Literature DB >> 28054997

Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of Indol-3-yl-oxoacetamides as Potent Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Ligands.

Rareş-Petru Moldovan1, Winnie Deuther-Conrad2, Andrew G Horti3, Peter Brust4.   

Abstract

A small series of indol-3-yl-oxoacetamides was synthesized starting from the literature known N-(adamantan-1-yl)-2-(5-(furan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (5) by substituting the 1-pentyl-1H-indole subunit. Our preliminary biological evaluation showed that the fluorinated derivative 8 is a potent and selective CB₂ ligand with Ki = 6.2 nM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding affinity; cannabinoid receptor type 2; indole; positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28054997      PMCID: PMC6155603          DOI: 10.3390/molecules22010077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

For centuries, Cannabis sativa was used as medicinal plant for the treatment of pain and inflammatory processes. The discovery by Gaoni and Mechoulam [1] of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)—the primary psychoactive ingredient in Cannabis sativa—set the stage for the identification of the endogenous cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) transmitter system in the brain. The endocannabinoid system consists of cannabinoid (CB) receptors, endogenous ligands (e.g., anandamide, 2-O-arachidonoylglycerol) that activate the CB receptors, and the enzymes, which are responsible for the biosynthesis (e.g., N-acyltransferase, diacylglycerol lipase) and deactivation (e.g., fatty acid amide hydrolases, monoacylglycerol lipases) of the endogenous ligands [2,3]. Two types of specific Gi/o-protein-coupled CB receptors were cloned in the 1990s, termed CB1 and CB2 receptor [4,5]. CB1 receptors are abundantly expressed in the central nervous system, and their function has been thoroughly investigated [6]. Recently, the crystal structure of the CB1 receptors has been reported, providing a tool for a more accurate pharmacological investigation of this receptor subtype [7,8]. In contrast to CB1 receptors, the CB2 receptor was originally regarded as a peripheral receptor predominantly expressed in cells of the immune system [5,9,10]. However, more recent investigations proved the presence of CB2 receptors in glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) [11,12], and oligodendroglial [13] progenitors in vitro, as well as in microglia [14] and neuronal progenitors [12] in normal mouse brain in vivo [15]. The predominant expression of the CB2 receptor in cells of the immune system suggests a modulation of diverse immune functions, including cytokine production, lymphocyte proliferation, and humoral and cell-mediated immune responses [16,17]. With respect to neuroinflammation, microglia adopt a key function. Under healthy conditions, the expression of CB2 receptors in the brain is rather low [18]. However, inflammatory effects result in considerably increased expression levels of CB2 receptors [19,20]. It was found that neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes in the brain related to, for example, depression, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or brain tumors such as glioblastoma are associated with an upregulation of CB2 receptor expression [18,21,22,23]. CB2 receptor agonists lead to a reduction of neuroinflammation and stimulation of neurogenesis. Therefore, the therapeutic potential of CB2 agonists is related to neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes [19,24]. Moreover, the availability of CB2 receptors as measured with positron emission tomography (PET) [25] could potentially be used as a biomarker for neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes in the brain [26,27,28,29]. Indole has been a very popular key building block for the medicinal chemistry of cannabinoid receptor ligands, and a large number of indole-derived CB2 selective ligands have been developed [30,31,32,33]. However, most of these ligands do not comply with the most important needs of a ligand suitable for the development of a tracer for CB2 brain imaging with PET; namely, high affinity towards CB2 (Ki(CB2) < 1 nM) and high selectivity over CB1 (Ki(CB2)/(CB1) > 500) [26,34]. Recently, we reported the development of a highly affine and selective 18F-labeled CB2 radiotracer (Ki(CB2) = 0.4 nM, Ki(CB1) = 380 nM), and proved its applicability in a mouse model of neuroinflammation [35]. However, this radioligand suffers from low metabolic stability in vivo, and therefore we redirected our focus on the structure of the literature known, highly affine N-(adamantan-1-yl)-2-(5-(furan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (5, Ki(CB2) = 0.37 nM and Ki(CB1) = 345 nM) [32] for the development of a CB2 radiotracer. In the present work, we show the synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of fluorine-containing indol-3-yl-oxoacetamide derivatives.

