.2 M NaH2PO4 , 21:4, v/v) containing 0.64 mg ml–1 pectin at 30 °C for 10 min, 200 μl 0.5 M NaOH containing 5 mg ml–1 Purpald was added and absorbance was measured at 550 nm with methanol as the standard.

Measurement of cell wall P content

Cell wall P concentration was determined using the following steps: approximately 2 mg cell walls was shaken with 1 ml 2 M HCl in a 1.5 ml tube. After 24 h, a sample was centrifuged, and the supernatant was collected for P concentration determination (Zhu ).

Measurement of root NO content

Accumulation of endogenous NO in rice roots was assayed using 10 μM 4-amino-5-methylamino-2,7-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM DA). The apical 1 cm of root tips was collected and washing with HEPESKOH (pH 7.4). After 15 min, root tips were incubated with 500 μl DAF-FM DA in darkness for 30 min. Then, fresh buffer was used to wash root tips three times to remove excess fluorescent dye. A Nikon Eclipse 80i light microscope was used to visualize the NO fluorescence. The intensity of fluorescence was measured using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software (Besson-Bard ).

Measurement of ethylene emission

Emission of ethylene from rice roots was analysed according to Wu . Briefly, rice roots were detached and transferred to 15 ml glass vials that contained 1 ml distilled water, and the vials were immediately sealed with a rubber stopper. After 2 h incubation in darkness at 30 °C, 1 ml gas from each vial was measured according to Zhu ).

Analysis of relative gene expression

After treatment for 1 week, roots were collected and immediately transferred to liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed according to Zhu ). Agarose gel electrophoresis and spectroscopy were used to guarantee the integrity and quality of RNA. The total volume of the real-time PCR mixture was 10 µl, made up of 5 µl SYBR Premix ExTaq, 0.6 µl forward primers, 0.6 µl reverse primers, 2.8 µl sterile distilled water and 1 µl cDNA (10-fold dilution). Each cDNA sample was run in triplicate. Primers used in the present study are given in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online (Ai ; Jia ). OsHistone H3 (Huang ) was used to confirm that the expression of the reference gene OsACTIN was independent of all treatments (see Supplementary Fig. S1).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted at least in triplicate. One-way ANOVA was used to analyse the data, and the mean values were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test. Letters on the figures presented here indicate that the mean values were statistically different at P<0.05.

Results

To verify the effects of NO and ethylene on rice, 2-week-old Nip seedlings were transferred to +P or –P nutrient solutions. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S2, more soluble P was found in roots and shoots when seedlings were pretreated with SNP or when ACC was applied to the –P nutrient solution, implying that both NO and ethylene are involved in internal P reutilization in Nip. In our previous study, we found that approximately 50% of the total P in Nip roots was deposited in cell walls and pectin played pivotal roles in root cell wall P reutilization (Zhu ). As expected, in the present study, less P was retained in the root cell walls, and cell wall pectin content increased when plants were pretreated with SNP or when ACC was applied to the nutrient solution under –P conditions (see Supplementary Fig. S3). This finding corroborates our previous studies (Zhu ), indicating that both NO and ethylene are involved in the reutilization of cell wall-deposited P through regulating pectin content. As both NO and ethylene act upstream of cell wall pectin, the question was raised whether ethylene acts through NO, NO acts through ethylene, or both act in conjunction. To resolve this, 2-week-old normally cultivated (+P) Nip seedlings were transferred to a completely P-deficient solution, and the production of NO and ethylene was measured at 0 (+P as control), 1, 3, 6, and 12 h. As shown in Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. S4, NO content significantly increased after 1 h –P treatment and reached its maximum value at 3 h. However, the production of ethylene increased after 3 h –P treatment and reached its maximum value at 6 h (Fig. 1B). This conclusion was further confirmed by the measurement of NO and ethylene content for the remainder of the experimental period. Compared with the 12 h –P treatment, both NO and ethylene content were similar or even lower than the 7 d –P treatment (see Supplementary Fig. S5). These findings suggest that NO responded more quickly than ethylene when plants were starved of P. This finding in turn raised the question of whether the increased accumulation of NO acts as the signal to increase the production of ethylene. As shown in Fig. 2B, irrespective of P status, the NO donor SNP significantly increased while the NO scavenger c-PTIO significantly decreased the production of ethylene, suggesting that NO may act upstream of ethylene. This hypothesis was further confirmed by the finding that the ethylene precursor ACC and inhibitor AVG had no effect on NO accumulation in rice roots, neither under P-sufficient nor under P-deficient conditions (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S6). Moreover, in the presence of ACC, root and shoot soluble P content was unaffected by c-PTIO when compared with the –P + ACC treatment (Fig. 3). However, when compared with the –P + SNP treatment, the root soluble P content was decreased when AVG was applied in combination with SNP (Fig. 3A), indicating that decreased ethylene production by exogenous application of AVG counteracts and overrides the synergistic effect resulting from the increment of NO content. These results suggest that ethylene acts downstream of NO in this internal P reutilization pathway.
Fig. 1.

