| Literature DB >> 28051046 |
Mukaila Oyegbade Akinwale1, Arinola A Sanusi1, Oluwaseun K Adebayo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Typhoid perforation ileitis is a serious complication of typhoid fever, a common and unfortunate health problem in a resource-poor country like Nigeria. Following bowel perforation, treatment is usually by simple closure or bowel resection and anastomosis after adequate aggressive fluid resuscitation and electrolyte correction. Postoperatively, some of these patients do require management in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) on account of sepsis or septic shock and to improve survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study in which 67 consecutive patients who had exploratory laparotomy for typhoid perforation between August 2009 and October 2012 in the main operating theatre of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, were studied. The attending anaesthetists had the freedom of choosing the appropriate anaesthetic drugs depending on the patients' clinical condition. The reason for admission into the ICU, the types of organ support required and outcomes were recorded.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28051046 PMCID: PMC5154222 DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.194664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Paediatr Surg ISSN: 0974-5998
Figure 1Age group distribution by sex
Age and sex distribution
| Age group (year) | Male | Female | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | 2 | 1 | 3 (4.5) |
| 6-10 | 14 | 9 | 23 (34.3) |
| 11-15 | 12 | 4 | 16 (23.9) |
| 16-20 | 7 | 3 | 10 (14.9) |
| 20-25 | - | - | - |
| >30 | 6 | 5 | 11 (16.4) |
| Total | 42 (62.7) | 25 (37.3) | 67 (100) |
Preoperative and intraoperative clinical characteristics
| Variable | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| ASA risk classification | ||
| I | - | - |
| II | 17 | 25.4 |
| III | 42 | 62.7 |
| IV | 8 | 11.9 |
| Median EBL (range) ml | 135 (10-1600) | |
| Median blood transfused (range), ml | 475. 2 (100-1000) | |
EBL: Estimated blood loss
Postoperative ICU care
| Variable | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Admission into ICU | ||
| Yes | 25 | 37.3 |
| No | 42 | 62.7 |
| Mechanical ventilation | ||
| Yes | 21 | 84.0 |
| No | 4 | 16.0 |
| Inotropic support in ICU | ||
| Yes | 14 | 56.0 |
| No | 11 | 44.0 |
| Types of Inotrope used | ||
| Dopamine only | 6 | 42.9 |
| Adrenaline only | 3 | 21.4 |
| Dopamine + adrenaline | 5 | 35.7 |
| Patients outcome | ||
| Survived | 19 | 76.0 |
| Dead | 6 | 24.0 |
| Mean duration of mechanical ventilation (range), days | 2.14 (1-5) | |
| Mean length of ICU stay (range, SD) days | 4.32 (1-15) | |
Survival and ICU intervention
| Survived (%) | Died (%) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical ventilation | ||||
| Yes 21 | 15 (71.4) | 6 (28.6) | 21 (100) | 0.220 |
| No 4 | 4 | 0 | ||
| Inotropic support | ||||
| Yes 14 | 8 (57.1) | 6 (42.9) | 14 (100) | 0.013 |
| No 11 | 11 (100) | 0 |