Oliver Bissinger1, Florian Andreas Probst2, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff1, Anke Jeschke3, Jochen Weitz1, Herbert Deppe1, Andreas Kolk1,4. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Institute of Molecular Immunology - Experimental Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: The bone implant contact (BIC) has traditionally been evaluated with histological methods. Thereupon, strong correlations of two-dimensional (2D) BIC have been detected between μCT and destructive histology. However, due to the high intra-sample variability in BIC values, one histological slice is not sufficient to represent 3D BIC. Therefore, our aim has been to correlate the averaged values of 3-4 histological sections to 3D μCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four implants inserted into the maxilla of 14 minipigs were evaluated. Two different time points were selected to assess the 3D BIC (distance to implant: 2-5 voxels), an inner ring (6-30 voxels) and an outer ring (55-100 voxels) using μCT (voxel size: 10 μm) and to correlate the values to histomorphometry. RESULTS: Strong correlations (p < 0.0001; 28 days, 56 days, total) were seen between μCT and histomorphometry concerning BIC (r = 0.84, r = 0.85, r = 0.83), the inner ring (r = 0.87, r = 0.87, r = 0.88) and the outer ring (r = 0.85, r = 0.85, r = 0.88). Closer to the implant, μCT values were higher compared with histomorphometry. CONCLUSION: Although 3-4 histological slices per implant seem to predict the 3D BIC, μCT might be advantageous because of its non-destructive 3D character. The healing time may not impact on the comparability.
AIM: The bone implant contact (BIC) has traditionally been evaluated with histological methods. Thereupon, strong correlations of two-dimensional (2D) BIC have been detected between μCT and destructive histology. However, due to the high intra-sample variability in BIC values, one histological slice is not sufficient to represent 3D BIC. Therefore, our aim has been to correlate the averaged values of 3-4 histological sections to 3D μCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four implants inserted into the maxilla of 14 minipigs were evaluated. Two different time points were selected to assess the 3D BIC (distance to implant: 2-5 voxels), an inner ring (6-30 voxels) and an outer ring (55-100 voxels) using μCT (voxel size: 10 μm) and to correlate the values to histomorphometry. RESULTS: Strong correlations (p < 0.0001; 28 days, 56 days, total) were seen between μCT and histomorphometry concerning BIC (r = 0.84, r = 0.85, r = 0.83), the inner ring (r = 0.87, r = 0.87, r = 0.88) and the outer ring (r = 0.85, r = 0.85, r = 0.88). Closer to the implant, μCT values were higher compared with histomorphometry. CONCLUSION: Although 3-4 histological slices per implant seem to predict the 3D BIC, μCT might be advantageous because of its non-destructive 3D character. The healing time may not impact on the comparability.
Authors: Dandan Song; Sohaib Shujaat; Yan Huang; Jeroen Van Dessel; Constantinus Politis; Ivo Lambrichts; Reinhilde Jacobs Journal: Int J Implant Dent Date: 2021-02-18
Authors: Lukas Postl; Thomas Mücke; Stefan Hunger; Oliver Bissinger; Michael Malek; Svenia Holberg; Rainer Burgkart; Stefan Krennmair Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Seong Ryoung Kim; Keon Mo Lee; Jin Hong Kim; Young Jin Choi; Han Ick Park; Hwa Chul Jung; Hyung Jin Roh; Jee Hye Lo Han; Joon Rae Kim; Bu-Kyu Lee Journal: Biomater Res Date: 2022-07-06
Authors: Sándor Farkasdi; Dávid Pammer; Róbert Rácz; Gergely Hriczó-Koperdák; Bence Tamás Szabó; Csaba Dobó-Nagy; Beáta Kerémi; József Blazsek; Frederic Cuisinier; Gang Wu; Gábor Varga Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.573