Effect of P deficiency on NO production (A) and ethylene emission (B) in rice root. NO production is indicated by green fluorescence and expressed as relative fluorescence intensity (% of minimal production). Data are means+SD (n=10). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05. FW: fresh weight.

Fig. 2.

Effect of different treatments on NO production (A) and ethylene emission (B) in rice root. NO production is indicated by green fluorescence and expressed as relative fluorescence intensity (% of minimal production). Data are means+SD (n=10). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05.

Fig. 3.

Effect of different treatments on root (A) and shoot (B) soluble P content in P-deficient rice. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05.

Effect of P deficiency on NO production (A) and ethylene emission (B) in rice root. NO production is indicated by green fluorescence and expressed as relative fluorescence intensity (% of minimal production). Data are means+SD (n=10). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05. FW: fresh weight. Effect of different treatments on NO production (A) and ethylene emission (B) in rice root. NO production is indicated by green fluorescence and expressed as relative fluorescence intensity (% of minimal production). Data are means+SD (n=10). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05. Effect of different treatments on root (A) and shoot (B) soluble P content in P-deficient rice. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05. As cell wall pectin contributes greatly to the internal P reutilization in P-deficient rice (Zhu ), we aimed to further clarify the relationship between NO, ethylene and cell wall pectin by combining AVG and SNP treatments. We found that the inhibition of ethylene production (caused by application of AVG) abolished the effect of SNP treatment alone and thus decreased the pectin content to a level as low as –P treatment alone. However, c-PTIO application did not reverse the increment of pectin content in the presence of ACC (Fig. 4A). This result suggests that ethylene acts downstream of NO to regulate the root cell wall pectin content in P-deficient rice. Only de-esterified pectin will present a net negative charge in the cell wall space, and this negative charge is generated from the demethylation of the pectin, which is catalysed by methylesterase (PME). Accordingly, we measured PME activity and found that it showed the same tendency as the pectin content (Fig. 4B), indicating that the pectin that accumulates in response to NO signaling mediated by ethylene is enriched in de-esterified pectin.
Fig. 4.

Effect of different treatments on cell wall pectin content (A) and pectin methylesterase (PME) activity (B) in P-deficient rice. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05.

Effect of different treatments on cell wall pectin content (A) and pectin methylesterase (PME) activity (B) in P-deficient rice. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05. To determine if NO and ethylene might affect the translocation of P in rice under P-starvation conditions, three candidate genes (OsPT2, OsPT6, and OsPT8) responsible for P translocation were analysed and OsACTIN was used as the reference gene. When Nip was cultivated in P-sufficient conditions, the addition of SNP or ACC alone significantly increased the expression of OsPT2 in root cells, but had almost no influence on the expression of OsPT6 or OsPT8 (Fig. 5). This was also true when Nip was cultivated in –P conditions. These findings indicate that OsPT2 may be associated with the role of NO or ethylene in alleviating P deficiency (Fig. 5). Moreover, as shown in Fig. 6, compared with the SNP + AVG treatment, c-PTIO combined with ACC treatment resulted in higher expression of OsPT2. This pattern held true when OsHistone H3 was used as the reference gene (see Supplementary Figs S7 and S8), further indicating that ethylene, rather than NO, is the more downstream signal that induced the expression of OsPT2 in P-deficient rice.
Fig. 5.

Effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on the expression of OsPT2 (A), OsPT6 (B), and OsPT8 (C), and effect of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) on the expression of OsPT2 (D), OsPT6 (E), and OsPT8 (F) in rice roots under P-sufficient (+P) or P-deficient (–P) conditions. OsACTIN was used as the reference gene. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05.

Fig. 6.

Effect of different treatments on the expression of OsPT2 (A), OsPT6 (B), and OsPT8 (C) in P-deficient rice. OsACTIN was used as the reference gene. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05.

Effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on the expression of OsPT2 (A), OsPT6 (B), and OsPT8 (C), and effect of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) on the expression of OsPT2 (D), OsPT6 (E), and OsPT8 (F) in rice roots under P-sufficient (+P) or P-deficient (–P) conditions. OsACTIN was used as the reference gene. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05. Effect of different treatments on the expression of OsPT2 (A), OsPT6 (B), and OsPT8 (C) in P-deficient rice. OsACTIN was used as the reference gene. Data are means+SD (n=4). Columns with different letters show significant differences at P<0.05.

Discussion

As a signaling molecule and a stress phytohormone, NO and ethylene are involved in a variety of stress responses (Morgan and Drew, 1997; Delledonne ), such as Fe deficiency (Wu ; Zhu ). In our previous study, we found that both ethylene and NO were involved in the P-deficiency response in rice (Zhu ). In the present study, after pretreatment with SNP, or when ACC was applied, rice root and shoot soluble P contents were significantly increased, irrespective of P status (see Supplementary Fig. S2). This finding indicates that NO and ethylene do indeed take part in the internal reutilization of P in rice, especially under –P conditions. Since the effect of NO on internal P reutilization parallels that of ethylene, it is possible that there is crosstalk between them. Accumulating evidence indicates that ethylene acts downstream of NO and that ethylene production can be stimulated by NO in response to abiotic stresses such as ozone stress in tobacco (Ederli ) and ultraviolet B stress in maize seedlings (Wang ). In the present study, when Nip was grown in the –P nutrient solution, NO accumulated more quickly than ethylene in the root (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S4), and the emission of ethylene was significantly increased under SNP pretreatment and notably decreased under c-PTIO treatment (Fig. 2B). However, ACC and AVG failed to induce the accumulation of NO (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S6), indicating that NO acts as an upstream signal to induce the emission of ethylene in rice under –P stress. This conclusion was strengthened by the fact that treatment with SNP and AVG failed to increase root soluble P, but treatment with ACC and c-PTIO increased root and shoot soluble P (Fig. 3), indicating that ethylene acts downstream of NO. Where does the internal P come from in the P-deficient rice? As demonstrated in our previous study, about 50% of the rice root total P is stored in the cell wall (Zhu ). Thus we hypothesized that the incremental increase in soluble P by SNP or ACC treatment may result from the remobilization of the cell wall P. This hypothesis was confirmed (see Supplementary Fig. S3B, D. Although cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin are the main components of plant cell walls, only pectin has been shown to be involved in plant response to P starvation. For example, compared with other plants, groundnut possesses a superior ability to acquire soil P in P-deficient soil because its root cell wall has ‘contact reaction’ pectin (Ae and Shen, 2002). Recently, Zhu reported that pectin is able to reutilize cell wall P by using its negative charges (–COO–) to bind cations such as Al or Fe, thus facilitating the release of cell wall P. It is interesting that the content of pectin in the rice root cell wall can be regulated by signaling molecules such as NO under Cd toxicity (Xiong ) and by ethylene under P-deficient conditions (Zhu ). In the present study, under –P conditions, when SNP or ACC was applied exogenously, an incremental change in cell wall pectin content was observed in association with a notable reduction in cell wall P content (see Supplementary Fig. S3). This indicates that both NO and ethylene take part in the reutilization of cell wall P to maintain internal P homeostasis, and provides an opportunity to further investigate which hormone acts upstream of the other. A combination of SNP and AVG treatment decreased the de-esterified cell wall pectin content to a level as low as under –P treatment alone, while combined c-PTIO and ACC treatment still increased de-esterified pectin content (Fig. 4). This finding further indicates that the regulation of pectin content is largely dependent on ethylene, while NO acts upstream of ethylene in the P-deficient rice. Regulation of the translocation of internal soluble P is also very important for resistance of rice to P deficiency. Three rice Pi:H+ cotransporters (PHTs) have been shown to be essential for the translocation of P from the root to the shoot (Ai ; Jia ). In the present study, under –P conditions, SNP and ACC markedly enhanced the expression of OsPT2 (Fig. 5), implying that NO and ethylene signaling may share the same pathway. Furthermore, higher expression of OsPT2 was observed in the –P + c-PTIO + ACC treatment when compared with –P + SNP + AVG (Fig. 6), indicating that ethylene is the more downstream signal in the regulation of the expression of OsPT2 relative to NO. The regulatory behavior of ethylene is mainly attributed to 12 ethylene-responsive element-binding factors (with a GCCGCC motif) located in the OsPT2 promoter (Chakravarthy ). Furthermore, compared with –P treatment alone, the increased shoot soluble P content observed under –P + SNP + AVG treatment may be attributed to the significantly increased expression of OsPT2 and OsPT8 (Figs 3B and 6). Based on current results and our previous work, we propose a model shown in Fig. 7. When rice suffers P deficiency, NO responds quickly and induces the production of ethylene. Then, on the one hand, pectin content is increased to reutilize cell wall P, and on the other hand, the expression of OsPT2 is up-regulated to facilitate the translocation of P from root to shoot. Thus, the growth of rice under P-deficient conditions is improved.
Fig. 7.