2. Results and Discussion

The structure–affinity relationship study which lead to the identification of compound 5 [32,36] (Scheme 1) and the work performed on the structurally related quinolinone-3-carboxamides as CB2 ligands [37] has proven the importance of the substitution pattern at the 5-indole position, and also the need of the lipophilic adamantane subunit. Herein, we investigate the possibility of introducing a fluorine atom by modifying the alkyl chain at the indole 1-position.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of the key building block 3, lead compound 5, and ether derivatives 6, 7, and 8; (a) oxalyl chloride, diethyl ether (Et2O), 0 °C to r.t., 1.5 h, 60%; (b) amantadine, triethylamine (Et3N), dichloromethane (DCM), r.t., 16 h, 82%; (c) 2-furanboronic acid, tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (Pd(PPh3)4), Na2CO3, EtOH, reflux, 14 h, 60%; (d) 1-bromobutane (n-BuBr), tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB), 20% aq. NaOH, DCM, r.t., 14 h, 72%; (e) bromo-alkyl reagent, KOH, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 90 °C, 6 h, 67%–72%; (f) NaH, methyl iodide (MeI) for 7 and Br(CH2)2F for 8, DMF, 0 °C to r.t., 6 h, 85%–90% [32].

The synthesis of the key building block 3 was performed as described in the literature [32] and depicted in Scheme 1. Treatment of 5-bromoindole (1) with oxalyl chloride delivered the corresponding indole-3-oxoacetyl chloride in ~60% yield, which was further reacted with amantadine (adamantan-1-amine) in presence of triethylamine (Et3N) to give compound 2. Next, Suzuki coupling was performed using the commercially available 2-furanboronic acid in presence of Pd(PPh3)4 and Na2CO3 to give 3. The lead molecule 5 [32] was synthesized by treating 3 with 1-bromobutane in basic reaction condition in ~25% yield over four steps starting from 1, as a light yellow solid. To overcome the high lipophilicity of the indole-N-alkyl chain [38], ether groups were introduced at this site of the molecule, and simultaneously, the influence of its length on the CB2 binding affinity was investigated. Thus, the glycol ether compound 6 was synthesized from 3 by using 2-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl-4-methylbenzenesulfonate [39,40] as alkylating reagent in 72% yield. Similarly, alcohol 4 was synthesized by reacting compound 3 with 2-bromethanol. Alcohol 4 was further etherified via Williamson ether synthesis [41] by using methyl iodide and 2-fluoro-1-bromoethane to give compounds 7 and 8, respectively (for 1H-NMR of compounds 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 see Supplementary Materials). The binding affinity towards CB2 receptors was determined in vitro by radioligand inhibition binding assays according to a recently published protocol [42,43] using cell membranes from CHO cells stably transfected with the human CB2 (Prof Paul L. Prather, University Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA), [3H]WIN55.212-2 as competitive radioligand (KD = 2.1 nM) and increasing concentrations (100 pM to 10 µM) of compounds 5, 6, 7, and 8 added in triplicate for each experiment. Non-specific binding was determined using 10 µM WIN55.212-2. The individual IC50 values were determined by non-linear curve fitting using GraphPad Prism software (version 3.0, GraphPhad, San Diego, CA, USA), and the corresponding Ki values calculated using the Cheng–Prusoff equation [44]. As shown by the Ki values in Figure 1b, we could not reproduce the reported sub-nanomolar CB2 affinity of the lead molecule (compound 5) [32], but recorded a Ki value of 8.5 nM instead. In addition, these values and the individual binding curves in Figure 1a illustrate that a similar low-nanomolar affinity was observed for the fluorinated derivative 8 (Ki = 6.2 nM), while slightly lower affinities were determined for compounds 6 and 7 (Ki = 27.3 nM, and Ki = 16.1 nM, respectively). Additionally, the binding affinities towards the CB1 receptor were investigated for compounds 6 and 8 by using [3H]CP55.40 as competitive radioligand. None of the two derivatives could displace [3H]CP55.40 from the human CB1 receptors up to a concentration of 100 µM. Thus, within this series of fluoro-substituted compounds, the N-alkyl chain of compound 8 is most suitable to obtain high affinity binding at the CB2 receptor, combined with an excellent selectivity against the CB1 receptor subtype.
Figure 1

