OBJECTIVE: In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and to improve outcome in severe sepsis. DESIGN: The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. METHODS: The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591. CONCLUSION: An arterial catheter should be placed as soon as possible in patients with septic shock. Vasopressors are indicated to maintain mean arterial pressure of <65 mm Hg, both during and following adequate fluid resuscitation. Norepinephrine or dopamine are the vasopressors of choice in the treatment of septic shock. Norepinephrine may be combined with dobutamine when cardiac output is being measured. Epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin are not recommended as first-line agents in the treatment of septic shock. Vasopressin may be considered for salvage therapy. Low-dose dopamine is not recommended for the purpose of renal protection. Dobutamine is recommended as the agent of choice to increase cardiac output but should not be used for the purpose of increasing cardiac output above physiologic levels.
OBJECTIVE: In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and to improve outcome in severe sepsis. DESIGN: The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. METHODS: The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591. CONCLUSION: An arterial catheter should be placed as soon as possible in patients with septic shock. Vasopressors are indicated to maintain mean arterial pressure of <65 mm Hg, both during and following adequate fluid resuscitation. Norepinephrine or dopamine are the vasopressors of choice in the treatment of septic shock. Norepinephrine may be combined with dobutamine when cardiac output is being measured. Epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin are not recommended as first-line agents in the treatment of septic shock. Vasopressin may be considered for salvage therapy. Low-dose dopamine is not recommended for the purpose of renal protection. Dobutamine is recommended as the agent of choice to increase cardiac output but should not be used for the purpose of increasing cardiac output above physiologic levels.
Authors: Azriel Perel; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Francisco Javier Belda; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Mikhail Kirov; Julia Wendon; Roger Lussmann; Marco Maggiorini Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Martin W Dünser; Jukka Takala; Hanno Ulmer; Viktoria D Mayr; Günter Luckner; Stefan Jochberger; Fritz Daudel; Philipp Lepper; Walter R Hasibeder; Stephan M Jakob Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nameet Jerath; Helena Frndova; Brian W McCrindle; Rebecca Gurofsky; Tilman Humpl Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Badar U Jan; Susette M Coyle; Leo O Oikawa; Shou-En Lu; Steve E Calvano; Paul M Lehrer; Stephen F Lowry Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrea Morelli; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Matthias Lange; Alessandra Orecchioni; Amalia Laderchi; Alessandra Bachetoni; Mariadomenica D'Alessandro; Hugo Van Aken; Paolo Pietropaoli; Martin Westphal Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Martin W Dünser; Esko Ruokonen; Ville Pettilä; Hanno Ulmer; Christian Torgersen; Christian A Schmittinger; Stephan Jakob; Jukka Takala Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 9.097