Literature DB >> 28060231

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy from the Prospective ANCHOR Cohort Study.

John C Clohisy1, Jeffrey Ackerman, Geneva Baca, Jack Baty, Paul E Beaulé, Young-Jo Kim, Michael B Millis, David A Podeszwa, Perry L Schoenecker, Rafael J Sierra, Ernest L Sink, Daniel J Sucato, Robert T Trousdale, Ira Zaltz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current literature describing the periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is mostly limited to retrospective case series. Larger, prospective cohort studies are needed to provide better clinical evidence regarding this procedure. The goals of the current study were to (1) report minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes (pain, hip function, activity, overall health, and quality of life), (2) investigate preoperative clinical and disease characteristics as predictors of clinical outcomes, and (3) report the rate of early failures and reoperations in patients undergoing contemporary PAO surgery.
METHODS: A large, prospective, multicenter cohort of PAO procedures was established, and outcomes at a minimum of 2 years were analyzed. A total of 391 hips were included for analysis (79% of the patients were female, and the average patient age was 25.4 years). Patient-reported outcomes, conversion to total hip replacement, reoperations, and major complications were documented. Variables with a p value of ≤0.10 in the univariate linear regressions were included in the multivariate linear regression. The backward stepwise selection method was used to determine the final risk factors of clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Clinical outcome analysis demonstrated major clinically important improvements in pain, function, quality of life, overall health, and activity level. Increasing age and a body mass index status of overweight or obese were predictive of improved results for certain outcome metrics. Male sex and mild acetabular dysplasia were predictive of lesser improvements in certain outcome measures. Three (0.8%) of the hips underwent early conversion to total hip arthroplasty, 12 (3%) required reoperation, and 26 (7%) experienced a major complication.
CONCLUSIONS: This large, prospective cohort study demonstrated the clinical success of contemporary PAO surgery for the treatment of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Patient and disease characteristics demonstrated predictive value that should be considered in surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28060231      PMCID: PMC5198872          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  39 in total

1.  Periacetabular osteotomy without abductor dissection using direct anterior exposure.

Authors:  S B Murphy; M B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are there sex-dependent differences in acetabular dysplasia characteristics?

Authors:  Stephen T Duncan; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Geneva Baca; Perry L Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bernese periacetabular osteotomy in males: is there an increased risk of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  K Ziebarth; J Balakumar; S Domayer; Y J Kim; M B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy.

Authors:  R Biedermann; L Donnan; A Gabriel; R Wachter; M Krismer; H Behensky
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Femoral deformity in adults with developmental hip dysplasia.

Authors:  D D Robertson; J R Essinger; S Imura; Y Kuroki; T Sakamaki; T Shimizu; S Tanaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: review of reported outcomes and the early experience at the University of Iowa.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

9.  The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric; J K Salama; T Ochi; H S Tullos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-07

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  50 in total

1.  [Periacetabular osteotomy-what influence does age have on patient-relevant results? : A prospective 5‑year investigation].

Authors:  L Franken; F Thielemann; A Postler; S Blum; A Hartmann; K-P Günther; J Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Daud Tai Shan Chou; Lucian Bogdan Solomon; Kerry Costi; Susan Pannach; Oksana Tamara Holubowycz; Donald William Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Evaluation and Treatment of Borderline Dysplasia: Moving Beyond the Lateral Center Edge Angle.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Michael P McClincy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

4.  Combined Surgical Approach to Young Adults with Hip Dysplasia and Concomitant Intra-Articular Pathology Using Intra-Abdominal Monitoring.

Authors:  Robert J Wetzel; Noah M Joseph; Derrick M Knapik; Jonathan Copp; Michael J Salata
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

5.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?

Authors:  Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is There an Association Between Borderline-to-mild Dysplasia and Hip Osteoarthritis? Analysis of CT Osteoabsorptiometry.

Authors:  Tohru Irie; Daisuke Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Asano; Ryuta Arai; Muhammad Alaa Terkawi; Yoichi M Ito; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Editorial Comment: Selected Proceedings from the 2020 Bernese Hip Symposium.

Authors:  Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Medialization of the Hip's Center with Periacetabular Osteotomy: Validation of Assessment with Plain Radiographs.

Authors:  Lucas M Fowler; Jeffrey J Nepple; Clarabelle Devries; Michael D Harris; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Prominent Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Morphologies Are Common in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Douglas Nestorovski; Marcin Wasko; Lucas M Fowler; Michael D Harris; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip MRI findings and outcomes following imaging-guided hip injections.

Authors:  Laura Pochon; Cynthia K Peterson; Reto Sutter; Filippo Del Grande; Erika J Ulbrich; Christian W Pfirrmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.