Model illustrating the hypothetical function of ethylene in NO-mediated root cell wall P reutilization in rice (Oryza sativa) under –P conditions. Red cross indicates inhibition of the pathway.

Model illustrating the hypothetical function of ethylene in NO-mediated root cell wall P reutilization in rice (Oryza sativa) under –P conditions. Red cross indicates inhibition of the pathway.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online. Fig. S1. Effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), and different treatments on the expression of the reference gene OsACTIN in rice roots under +P or –P condition. Fig. S2. Effect of SNP on root soluble P content, shoot soluble P content, and effect of ACC on root soluble P content and shoot soluble P content under +P or –P condition. Fig. S3. Effect of SNP on cell wall pectin content, cell wall P content and effect of ACC on cell wall pectin content, cell wall P content in rice root under +P or –P condition. Fig. S4. Effect of P deficiency on NO production in rice root. Fig. S5. Effect of P deficiency on NO production and ethylene emission in rice root. Fig. S6. Effect of different treatments on NO production in rice root under P-sufficient and P-deficient condition. Fig. S7. Effect of SNP on the expression of OsPT2, OsPT6, and OsPT8, and effect ACC on the expression of OsPT2, OsPT6, and OsPT8 in rice roots under +P or –P condition. Fig. S8. Effect of different treatments on the expression of OsPT2, OsPT6, and OsPT8 in P-deficient rice. Table S1. Gene-specific primers used in this work. Click here for additional data file.
  27 in total

1.  A tonoplast-localized half-size ABC transporter is required for internal detoxification of aluminum in rice.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Huang; Naoki Yamaji; Zhichang Chen; Jian Feng Ma
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Nitric oxide is involved in phosphorus deficiency-induced cluster-root development and citrate exudation in white lupin.

Authors:  B L Wang; X Y Tang; L Y Cheng; A Z Zhang; W H Zhang; F S Zhang; J Q Liu; Y Cao; D L Allan; C P Vance; J B Shen
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  The phosphate transporter gene OsPht1;8 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in rice.

Authors:  Hongfang Jia; Hongyan Ren; Mian Gu; Jianning Zhao; Shubin Sun; Xiao Zhang; Jieyu Chen; Ping Wu; Guohua Xu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Nitric oxide is the shared signalling molecule in phosphorus- and iron-deficiency-induced formation of cluster roots in white lupin (Lupinus albus).

