Edson Borges1,2, Amanda Souza Setti1,2, Daniela P A F Braga1,2,3, Murilo V Geraldo4, Rita de Cássia S Figueira1, Assumpto Iaconelli1,2. 1. Fertility Medical Group - São Paulo/SP - Brazil. 2. Instituto Sapientiae - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução Assistida - São Paulo/SP - Brazil. 3. Disciplina de Urologia, Área de Reprodução Humana, Departamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo/SP - Brazil. 4. Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas UNICAMP/SP - Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to find whether microRNAs (miRNAs) detected in the culture medium of embryos produced in vitro could be potential biomarkers of embryo implantation. METHODS: Culture media samples from 36 embryos, derived from patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in a private university-affiliated IVF center, were collected between January/2015 and November/2015. Samples were collected on day three and embryo transfers were performed on day five and all embryos reached the blastocyst stage. Samples were split into groups according to the embryo implantation result: Positive-Implantation-Group (n=18) or Negative-Implantation-Group (n=18). For the first analysis, samples were pooled in three sets for each group (6-7 spent media per pool). MicroRNAs were extracted from spent media and cDNA was synthesized. C. elegans miR-39 was used as RNA spike-in to normalize the gene expression analysis. The expression of microRNAs into the spent media from the Positive-Implantation-Group was compared with those from the Negative-Implantation-Group. A set of seven miRNAs (miR-21, miR-142-3p, miR-19b, miR-92a, miR-20b, miR-125a and miR148a) selected according with the literature, was tested. To check whether miRNAs could be detected in individual samples of culture media, in a second analysis, ten more samples were tested for miR-21 and miR-142-3p. RESULTS: From the sevens tested miRNAs, a significant increased expression of miR-142-3p could be noted in the Negative-Implantation-Group (P<0.001). For other three miRNAs (miR-21, miR-19b and miR-92a) a difference in expression was observed, however it did not reach a statistical significance. In addition, when ten non-redundant samples were tested to check if miRNAs could be detected in individual samples of culture media, the highly specific amplification of mature miRNAs, including miR-142-3p, could be noted. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that miR-142-3p, previously described as a tumor suppressor and cell cycle inhibitor, may be a potential biomarker of blastocyst implantation failure. The identification of miRNAs on individual culture medium samples offers unique opportunities for non-invasive early diagnosis of blastocyst implantation.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to find whether microRNAs (miRNAs) detected in the culture medium of embryos produced in vitro could be potential biomarkers of embryo implantation. METHODS: Culture media samples from 36 embryos, derived from patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in a private university-affiliated IVF center, were collected between January/2015 and November/2015. Samples were collected on day three and embryo transfers were performed on day five and all embryos reached the blastocyst stage. Samples were split into groups according to the embryo implantation result: Positive-Implantation-Group (n=18) or Negative-Implantation-Group (n=18). For the first analysis, samples were pooled in three sets for each group (6-7 spent media per pool). MicroRNAs were extracted from spent media and cDNA was synthesized. C. elegansmiR-39 was used as RNA spike-in to normalize the gene expression analysis. The expression of microRNAs into the spent media from the Positive-Implantation-Group was compared with those from the Negative-Implantation-Group. A set of seven miRNAs (miR-21, miR-142-3p, miR-19b, miR-92a, miR-20b, miR-125a and miR148a) selected according with the literature, was tested. To check whether miRNAs could be detected in individual samples of culture media, in a second analysis, ten more samples were tested for miR-21 and miR-142-3p. RESULTS: From the sevens tested miRNAs, a significant increased expression of miR-142-3p could be noted in the Negative-Implantation-Group (P<0.001). For other three miRNAs (miR-21, miR-19b and miR-92a) a difference in expression was observed, however it did not reach a statistical significance. In addition, when ten non-redundant samples were tested to check if miRNAs could be detected in individual samples of culture media, the highly specific amplification of mature miRNAs, including miR-142-3p, could be noted. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that miR-142-3p, previously described as a tumor suppressor and cell cycle inhibitor, may be a potential biomarker of blastocyst implantation failure. The identification of miRNAs on individual culture medium samples offers unique opportunities for non-invasive early diagnosis of blastocyst implantation.