(a) Individual competition binding curves of compounds 5, 6, 7, and 8. Inhibition of [3H]WIN55.212-2 binding by increasing concentrations (100 pM to 10 µM) of compounds 5, 6, 7, and 8 to membrane homogenates of CHO cells stably transfected with human CB2. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation of a triplicate in a single experiment; (b) Binding affinity (Ki) of compounds 5, 6, 7, and 8 for the human cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) receptor. a Values are means ± standard deviations of two to three experiments run in triplicate; b Ki of compound 5 as reported in [23].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

All reagents were used directly as obtained commercially, unless otherwise noted. Reaction progress was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using silica gel 60 F254 (0.040–0.063 mm) with detection by UV. All moisture-sensitive reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere using oven-dried glassware and anhydrous solvents. Column flash chromatography was carried out using E. Merck silica gel 60F (230–400 mesh) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Analytical TLC was performed on aluminum sheets coated with silica gel 60 F254 (0.25 mm thickness, E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). 1H-NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker-400 NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at nominal resonance frequencies of 400 MHz, in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 (referenced to internal Me4Si at δH 0 ppm). The chemical shifts (δ) were expressed in parts per million (ppm). High resolution mass spectra were recorded utilizing electrospray ionization (ESI) at the University of Notre Dame Mass Spectrometry facility.

