Literature DB >> 28063663

Why Good Is More Alike Than Bad: Processing Implications.

Hans Alves1, Alex Koch2, Christian Unkelbach3.   

Abstract

Humans process positive information and negative information differently. These valence asymmetries in processing are often summarized under the observation that 'bad is stronger than good', meaning that negative information has stronger psychological impact (e.g., in feedback, learning, or social interactions). This stronger impact is usually attributed to people's affective or motivational reactions to evaluative information. We present an alternative interpretation of valence asymmetries based on the observation that positive information is more similar than negative information. We explain this higher similarity based on the non-extremity of positive attributes, discuss how it accounts for observable valence asymmetries in cognitive processing, and show how it predicts hitherto undiscovered phenomena.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affect; cognition; similarity; valence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28063663     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  15 in total

1.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Slower perception of time in depressed and suicidal patients.

Authors:  Ricardo Cáceda; Jessica M Carbajal; Ronald M Salomon; Jordan E Moore; Greg Perlman; Prasad R Padala; Abdullah Hasan; Pedro L Delgado
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.600

3.  Informant Report of Financial Capacity for Individuals With Chronic Acquired Brain Injury: An Assessment of Informant Accuracy.

Authors:  Preeti Sunderaraman; Stephanie Cosentino; Karen Lindgren; Angela James; Maria Schultheis
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.710

Review 4.  Valuing what happens: a biogenic approach to valence and (potentially) affect.

Authors:  Pamela Lyon; Franz Kuchling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Exploring Affective Priming Effect of Emotion-Label Words and Emotion-Laden Words: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Chenggang Wu; Juan Zhang; Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-27

6.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Contextual valence modulates the effect of choice on incentive processing.

Authors:  Shuting Mei; Wei Yi; Shiyu Zhou; Xun Liu; Ya Zheng
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Tracking Affective Language Comprehension: Simulating and Evaluating Character Affect in Morally Loaded Narratives.

Authors:  Björn 't Hart; Marijn E Struiksma; Anton van Boxtel; Jos J A van Berkum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-22

9.  Female Advantage in Automatic Change Detection of Facial Expressions During a Happy-Neutral Context: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Qi Li; Shiyu Zhou; Ya Zheng; Xun Liu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  How effective are films in inducing positive and negative emotional states? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luz Fernández-Aguilar; Beatriz Navarro-Bravo; Jorge Ricarte; Laura Ros; Jose Miguel Latorre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.