| Literature DB >> 28054978 |
Abstract
Intense efforts have been made by both industry and academia over the last three decades to produce viable hemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs), also known as "blood substitutes". Human trials conducted so far by several manufactures in a variety of clinical indications, including trauma, and elective surgeries have failed and no product has gained the Food and Drug Administration approval for human use. Safety concerns due to frequent incidences of hemodynamic, cardiac events, and even death led to the termination of some of these trials. Several second generation HBOC products that have been chemically and/or genetically modified (or in some cases ligated with carbon monoxide (CO)) found a new clinical application in conditions as complex as sickle cell disease (SCD). By virtue of higher oxygen affinity (P50) (R-state), and smaller size, HBOCs may be able to reach the microvasculature unload of oxygen to reverse the cycles of sickling/unsickling of the deoxy-sickle cell Hb (HbS) (T-state), thus preventing vaso-occlusion, a central event in SCD pathophysiology. However, biochemically, it is thought that outside the red blood cell (due to frequent hemolysis), free HbS or infused HBOCs are capable of interfering with a number of oxidative and signaling pathways and may, thus, negate any benefit that HBOCs may provide. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using HBOCs in SCD.Entities:
Keywords: blood substitutes; heme oxidation; hemoglobin; sickle cell disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28054978 PMCID: PMC5372714 DOI: 10.3390/biom7010002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers /HBOCs) associated adverse events 1.
| Transient hypertension |
| Gastrointestinal symptoms |
| Pancreatic and liver enzyme elevation |
| Myocardial infarction; cardiac arrhythmias |
| Renal Injury |
| Mortality |
1 Some of the most commonly reported adverse events in human trials with current generation HBOCs (for further details see recent summaries of the clinical data presented by manufactures on these HBOCs) [6,28].
Figure 1Proposed antisickling functions of hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) and possible complications of heme oxidative pathways. Red blood cell with predominately sickle cell hemoglobin (HbS) undergoes a vicious sickling and unsickling cycle in the microvasculature resulting in deoxyHbS fibers and free hemoglobin (Hb) spilling out of ruptured cells. Hb-laden microparticles release their contents (Hb and heme). Free Hb undergoes uncontrollable oxidation and oxidative changes through its classic pseudoperoxidase activity (redox cycling between ferric and ferryl heme) resulting ultimately in the loss of heme. Heme as damage associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecule triggers Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB), and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) activation. This leads to inflammatory responses and altered cell metabolism, including mitochondrial dysfunction. Haptoglobin (Hp) (protein scavenger) and hemopexin (Hxp) (heme scavenger) can effectively inhibit Hb oxidative side reactions and heme toxicity. HBOCs due to their relatively smaller sizes can reach microvasculature and by delivering oxygen (O2) and/or carbon monoxide (CO) may reverse sickling. However, HBOCs may aggravate oxidative stress by initiating its own damaging oxidative pathways. SS RBCs: sickle cell red blood cells.