Literature DB >> 25381344

Cortical vs. afferent stimulation as an adjunct to functional task practice training: a randomized, comparative pilot study in people with cervical spinal cord injury.

Joyce Gomes-Osman1, Edelle C Field-Fote2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess single-session effects of three different types of stimuli known to increase cortical excitability when combined with functional task practice.
DESIGN: Randomized cross-over trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 24 participants with chronic cervical spinal cord injury.
INTERVENTIONS: One 30-minute session of each, applied concurrently with functional task practice: transcranial direct current stimulation, vibration, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. MEASUREMENTS: Nine-hole Peg Test, pinch force, visuomotor tracking, and cortical excitability were collected at pretest, posttest and late posttest (30 minutes after). Early effects (posttest minus pretest) and short-term persistence (late posttest minus pretest) were assessed using a general linear mixed model. Magnitude of effect size was assessed using the Cohen's d.
RESULTS: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was associated with moderate, significant early effects and short-term persistence on Nine-hole Peg Test performance (1.8 ±1.8, p = 0.003, d = 0.59; 2.0 ±2.5, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.65, respectively). Transcranial direct current stimulation (1.8 ±2.5, p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.52) was also associated with significant short-term persistence of moderate size on Nine-hole Peg Test performance (1.8 ±2.5, p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.52) and visuomotor tracking performance (p = 0.05, d = 0.51). Early effects on corticomotor excitability were significant for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (p = 0.003), approached significance for transcranial direct current stimulation (p = 0.07), and only vibration was associated with significant short-term persistence (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful improvements in aspects of hand-related function that persisted at least 30 minutes after intervention were observed with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, when combined with functional task practice.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spinal cord injury; functional task practice; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; vibration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381344     DOI: 10.1177/0269215514556087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  21 in total

1.  Electrophysiological Outcome Measures in Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Radha Korupolu; Argyrios Stampas; Mani Singh; Ping Zhou; Gerard Francisco
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with massed practice training to promote adaptive plasticity and motor recovery in chronic incomplete tetraplegia: A pilot study.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Daniel P Janini; Yin-Liang Lin; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Patrick Chabra; Kevin L Kilgore; Mary Ann Richmond; Frederick S Frost; Ela B Plow
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Fatma Inanici; Soshi Samejima; Parag Gad; V Reggie Edgerton; Christoph P Hofstetter; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Stepping responses to treadmill perturbations vary with severity of motor deficits in human SCI.

Authors:  Virginia W T Chu; T George Hornby; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long-term paired associative stimulation can restore voluntary control over paralyzed muscles in incomplete chronic spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Anastasia Shulga; Pantelis Lioumis; Aleksandra Zubareva; Nina Brandstack; Linda Kuusela; Erika Kirveskari; Sarianna Savolainen; Aarne Ylinen; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2016-07-14

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic training in incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcel Simis; Felipe Fregni; Linamara R Battistella
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-09-27

7.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutson; Simone Di Giovanni
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Corticospinal-motor neuronal plasticity promotes exercise-mediated recovery in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  Corticospinal Motor Circuit Plasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: Harnessing Neuroplasticity to Improve Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Syed Faraz Kazim; Christian A Bowers; Chad D Cole; Samantha Varela; Zafar Karimov; Erick Martinez; Jonathan V Ogulnick; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.