| Literature DB >> 28055261 |
Matthias Rösslein1, Neill J Liptrott2, Andrew Owen2, Patrick Boisseau3, Peter Wick1, Inge K Herrmann1.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has transformed materials engineering. However, despite much excitement in the scientific community, translation of nanotechnology-based developments has suffered from significant translational gaps, particularly in the field of biomedicine. Of the many concepts investigated, very few have entered routine clinical application. Safety concerns and associated socioeconomic uncertainties, together with the lack of incentives for technology transfer, are undoubtedly imposing significant hurdles to effective clinical translation of potentially game-changing developments. Commercialisation aspects are only rarely considered in the early stages and in many cases, the market is not identified early on in the process, hence precluding market-oriented development. However, methodologies and in-depth understanding of mechanistic processes existing in the environmental, health and safety (EHS) community could be leveraged to accelerate translation. Here, we discuss the most important stepping stones for (nano)medicine development along with a number of suggestions to facilitate future translation.Entities:
Keywords: Environmental toxicology; nanomedicine; particle characterisation; risk assessment; translation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28055261 DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1279361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanotoxicology ISSN: 1743-5390 Impact factor: 5.913