Literature DB >> 28058623

Replacement of Amlodipine and Lercanidipine by Barnidipine: Tolerability and Effectiveness in a Real-Life Study.

Robert Lins1, Yves Haerden2, Caroline de Vries3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. Calcium channel blockers are an effective antihypertensive treatment, but frequently hypertension remains uncontrolled for many patients, partly due to tolerability issues. AIM: To assess the tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from other calcium channel blockers in daily practice.
METHODS: BASIC-HT, a prospective real life study, enrolled 20,479 hypertensive patients initiating barnidipine treatment. The present paper focuses on a subgroup of patients in BASIC-HT for whom the previous treatment with amlodipine or lercanidipine was replaced by barnidipine. Tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in these patients were assessed at two visits during a 3-month follow up.
RESULTS: In 1710 mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from amlodipine or lercanidipine to barnidipine monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drug classes, mean blood pressure decreased during 3-month follow-up. The mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 153.15 mmHg [95% CI 152.35-153.95] at baseline to 139.20 mmHg [95% CI 138.58-139.82] at visit 3, after 3 months. The mean diastolic blood pressure decreased from 88.85 mmHg at baseline [95% CI 88.36-89.34], to 81.56 mmHg [95% CI 81.20-81.91] at visit 3. Among these patients, 65.4% replaced their initial calcium channel blocker treatment to barnidipine for tolerability reasons. During the follow-up, the main adverse event reported was edema (4.8%). The nature and frequency of events reported in this subgroup of switcher patients were in line with those reported by the total population in BASIC-HT.
CONCLUSION: This real-life study suggests that replacement of other calcium channel blockers with barnidipine is a valuable therapeutic option, especially when tolerability is an issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barnidipine; Calcium channel blockers; Hypertension; Observational study; Treatment switch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28058623     DOI: 10.1007/s40292-016-0177-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev        ISSN: 1120-9879


  34 in total

1.  Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jamerson; Oliseyenum Nwose; Lisa Jean-Louis; Lesley Schofield; Das Purkayastha; Michelle Baron
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Pharmacological differences between calcium antagonists.

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Turnbull; B Neal; T Ninomiya; C Algert; H Arima; F Barzi; C Bulpitt; J Chalmers; R Fagard; A Gleason; S Heritier; N Li; V Perkovic; M Woodward; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

Review 4.  Barnidipine, a long-acting slow onset calcium antagonist.

Authors:  C Korstanje
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract Suppl       Date:  2000-11

5.  Pilot study to evaluate a water displacement technique to compare effects of diuretics and ACE inhibitors to alleviate lower extremity edema due to dihydropyridine calcium antagonists.

Authors:  M R Weir; C Rosenberger; J C Fink
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Efficacy and safety of barnidipine compared with felodipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese patients.

Authors:  C S Liau; K L Chien; C L Chao; T M Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Tolerability of long-term treatment with lercanidipine versus amlodipine and lacidipine in elderly hypertensives.

Authors:  Gastone Leonetti; Bruno Magnani; Achille Cesare Pessina; Alessandro Rappelli; Bruno Trimarco; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Antihypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rossetti; Samuele Pizzocri; Francesco Brasca; Marta Pozzi; Laura M Beltrami; Giovanni B Bolla; Roberta Famiani; Barbara Caimi; Stefano Omboni; Fabio Magrini; Stefano Carugo
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2008-06

9.  Distinct vasodilation, without reflex neurohormonal activation, induced by barnidipine in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  L Argenziano; R Izzo; G Iovino; N De Luca; L Parrella; C Morisco; B Trimarco
Journal:  Blood Press Suppl       Date:  1998

Review 10.  Lercanidipine in hypertension.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2005
View more
  2 in total

1.  Calcium Channel Blockers for the Clinical Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-10-11

Review 2.  How to Improve Effectiveness and Adherence to Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: Central Role of Dihydropyridinic Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension.

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Giovambattista Desideri; Elisa Roca; Calogero Calcullo; Massimo Crippa; Nicola De Luca; Giovanni Vincenzo Gaudio; Laura Maria Lonati; Leo Orselli; Angelo Scuteri; Vito Vulpis; Benedetto Acone; Augusto Zaninelli
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-12-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.