Literature DB >> 28060237

A Comparison of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants from 2006 to 2014: Data from the National Resident Matching Program.

John B Schrock1, Matthew J Kraeutler, Michael R Dayton, Eric C McCarty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Association of American Medical Colleges publishes residency match data and reports through the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) every year. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in orthopaedic surgery residency matching data and characteristics of successful applicants to counsel medical students with regard to their chances of matching.
METHODS: The annual reports of the NRMP were searched annually from 2006 to 2014 to determine the number of orthopaedic surgery residency positions available, the number of applicants, and the match rate among applicants. Comparisons were performed between matched applicants and unmatched applicants with regard to the number of contiguous ranks and distinct specialties, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, number of research experiences and research products (abstracts, presentations, posters, publications), and proportion of Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Honor Medical Society members and students at a top-40, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded medical school.
RESULTS: The number of orthopaedic surgery positions available and number of applicants increased at a mean rate of 9 positions and 65 applicants per year (p = 0.11). The mean number of contiguous ranks for U.S. senior medical students was 11.5 for those who matched and 5.5 for those who did not match (p < 0.0001). The USMLE scores for applicants who matched were significantly greater than for those who did not match in each category: Step-1 scores for U.S. seniors (p < 0.001) and independent applicants (p = 0.039), and Step-2 scores for U.S. seniors (p < 0.01) and independent applicants (p = 0.026). The mean number of research products was significantly greater for matched U.S. seniors compared with unmatched U.S. seniors (p = 0.035). A significantly higher proportion of matched U.S. seniors compared with unmatched U.S. seniors were AOA members and students at a top-40, NIH-funded medical school (both p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Successful applicants in the Match for orthopaedic surgery residency have higher USMLE Step-1 and 2 scores, number of research experiences and research products, and contiguous ranks. A higher proportion of successful applicants are AOA members and students at a top-40, NIH-funded medical school.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28060237     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Current State of Research Gap-Years in Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants: Program Directors' Perspectives.

Authors:  Eric J Cotter; Evan M Polce; Kathryn L Williams; Andrea M Spiker; Brian F Grogan; Gerald J Lang
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

2.  How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021?

Authors:  Adam M Gordon; Charles A Conway; Bhavya K Sheth; Matthew L Magruder; Rushabh M Vakharia; William N Levine; Afshin E Razi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Analysis of factors affecting Canadian medical students' success in the residency match.

Authors:  Joshua Lakoff; Kelly Howse; Nicholas Cofie; Sylvia Heeneman; Nancy Dalgarno
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-07-15

4.  Authorship and study characteristic trends in spine publications from years 2004 to 2017.

Authors:  Madison Goss; Sarah McNutt; Jesse Bible
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

5.  CORR® Curriculum-Orthopaedic Education: Changing USMLE Step 1 Scores to Pass/Fail Removes an Objective Measure of Medical Knowledge.

Authors:  Paul J Dougherty
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.

Authors:  Selina C Poon; Kate Nellans; Prakash Gorroochurn; Nadeen O Chahine
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-12-20       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Interviews: Structure and Organization of the Interview Day.

Authors:  Brett D Haislup; Matthew J Kraeutler; Rishi Baweja; Eric C McCarty; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Determining the Most Important Factors Involved in Ranking Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.

Authors:  Rishi Baweja; Matthew J Kraeutler; Mary K Mulcahey; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-09

9.  International Medical Graduates in the US Plastic Surgery Residency: Characteristics of Successful Applicants.

Authors:  George Kokosis; Angelo A Leto Barone; Michael J Grzelak; Sara Alfadil; Edward H Davidson; Scott Lifchez; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  The Impact of COVID-19 on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process.

Authors:  Amiethab A Aiyer; Caroline J Granger; Kyle L McCormick; Cara A Cipriano; Jonathan R Kaplan; Matthew A Varacallo; Seth D Dodds; William N Levine
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.