Literature DB >> 28055070

Modeling Contagion Through Social Networks to Explain and Predict Gunshot Violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014.

Ben Green1, Thibaut Horel1, Andrew V Papachristos2.   

Abstract

Importance: Every day in the United States, more than 200 people are murdered or assaulted with a firearm. Little research has considered the role of interpersonal ties in the pathways through which gun violence spreads. Objective: To evaluate the extent to which the people who will become subjects of gun violence can be predicted by modeling gun violence as an epidemic that is transmitted between individuals through social interactions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was an epidemiological analysis of a social network of individuals who were arrested during an 8-year period in Chicago, Illinois, with connections between people who were arrested together for the same offense. Modeling of the spread of gunshot violence over the network was assessed using a probabilistic contagion model that assumed individuals were subject to risks associated with being arrested together, in addition to demographic factors, such as age, sex, and neighborhood residence. Participants represented a network of 138 163 individuals who were arrested between January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2014 (29.9% of all individuals arrested in Chicago during this period), 9773 of whom were subjects of gun violence. Individuals were on average 27 years old at the midpoint of the study, predominantly male (82.0%) and black (75.6%), and often members of a gang (26.2%). Main Outcomes and Measures: Explanation and prediction of becoming a subject of gun violence (fatal or nonfatal) using epidemic models based on person-to-person transmission through a social network.
Results: Social contagion accounted for 63.1% of the 11 123 gunshot violence episodes; subjects of gun violence were shot on average 125 days after their infector (the person most responsible for exposing the subject to gunshot violence). Some subjects of gun violence were shot more than once. Models based on both social contagion and demographics performed best; when determining the 1.0% of people (n = 1382) considered at highest risk to be shot each day, the combined model identified 728 subjects of gun violence (6.5%) compared with 475 subjects of gun violence (4.3%) for the demographics model (53.3% increase) and 589 subjects of gun violence (5.3%) for the social contagion model (23.6% increase). Conclusions and Relevance: Gunshot violence follows an epidemic-like process of social contagion that is transmitted through networks of people by social interactions. Violence prevention efforts that account for social contagion, in addition to demographics, have the potential to prevent more shootings than efforts that focus on only demographics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28055070     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  17 in total

1.  Youth exposure to violence involving a gun: evidence for adverse childhood experience classification.

Authors:  Sonali Rajan; Charles C Branas; Dawn Myers; Nina Agrawal
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-08-01

2.  Death and long-term disability after gun injury: a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sheharyar Raza; Deva Thiruchelvam; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-07-14

3.  Closer to Guns: the Role of Street Gangs in Facilitating Access to Illegal Firearms.

Authors:  Elizabeth Roberto; Anthony A Braga; Andrew V Papachristos
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Violent reinjury risk assessment instrument (VRRAI) for hospital-based violence intervention programs.

Authors:  Erik J Kramer; James Dodington; Ava Hunt; Terrell Henderson; Adaobi Nwabuo; Rochelle Dicker; Catherine Juillard
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Event-level prediction of urban crime reveals a signature of enforcement bias in US cities.

Authors:  Victor Rotaru; Yi Huang; Timmy Li; James Evans; Ishanu Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 6.  Agent-Based Modeling: an Underutilized Tool in Community Violence Research.

Authors:  Jason E Goldstick; Jonathan Jay
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  Commentary: Reducing youth firearm violence and the associated health disparities requires enhanced surveillance and modern behavioral intervention strategies - a commentary on Bottiani et al. (2021).

Authors:  Jason E Goldstick; Elinore J Kaufman; M Kit Delgado; Jonathan Jay; Patrick M Carter
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  Spatio-temporal patterns of gun violence in Syracuse, New York 2009-2015.

Authors:  David A Larsen; Sandra Lane; Timothy Jennings-Bey; Arnett Haygood-El; Kim Brundage; Robert A Rubinstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Cross-Sectional Study of Firearm Injuries in Emergency Department Patients.

Authors:  Heather de Anda; Taylor Dibble; Charles Schlaepfer; Randi Foraker; Kristen Mueller
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

10.  At the core of cyberaggression: A group-based explanation.

Authors:  Elena Trifiletti; Marco Giannini; Loris Vezzali; Soraya E Shamloo; Martina Faccini; Veronica M Cocco
Journal:  Aggress Behav       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.