Authors:  Zhi Bin Meng; Li Qian Chen; Dong Suo; Gui Xin Li; Cai Xian Tang; Shao Jian Zheng
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Jasmonates act with salicylic acid to confer basal thermotolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Shannon M Clarke; Simona M Cristescu; Otto Miersch; Frans J M Harren; Claus Wasternack; Luis A J Mur
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Physiological and transcriptome analysis of iron and phosphorus interaction in rice seedlings.

Authors:  Luqing Zheng; Fangliang Huang; Reena Narsai; Jiaojiao Wu; Estelle Giraud; Fei He; Longjun Cheng; Fang Wang; Ping Wu; James Whelan; Huixia Shou
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Ethylene is involved in root phosphorus remobilization in rice (Oryza sativa) by regulating cell-wall pectin and enhancing phosphate translocation to shoots.

Authors:  Xiao Fang Zhu; Chun Quan Zhu; Xu Sheng Zhao; Shao Jian Zheng; Ren Fang Shen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Exogenous nitric oxide enhances cadmium tolerance of rice by increasing pectin and hemicellulose contents in root cell wall.

Authors:  Jie Xiong; Lingyao An; Han Lu; Cheng Zhu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Differential Effects of Nitrogen Forms on Cell Wall Phosphorus Remobilization Are Mediated by Nitric Oxide, Pectin Content, and Phosphate Transporter Expression.

Authors:  Chun Quan Zhu; Xiao Fang Zhu; An Yong Hu; Chao Wang; Bin Wang; Xiao Ying Dong; Ren-Fang Shen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 10.  Root branching responses to phosphate and nitrate.

Authors:  Thierry Desnos
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 7.834

View more
  11 in total

1.  Abscisic acid is involved in root cell wall phosphorus remobilization independent of nitric oxide and ethylene in rice (Oryza sativa).

Authors:  Xiao Fang Zhu; Xu Sheng Zhao; Qi Wu; Ren Fang Shen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Reciprocal Interactions between Cadmium-Induced Cell Wall Responses and Oxidative Stress in Plants.

Authors:  Christophe Loix; Michiel Huybrechts; Jaco Vangronsveld; Marijke Gielen; Els Keunen; Ann Cuypers
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 3.  Gasotransmitters in Action: Nitric Oxide-Ethylene Crosstalk during Plant Growth and Abiotic Stress Responses.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kolbert; Gábor Feigl; Luciano Freschi; Péter Poór
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-08

4.  Carbon Dioxide Improves Phosphorus Nutrition by Facilitating the Remobilization of Phosphorus From the Shoot Cell Wall in Rice (Oryza sativa).

Authors:  Xiao Fang Zhu; Xiao Long Zhang; Xiao Ying Dong; Ren Fang Shen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  An Update on Nitric Oxide Production and Role Under Phosphorus Scarcity in Plants.

Authors:  Andrea Galatro; Facundo Ramos-Artuso; Melisa Luquet; Agustina Buet; Marcela Simontacchi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Can Promote Brassica napus L. and Arabidopsis thaliana L. Root Hair Development through Nitric Oxide and Ethylene Pathways.

Authors:  Gan Zhao; Yingying Zhao; Wang Lou; Dyaaaldin Abdalmegeed; Rongzhan Guan; Wenbiao Shen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Molecular functions of nitric oxide and its potential applications in horticultural crops.

Authors:  Chengliang Sun; Yuxue Zhang; Lijuan Liu; Xiaoxia Liu; Baohai Li; Chongwei Jin; Xianyong Lin
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.793

8.  Can NO Signaling and Its Metabolism Be Used to Improve Nutrient Use Efficiency? Toward a Research Agenda.

Authors:  Agustina Buet; Melisa Luquet; Guillermo E Santa-María; Andrea Galatro
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Ethylene and Nitric Oxide Involvement in the Regulation of Fe and P Deficiency Responses in Dicotyledonous Plants.

Authors:  María José García; Carlos Lucena; Francisco Javier Romera
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Molecular Mechanisms of Acclimatization to Phosphorus Starvation and Recovery Underlying Full-Length Transcriptome Profiling in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  Panrong Ren; Yaxiong Meng; Baochun Li; Xiaole Ma; Erjing Si; Yong Lai; Juncheng Wang; Lirong Yao; Ke Yang; Xunwu Shang; Huajun Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.