Literature DB >> 28056665

The patient perspective on the effects of medical record accessibility: a systematic review.

Peter Vermeir1,2, Sophie Degroote2,3, Dominique Vandijck2,3,4, Hanne Van Tiggelen3, Renaat Peleman1,2, Rik Verhaeghe3, An Mariman2, Dirk Vogelaers1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care is shifting from a paternalistic to a participatory model, with increasing patient involvement. Medical record accessibility to patients may contribute significantly to patient comanagement.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature on the patient perspective of effects of personal medical record accessibility on the individual patient, patient-physician relationship and quality of medical care.
METHODS: Screening of PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library on the keywords 'medical record', 'patient record', 'communication', 'patient participation', 'doctor-patient relationship', 'physician-patient relationship' between 1 January 2002 and 31 January 2016; systematic review after assessment for methodological quality.
RESULTS: Out of 557 papers screened, only 12 studies qualified for the systematic review. Only a minority of patients spontaneously request access to their medical file, in contrast to frequent awareness of this patient right and the fact that patients in general have a positive view on open visit notes. The majority of those who have actually consulted their file are positive about this experience. Access to personal files improves adequacy and efficiency of communication between physician and patient, in turn facilitating decision-making and self-management. Increased documentation through patient involvement and feedback on the medical file reduces medical errors, in turn increasing satisfaction and quality of care. Information improvement through personal medical file accessibility increased reassurance and a sense of involvement and responsibility.
CONCLUSION: From the patient perspective medical record accessibility contributes to co-management of personal health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Doctor–patient relationship; Medical record; Participation; Patient; Patient record; Physician–patient relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28056665     DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2016.1275375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Clin Belg        ISSN: 1784-3286            Impact factor:   1.264


  10 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Patients' Use of Electronic Personal Health Records in England: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Bridgette M Bewick; Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Tracey Farragher; Peter Gardner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 2.  How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Janine Benjamins; Annemien Haveman-Nies; Marian Gunnink; Annemieke Goudkuil; Emely de Vet
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Patients' Perspectives About Factors Affecting Their Use of Electronic Personal Health Records in England: Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Zeineb Safi; Bridgette M Bewick; Mowafa Househ; Peter H Gardner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: A systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Ehsan Ahsani-Estahbanati; Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev; Leila Doshmangir
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Patient participation in electronic nursing documentation: An interview study among home-care patients.

Authors:  Kim De Groot; Judith Douma; Wolter Paans; Anneke L Francke
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.318

6.  DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Lora J H Bean; Maren T Scheuner; Michael F Murray; Leslie G Biesecker; Robert C Green; Kristin G Monaghan; Glenn E Palomaki; Richard R Sharp; Tracy L Trotter; Michael S Watson; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hanne Støre Valeur; Anne Kveim Lie; Kåre Moen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Towards an Adoption Framework for Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Systematic Literature Mapping Study.

Authors:  Hugo J T van Mens; Ruben D Duijm; Remko Nienhuis; Nicolette F de Keizer; Ronald Cornet
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-03-30

9.  Patients' Adoption of Electronic Personal Health Records in England: Secondary Data Analysis.

Authors:  Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Ali Abdallah Alalwan; Brian McMillan; Bridgette M Bewick; Mowafa Househ; Alaa T Al-Zyadat
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  "Do I want to know it all?" A qualitative study of glioma patients' perspectives on receiving information about their diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Annika Malmström; Lisa Åkesson; Peter Milos; Munila Mudaisi; Helena Bruhn; Michael Strandeus; Marit Karlsson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.603

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.