Literature DB >> 15542956

Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review.

Richard J Beale1, Steven M Hollenberg, Jean-Louis Vincent, Joseph E Parrillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and to improve outcome in severe sepsis.
DESIGN: The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.
METHODS: The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591.
CONCLUSION: An arterial catheter should be placed as soon as possible in patients with septic shock. Vasopressors are indicated to maintain mean arterial pressure of <65 mm Hg, both during and following adequate fluid resuscitation. Norepinephrine or dopamine are the vasopressors of choice in the treatment of septic shock. Norepinephrine may be combined with dobutamine when cardiac output is being measured. Epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin are not recommended as first-line agents in the treatment of septic shock. Vasopressin may be considered for salvage therapy. Low-dose dopamine is not recommended for the purpose of renal protection. Dobutamine is recommended as the agent of choice to increase cardiac output but should not be used for the purpose of increasing cardiac output above physiologic levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15542956     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000142909.86238.b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  35 in total

1.  The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Francisco Javier Belda; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Mikhail Kirov; Julia Wendon; Roger Lussmann; Marco Maggiorini
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Current treatment of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Ismail Cinel; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  [Volume replacement in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  B Nohé; A Ploppa; V Schmidt; K Unertl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; Jukka Takala; Hanno Ulmer; Viktoria D Mayr; Günter Luckner; Stefan Jochberger; Fritz Daudel; Philipp Lepper; Walter R Hasibeder; Stephan M Jakob
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Comparison of phenylephrine and norepinephrine in the management of dopamine-resistant septic shock.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; D K Singh
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01

7.  Clinical impact of vasopressin infusion on hemodynamics, liver and renal function in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Nameet Jerath; Helena Frndova; Brian W McCrindle; Rebecca Gurofsky; Tilman Humpl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Influence of acute epinephrine infusion on endotoxin-induced parameters of heart rate variability: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Badar U Jan; Susette M Coyle; Leo O Oikawa; Shou-En Lu; Steve E Calvano; Paul M Lehrer; Stephen F Lowry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for initial hemodynamic support of patients with septic shock: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Matthias Lange; Alessandra Orecchioni; Amalia Laderchi; Alessandra Bachetoni; Mariadomenica D'Alessandro; Hugo Van Aken; Paolo Pietropaoli; Martin Westphal
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Association of arterial blood pressure and vasopressor load with septic shock mortality: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; Esko Ruokonen; Ville Pettilä; Hanno Ulmer; Christian Torgersen; Christian A Schmittinger; Stephan Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.