Sheharyar Raza1, Deva Thiruchelvam1, Donald A Redelmeier2. 1. Department of Medicine (Raza, Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Raza, Thiruchelvam, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute; ICES in Ontario (Thiruchelvam); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Redelmeier), Toronto, Ont. 2. Department of Medicine (Raza, Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Raza, Thiruchelvam, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute; ICES in Ontario (Thiruchelvam); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Redelmeier), Toronto, Ont. dar@ices.on.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gun injury accounts for substantial acute mortality worldwide and many others survive with lingering disabilities. We investigated whether additional health losses beyond mortality can also arise for patients who survive with long-term disability. METHODS: We conducted a population-based individual patient analysis of adults injured by firearms who had received emergency medical care in Ontario, Canada, from Apr. 1, 2002, to Apr. 1, 2019. Longitudinal cohort analyses were evaluated through deterministic linkages of individual electronic patient files. The primary outcome was death or subsequent application for long-term disability in the years after hospital discharge. RESULTS: In total, 8313 patients were injured from firearms, of which 3020 were injured from intentional incidents and 5293 were injured from unintentional incidents. A total of 2657 (88.0%) patients with intentional gun injury and 5089 (96.1%) patients with unintentional gun injury survived initial injuries. After a mean 7.75 years of follow-up, patients surviving intentional injuries had a disability rate twice as high as patients surviving unintentional injuries (19.7% v. 10.1%, p < 0.001), equivalent to a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.80-2.25). The higher risk of long-term disability for survivors after intentional gun injury was not explained by demographic characteristics, extended to survivors treated and released from the emergency department, and was observed regardless of whether the incident was self-inflicted or from interpersonal assault. Half of the disability cases were identified after the first year. Additional predictors of long-term disability included a lower socioeconomic status, an urban home location, arrival by ambulance transport, a history of mental illness and a diagnosis of substance use disorder. INTERPRETATION: Our study shows that gun death statistics underestimate the extent of health losses from long-term disability, particularly for those with intentional injuries. Additional and sustainable follow-up medical care might improve patient outcomes. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND:Gun injury accounts for substantial acute mortality worldwide and many others survive with lingering disabilities. We investigated whether additional health losses beyond mortality can also arise for patients who survive with long-term disability. METHODS: We conducted a population-based individual patient analysis of adults injured by firearms who had received emergency medical care in Ontario, Canada, from Apr. 1, 2002, to Apr. 1, 2019. Longitudinal cohort analyses were evaluated through deterministic linkages of individual electronic patient files. The primary outcome was death or subsequent application for long-term disability in the years after hospital discharge. RESULTS: In total, 8313 patients were injured from firearms, of which 3020 were injured from intentional incidents and 5293 were injured from unintentional incidents. A total of 2657 (88.0%) patients with intentional gun injury and 5089 (96.1%) patients with unintentional gun injury survived initial injuries. After a mean 7.75 years of follow-up, patients surviving intentional injuries had a disability rate twice as high as patients surviving unintentional injuries (19.7% v. 10.1%, p < 0.001), equivalent to a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.80-2.25). The higher risk of long-term disability for survivors after intentional gun injury was not explained by demographic characteristics, extended to survivors treated and released from the emergency department, and was observed regardless of whether the incident was self-inflicted or from interpersonal assault. Half of the disability cases were identified after the first year. Additional predictors of long-term disability included a lower socioeconomic status, an urban home location, arrival by ambulance transport, a history of mental illness and a diagnosis of substance use disorder. INTERPRETATION: Our study shows that gun death statistics underestimate the extent of health losses from long-term disability, particularly for those with intentional injuries. Additional and sustainable follow-up medical care might improve patient outcomes. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Abdulmajeed Altoijry; Mohammed Al-Omran; Thomas F Lindsay; K Wayne Johnston; Magda Melo; Muhammad Mamdani Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Giana H Davidson; Christian A Hamlat; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Gregory J Jurkovich; Saman Arbabi Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jason E Goldstick; Patrick M Carter; Maureen A Walton; Linda L Dahlberg; Steven A Sumner; Marc A Zimmerman; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David A Larsen; Sandra Lane; Timothy Jennings-Bey; Arnett Haygood-El; Kim Brundage; Robert A Rubinstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ellicott C Matthay; Jessica Galin; Kara E Rudolph; Kriszta Farkas; Garen J Wintemute; Jennifer Ahern Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 25.391