3.2. Procedures and Compound Characterization

N-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2-(5-(furan-2-yl)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (4). 2-bromethanol (55 µL, 1.2 eq, 0.77 mmol) was added to a solution of 3 (300 mg, 1 eq, 0.64 mmol) in 5 mL N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at room temperature, followed by powder KOH (116 mg, 3 eq, 1.93 mmol), and the reaction mixture was warmed to 90 °C for 6 h. Saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution (15 mL) and ethyl acetate (EA, 15 mL) were added, and the phases were separated. The aqueous phase was washed 2 × EA (10 mL), the combined organic solutions were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated by rotary evaporation. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica, EA:Hex, 1/1) to give alcohol 4 (224 mg, 67% yield) as yellow solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 1.67–1.76 (m, 6H), 2.05–2.12 (m, 6H), 2.07–2.11 (m, 6H), 2.14 (br s, 3H), 2.41 (br s, 1H), 3.96–4.06 (t, J = 5.18 Hz, 2H), 4.31 (t, J = 5.18 Hz, 2H), 6.51 (dd, J = 3.28, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J = 3.28, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.40 (dd, J = 8.59, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (dd, J = 1.77, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J = 8.59, 1.52 Hz, 1H), 8.71 (dd, J = 1.77, 0.51 Hz, 1H), 8.99–9.10 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 29.36 (3C), 36.29 (3C), 41.15 (3C), 49.58, 51.84, 61.26, 104.42, 110.40, 111.72, 112.16, 118.02, 120.29, 126.77, 128.24, 135.74, 141.77, 142.03, 154.59, 161.48, 181.14. N-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2-(5-(furan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (5). This compound was obtained according to literature. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 0.86–0.94 (m, 3H), 1.28–1.44 (m, 4H), 1.69–1.81 (m, 6H), 1.93 (quin, J = 7.33 Hz, 2H), 2.10–2.20 (m, 9H), 4.16 (t, J = 7.33 Hz, 2H), 6.51 (dd, J = 3.28, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (dd, J = 3.28, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.44 (m, 2 H), 7.50 (dd, J = 1.89, 0.63 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (dd, J = 8.59, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 8.73–8.78 (m, 1H), 9.04 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 13.94, 22.29, 28.99, 29.38 (3C), 29.60, 36.32 (3C), 41.21 (3C), 47.58, 51.78, 104.35, 110.43, 111.70, 111.91, 118.10, 120.13, 126.67, 128.36, 135.60, 141.62, 141.74, 154.70, 161.58, 180.97. N-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2-(1-(2-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)-5-(furan-2-yl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (6). 2-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl-4-methylbenzenesulfonate (40 mg, 1.5 eq, 0.15 mmol) and KOH (25 mg, 5 eq, 0.5 mmol) were added at room temperature to a solution of compound 3 (46 mg, 1 eq, 0.1 mmol) in 3 mL DMF, and the reaction mixture was warmed to 90 °C for 6 h. To the cooled down solution, 15 mL saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution was added followed by 15 mL EA. The phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was separated 2 × 10 mL EA. The combined organic phases were washed with 20 mL brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by column chromatography (silica, EA:Hex, 1/1) to give 6 (44 mg, 72% yield) as yellow solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 1.68–1.79 (m, 6H), 2.08–2.19 (m, 9H), 3.51–3.71 (m, 6H), 3.65–3.70 (m, 2H), 3.90 (t, J = 5.43 Hz, 2H), 4.37 (t, J = 5.43 Hz, 2H), 4.40–4.45 (m, 1H), 4.49–4.68 (m, 1 H), 6.51 (dd, J = 3.28, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 3.28, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (s, 1H), 7.41–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.69 (dd, J = 8.59, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 8.69–8.88 (m, 1H), 9.08 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 29.38 (3C), 36.32 (3C), 41.20 (3C), 47.43, 51.76, 69.66 (2C), 70.43, 70.62, 70.81, 71.02 (2C), 83.95, 104.37, 110.64, 111.70, 117.98, 120.15, 126.69, 128.21, 135.84, 141.76, 142.29, 181.21. HRMS (ESI+): m/z (%) = 523.6150 (ccd. 523.6151) [M + H]+. N-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2-(5-(furan-2-yl)-1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (7). NaH (60% suspension in mineral oil, 10 mg, 2 eq, 0.25 mmol) was added to a solution of 4 (65 mg, 1 eq, 1.12 mmol) in 2 mL DMF at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min. MeI (64 µL, 8 eq, 1.02 mmol) was added, the ice bath was removed, and the reaction was magnetically stirred at room temperature. After 5 h, the reaction was quenched by slow addition of 2 mL cold water followed by 10 mL saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution and 15 mL EA. The phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was washed three times with 10 mL EA. The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting material was purified by column chromatography (silica, EA:Hex, 1/1) to give 7 (55 mg, 84% yield), yellow solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 1.75 (m., 6H), 2.10–2.20 (m, 9H), 3.25–3.39 (s, 3H), 3.77 (t, J = 5.43 Hz, 2H), 4.34 (t, J = 5.43 Hz, 2H), 6.46–6.55 (m, 1H), 6.68–6.78 (m, 1H), 7.39 (s, 1H), 7.40–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.69 (dd, J = 8.59, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 8.74 (d, J = 1.77 Hz, 1H), 9.01–9.10 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 30.00 (3C), 31.81, 36.43 (3C), 39.23 (3C), 47.15, 59.15, 70.73, 104.46, 110.37, 111.71, 120.26, 138.52, 141.71, 161.32, 181.22. HRMS (ESI+): m/z (%) = 447.5457 (ccd. 447.5455) [M + H]+. N-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2-(1-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)ethyl)-5-(furan-2-yl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamide (8). This compound was synthesized by employing the same procedure as for compound 7, and it was obtained in 75% yield as yellow solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 1.75 (m, 6H), 2.07–2.21 (m, 9H), 3.58–3.66 (m, 1H), 3.66–3.72 (m, 1H), 3.92 (t, J = 5.56 Hz, 2H), 4.38 (t, J = 5.43 Hz, 2H), 4.42–4.48 (m, 1H), 4.52–4.60 (m, 1H), 6.46–6.55 (m, 1H), 6.73 (dd, J = 3.28, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (s, 1H), 7.46 (dd, J = 8.59, 0.51 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (dd, J = 1.77, 0.76 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (dd, J = 8.59, 1.77 Hz, 1H), 8.75 (dd, J = 1.64, 0.63 Hz, 1H), 9.07 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 29.38 (3C), 36.32 (3C), 41.20 (3C), 47.44, 51.79, 69.88, 70.47, 70.67, 82.31, 83.99, 104.39, 110.59, 111.70, 112.25, 118.00, 120.23, 128.21, 135.82, 141.76, 142.14, 154.65, 161.45. HRMS (ESI+): m/z (%) = 479.5627 (ccd. 479.5625) [M + H]+.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the N-alkyl chain of the high affinity and selective CB2 ligand 5 was modified for the possibility of introducing a fluorine atom. The herein developed fluorinated compound 8 retained the high affinity of the lead compound, and will be considered for the development of an 18F-labeled radiotracer for CB2 receptors imaging with PET.
  39 in total

