| Literature DB >> 28061775 |
Kai-Jen Hsueh1,2, Li-Ting Cheng2, Jai-Wei Lee3, Yao-Chi Chung2, Wen-Bin Chung4, Chun-Yen Chu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus suis (S. suis) causes arthritis, meningitis, septicemia, and sudden death in pigs and is also an zoonotic agent for humans. The present study demonstrated that immunization with recombinant Sao-L (surface antigen one-L, rSao-L) protein from a strain of S. suis serotype 2 in pigs was able to increase cross-serotype protection against S. suis serotype 1 and 2 challenge. Since weaning piglets are more susceptible to S. suis infections due to the stresses associated with weaning, prepartum immunization in sows may convey passive immunity to piglets and provide protection.Entities:
Keywords: Cytokine; Passive immunity; Streptococcus suis; Vaccine; rSao
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28061775 PMCID: PMC5219745 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0937-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fever and bacteremia of piglets after challenge with heterologous Streptococcus suis serotype 1 bacteria
| Groupa | Cases of fever/ bacteremiab (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Vaccinationc | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/33 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Control | 0/0 | 33 d/100 | 33 e/100 | 0/0 f | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
aVaccination: S. suis 2 + rSao, Control: sterile saline
bThe fever and bacteremia of piglets were monitored daily for 7 days after challenge
cDifferences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test P = 0.0584
dBody Temperature≧40 °C,e Body Temperature≧41 °C
fOne death occurred on the third day after challenge. The presence of S. suis serotype
1 bacteria was confirmed by bacteriology and multiplex PCR
Fig. 1Detection of Sao and cps II genes in bacteremia samples by multiplex PCR. M: 100 bp DNA Ladder; Lane 1–6: n of 3 on day 1 and 2 after challenge as control group; Lane 7: Vaccinated group, two days after challenge; Lane 8: S. suis serotype 1 as the positive control
Fever and bacteremia of pig after challenge with homologous Streptococcus suis serotype 2 bacteria
| Groupa | Cases of fever / bacteremiab (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Vaccinationc | 0/0 | 33/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 33/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Control | 0/0 | 33d/0 | 33 /0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/33 |
aVaccination: S. suis 2 + rSao, Control: sterile saline
bThe fever and bacteremia of piglets were monitored daily for 7 days after challenge
cDifferences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test P = 0.140
dBody Temperature≧40 °C
Fig. 2The antibody response of (a) S. suis 2 (b) rSao-specific IgG in the serum of piglets from sows with or without (n = 5 each) prepartum immunization with inactivated S. suis 2 + rSao. Data are represented as Mean ± SEM of peak absorbance values as determined by indirect ELISA performed on diluted (1:500) serum samples. S/P ratio = (sample – Nˉx) / (PCˉx – NCˉx). Differences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test, statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in comparison to the control group
Fig. 3The concentration of cytokine (a) IFN-γ (b) IL-4 (c) IL-6 (d) IL-12 (e) IL-8 (f) TNF-α in piglets from sows with or without (n = 5 each) prepartum immunization with inactivated S. suis 2 + rSao. Data are represented as Mean ± SEM of the serum concentration of each cytokines determined by MILLPLEX® MAP Kit. Differences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test, statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in comparison to the control group
Percentage of pathological lesion score after challenge with heterologous Streptococcus suis serotype 1 bacteria
| Groupa | Total Score | Reduced Percentage | The Score of Gross Lesionsb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain | Serosa | Joint | Spleen | Liver | Lung | |||
| Vaccination | 7 | 75%c | 1 (1/3) | 0 (0/3) | 3 (1/3) | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 3 (1/3) |
| Controld | 27 |
| 1 (1/3) | 7 (3/3) | 7 (3/3) | 1 (1/3) | 4 (2/3) | 7 (3/3) |
aVaccination: S. suis2 + rSao, Control: sterile saline
bNo lesion = 0, lesion area <33% = 1, lesion area 33–66% = 3, lesion area >66% = 5
cDifferences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test P < 0.05
dThe number of piglets in a group that was confirmed to have the presence of S
suis serotype 1 bacteria
Percentage of pathological lesion score after challenge with homologous Streptococcus suis serotype 2 bacteria
| Groupa | Total Score | Reduced Percentage | The Score of Gross Lesionsb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain | Serosa | Joint | Spleen | Liver | Lung | |||
| Vaccination | 4 | 81.0%e | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 4 (2/3) |
| Controld | 21 |
| 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 5 (3/3) | 3 (3/3) | 13 (3/3) |
aVaccination: S. suis2 + rSao, Control: sterile saline
bNo lesion = 0, lesion area <33% = 1, lesion area 33– 66% = 3, lesion area >66% = 5
cDifferences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test P < 0.05
dThe number of piglets in a group that was confirmed to have the presence of S
suis serotype 2 bacteria
Fig. 4Results of histopathological examination. Piglets from sows with or without prepartum immunization with inactivated S. suis 2 + rSao were challenged with (a) heterologous S. sui serotype 1 and (b) homologous S. sui serotype 2 bacteria at the 5 weeks of age. The histopathological examination was performed on the 7th day after the challenge. Control pigs manifested severe brain and lung lesions, including slight vascular congestion on the brain meninges and shedded epithelial cells in the lung alveolar space