Literature DB >> 28052560

The microbiome as a source of new enterprises and job creation: Considering clinical faecal and synthetic microbiome transplants and therapeutic regulation.

Daniel van der Lelie1, Safiyh Taghavi1, Christopher Henry1,2,3, Jack A Gilbert1,4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28052560      PMCID: PMC5270749          DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Biotechnol        ISSN: 1751-7915            Impact factor:   5.813


× No keyword cloud information.
Modulation of the human immune system has become the focus for several novel approaches to treat conditions related to immune dysregulation, chronic infections and oncology. The human gut microbiome is being recognized as a key factor associated with the innate immune response, and exploring it has resulted in the identification of leads for therapeutics to treat conditions related to immune dysregulation and chronic infections, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, IBD, IBS, Crohn's disease, chronic intestinal infections and various forms of food allergies like allergies to peanuts, shellfish and dairy products. A number of companies are active in this area and developing therapeutic faecal microbiome transplants [FMT (Van Nood et al., 2013)] and defined microbial consortia to treat infections with Clostridium difficile, of which the products of Rebiotix and Seres Therapeutics are among the most advanced. Overall, synthetic microbiomes (designer formulations) for transplants are preferred over FMT to attain desired/demanded standardization and safety standards, mode of action understanding and acceptability by regulatory agencies (Bojanova and Bordenstein, 2016). However, recent clinical trials to treat chronic infections with C. difficile using FMT were successful (Van Nood et al., 2013), while a defined microbial consortium performed below expectation. Therefore, additional research is required to better understand the critical roles and interdependencies of keystone strains in the human gut microbiome to design successful therapeutics. The majority of designer formulations for modulating the immune response revolve around human‐derived butyrate‐producing bacterial species that belong to the Clostridia classes IV and XVIa to induce the accumulation of regulatory T cells that lead to the control of inflammation, a decrease in the secretion of a proinflammatory cytokine, or an enhanced secretion of an anti‐inflammatory cytokine by a population of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The best‐documented example of this approach is the work by Kenya Honda around a 17 species Clostridium strain consortium (Atarashi et al., 2011, 2013), VE202, which is currently being developed by companies like Vedanta Biosciences and Johnson & Johnson. Thus far, such probiotic formulations have proven useful in the treatment of immune disorders in only a subset of patients, further supporting the case for the need to better understand the interdependencies and interactions among keystone strains to improve engrafting and performance of probiotic formulations based on synthetic microbiomes. The complexity of the human gut microbiome has limited the development of microbiome‐based therapeutics. This has prompted several efforts to develop predictive models to study the critical interdependencies of microbiome keystone species and the impact of host–microbiome interactions in specific diseases. Recent examples of such modelling systems include CASINO – Community and Systems‐level Interactive Optimization (Shoaie et al., 2015) – and AGORA – Assembly of Gut Organisms through Reconstruction and Analysis (Magnúsdóttir et al., 2016). It is expected that in the near future, predictive modelling will change the way microbiome research and development is being carried out, not just for microbial therapeutics, but also in adjacent areas, such as immunotherapy drugs for cancer treatment. Examples of processes, which are constrained by costs and time for experimental validation and will benefit from predictive modelling, include mode of action understanding, finding new indications, add‐on/adjunct therapies, root cause analysis, understanding of adverse events, optimized engraftment, effects of diet, secondary prevention (comorbidity), identification of predictive biomarkers, optimized trial design, detailed cohort studies and sample size extrapolation. An example of a start‐up company that is at the forefront of using predictive modelling for every aspect of their R&D platform is Gusto Global: their modelling platform enables a significant (100‐fold or more) in silico reduction of experimental permutations for hypothesis‐driven experimental confirmation, mode of action understanding and product optimization. This provides a substantial opportunity for rapid optimization of existing microbial therapeutics through in silico modelling, as well novel therapeutic prediction. This is a rapidly developing area that requires a substantial focus on efficacy and reproducibility that will enable clinical application at scale.
  6 in total

1.  Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Stefanía Magnúsdóttir; Almut Heinken; Laura Kutt; Dmitry A Ravcheev; Eugen Bauer; Alberto Noronha; Kacy Greenhalgh; Christian Jäger; Joanna Baginska; Paul Wilmes; Ronan M T Fleming; Ines Thiele
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species.

Authors:  Koji Atarashi; Takeshi Tanoue; Tatsuichiro Shima; Akemi Imaoka; Tomomi Kuwahara; Yoshika Momose; Genhong Cheng; Sho Yamasaki; Takashi Saito; Yusuke Ohba; Tadatsugu Taniguchi; Kiyoshi Takeda; Shohei Hori; Ivaylo I Ivanov; Yoshinori Umesaki; Kikuji Itoh; Kenya Honda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Els van Nood; Anne Vrieze; Max Nieuwdorp; Susana Fuentes; Erwin G Zoetendal; Willem M de Vos; Caroline E Visser; Ed J Kuijper; Joep F W M Bartelsman; Jan G P Tijssen; Peter Speelman; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Josbert J Keller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Quantifying Diet-Induced Metabolic Changes of the Human Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Saeed Shoaie; Pouyan Ghaffari; Petia Kovatcheva-Datchary; Adil Mardinoglu; Partho Sen; Estelle Pujos-Guillot; Tomas de Wouters; Catherine Juste; Salwa Rizkalla; Julien Chilloux; Lesley Hoyles; Jeremy K Nicholson; Joel Dore; Marc E Dumas; Karine Clement; Fredrik Bäckhed; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 27.287

5.  Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota.

Authors:  Koji Atarashi; Takeshi Tanoue; Kenshiro Oshima; Wataru Suda; Yuji Nagano; Hiroyoshi Nishikawa; Shinji Fukuda; Takuro Saito; Seiko Narushima; Koji Hase; Sangwan Kim; Joëlle V Fritz; Paul Wilmes; Satoshi Ueha; Kouji Matsushima; Hiroshi Ohno; Bernat Olle; Shimon Sakaguchi; Tadatsugu Taniguchi; Hidetoshi Morita; Masahira Hattori; Kenya Honda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Fecal Transplants: What Is Being Transferred?

Authors:  Diana P Bojanova; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Trends in "Smart Probiotics": Functional Consideration for the Development of Novel Health and Industrial Applications.

Authors:  Racha El Hage; Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Tom Van de Wiele
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Marine microbiome as source of natural products.

Authors:  Fernando de la Calle
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  The contribution of microbial biotechnology to economic growth and employment creation.

Authors:  Kenneth Timmis; Victor de Lorenzo; Willy Verstraete; Juan Luis Ramos; Antoine Danchin; Harald Brüssow; Brajesh K Singh; James Kenneth Timmis
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Electrospun Solid Formulation of Anaerobic Gut Microbiome Bacteria.

Authors:  Panna Vass; Eszter Pantea; András Domokos; Edit Hirsch; Júlia Domján; Áron Németh; Mónika Molnár; Csaba Fehér; Sune K Andersen; Tamás Vigh; Geert Verreck; István Csontos; György Marosi; Zsombor K Nagy
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.