1.  Rapid combinatorial access to a library of 1,5-disubstituted-3-indole-N-alkylacetamides as CB2 receptor ligands.

Authors:  Serena Pasquini; Claudia Mugnaini; Antonella Brizzi; Alessia Ligresti; Vincenzo Di Marzo; Chiara Ghiron; Federico Corelli
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

2.  Modulation of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor in microglial cells in response to inflammatory stimuli.

Authors:  Katarzyna Maresz; Erica J Carrier; Eugene D Ponomarev; Cecilia J Hillard; Bonnie N Dittel
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 3.  Modulation of transmitter release via presynaptic cannabinoid receptors.

Authors:  E Schlicker; M Kathmann
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  Synthesis and evaluation of novel ¹⁸F labeled 2-pyridinylbenzoxazole and 2-pyridinylbenzothiazole derivatives as ligands for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of β-amyloid plaques.

Authors:  Mengchao Cui; Xuedan Wang; Pingrong Yu; Jinming Zhang; Zijing Li; Xiaojun Zhang; Yanping Yang; Masahiro Ono; Hongmei Jia; Hideo Saji; Boli Liu
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors and fatty acid amide hydrolase are specific markers of plaque cell subtypes in human multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Cristina Benito; Juan Pablo Romero; Rosa María Tolón; Diego Clemente; Fabián Docagne; Cecilia J Hillard; Camen Guaza; Julián Romero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A fluorogenic probe for the catalyst-free detection of azide-tagged molecules.

Authors:  Frédéric Friscourt; Christoph J Fahrni; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids.

Authors:  S Munro; K L Thomas; M Abu-Shaar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Cannabinoid signaling in glial cells.

Authors:  Nephi Stella
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 9.  The Endocannabinoid Signaling System in the CNS: A Primer.

Authors:  Cecilia J Hillard
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.230

10.  Aminoalkylindoles: structure-activity relationships of novel cannabinoid mimetics.

Authors:  M A Eissenstat; M R Bell; T E D'Ambra; E J Alexander; S J Daum; J H Ackerman; M D Gruett; V Kumar; K G Estep; E M Olefirowicz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of Highly Affine and Selective Fluorinated Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor Ligands.

Authors:  Rareş-Petru Moldovan; Kristin Hausmann; Winnie Deuther-Conrad; Peter Brust
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.345

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.