Literature DB >> 28054311

Attention flexibly trades off across points in time.

Rachel N Denison1, David J Heeger2, Marisa Carrasco2.   

Abstract

Sensory signals continuously enter the brain, raising the question of how perceptual systems handle this constant flow of input. Attention to an anticipated point in time can prioritize visual information at that time. However, how we voluntarily attend across time when there are successive task-relevant stimuli has been barely investigated. We developed a novel experimental protocol that allowed us to assess, for the first time, both the benefits and costs of voluntary temporal attention when perceiving a short sequence of two or three visual targets with predictable timing. We found that when humans directed attention to a cued point in time, their ability to perceive orientation was better at that time but also worse earlier and later. These perceptual tradeoffs across time are analogous to those found across space for spatial attention. We concluded that voluntary attention is limited, and selective, across time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Selective attention; Temporal attention; Visual perception; Voluntary attention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28054311      PMCID: PMC5496802          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1216-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  38 in total

1.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Temporal constraints on conscious vision: on the ubiquitous nature of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark Nieuwenstein; Erik Van der Burg; Jan Theeuwes; Brad Wyble; Mary Potter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.

Authors:  J T Coull; A C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Orienting attention in time activates left intraparietal sulcus for both perceptual and motor task goals.

Authors:  Karen Davranche; Bruno Nazarian; Franck Vidal; Jennifer Coull
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Top-down control of the phase of alpha-band oscillations as a mechanism for temporal prediction.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Phoebe Bauer; Sawyer Cimaroli; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The attentional blink reveals the probabilistic nature of discrete conscious perception.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; Daryl Fougnie; Samir Zughni; Justin W Martin; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

10.  Independent effects of adaptation and attention on perceived speed.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Katrin Herrmann; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-14
View more
  11 in total

1.  How Does Expectation Shape Object-Based Attentional Selection?

Authors:  S J Katarina Slama; Randolph F Helfrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perceptual learning while preparing saccades.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Nicholas Murray-Smith; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.

Authors:  Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Temporal attention improves perception similarly at foveal and parafoveal locations.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Rachel N Denison; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.

Authors:  Ruud L van den Brink; Peter R Murphy; Kobe Desender; Nicole de Ru; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Directing Voluntary Temporal Attention Increases Fixational Stability.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Oculomotor freezing reflects tactile temporal expectation and aids tactile perception.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Caroline F Myers; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Effects of temporal and spatiotemporal cues on detection of dynamic road hazards.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Anna Kosovicheva; Simon Stent; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  Endogenous cueing effects for detection can be accounted for by a decision model of selective attention.

Authors:  Miranda L Johnson; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

10.  Rhythmic Temporal Expectation Boosts Neural Activity by Increasing Neural Gain.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Nicholas E Myers; Jan W Schnupp; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.