The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has dramatically increased in the
past decades. Despite the technical progress achieved in embryo culture and areas
such as culture medium and incubators, most transferred embryos fail to implant
(de Mouzon ). Multiple-embryo transfers are commonly performed to compensate for the
relatively low efficiency of the procedure. However, this practice often results in
multiple pregnancies (Pandian ; Setti & Bulletti,
2011), an undesired outcome that occurs thirty times more frequently in
women undergoing ART than in women with spontaneous pregnancies (ACOG, 2005). Single-embryo transfer (SET) may
reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies. The success of SET relies on the optimal
selection of a single embryo for transfer, based on morphologic criteria.Optimal embryo selection for transfer is challenging. The ability of the several
scoring systems available today to assess embryo potential seems to have reached a
plateau. Thus, it is of interest to discover a biomarker of embryo viability and
implantation potential that leads to higher pregnancy rates while reducing the
number of multiple pregnancies via SET (Rosenbluth
). An ideal biomarker should allow
non-invasive embryo assessment based on the analysis of the surrounding culture
medium. Many potential embryo biomarkers have been recently investigated. Secreted
proteins and metabolites were identified in embryo culture medium (Cortezzi ; Hardarson ; Vergouw ; Cortezzi );
however, this technology has not led to an improved ability to predict embryo
implantation potential.More recently, the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in embryo development and implantation
has been investigated (Suh & Blelloch,
2011). MiRNAs are endogenous, evolutionally conserved, single-strand
non-coding RNA molecules of 20-24 nucleotides, that post-transcriptionally regulate
gene expression in eukaryotes, including mammalian cells (Asirvatham ; McCallie ; Mouillet ; Thouas ). They were first described
in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (Lee
; Wightman ) and later found in the genomes of
protists, plants, animals, and viruses (Mouillet
). In humans, miRNAs have been detected
in virtually all bodily fluids, including blood, urine, saliva, tears, breast milk,
semen, amniotic fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, peritoneal fluid, and pleural fluid as
well as in culture medium collected from different cell lines (Wang ; Wang ; Weber ).Currently, more than 2,500 human miRNAs are listed in the biological database miRBase
(http://mirbase.org). They are believed to be involved in virtually
every biological process, modulating regulatory pathways that control early embryo
development (Laurent, 2008), cell growth
(Carleton ),
development (Tang ) and differentiation (Lakshmipathy
) and organ function in health and
disease, including several types of cancers (Barbarotto ), viral infections (Sullivan & Ganem, 2005), and heart disease
(Tatsuguchi ).MiRNAs have been shown to play an important role during mouse embryonic development,
with an overall surge toward the blastocyst stage (Yang ). More than 130 miRNAs are expressed
in the humanblastocyst (McCallie ; Rosenbluth
). McCallie first described that blastocyst
derived from infertilepatients have atypical miRNA profiles. Later, it was
demonstrated that miRNA expression in blastocysts differs between euploid and
aneuploid embryos, as well as between genders (Rosenbluth ). Specific miRNAs are also
detectable in spent blastocyst culture medium, with correlations to oocyte
insemination method, embryo ploidy, and live birth (Rosenbluth ). Recently, Capalbo have
comprehensively characterized the population of miRNAs secreted from humanblastocysts into spent culture medium, and two miRNAs (miR-20a, miR-30c) were
positively correlated with blastocyst implantation.Still, very few studies have investigated the correlation between miRNA expression
and embryo implantation potential. The objective of this study was to identify
miRNAs secreted by embryos in culture medium that could be potential biomarkers of
blastocyst implantation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study Design
This pilot study included spent culture medium from 36 embryos, derived from
patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in a private
university-affiliated IVF center, collected between January/2015 and
November/2015. The samples were collected on day three and the embryo transfer
procedures were performed on day five; all embryos reached the blastocyst stage.
The samples were split into groups with positive (n=18) or negative (n=18)
implantation outcomes. In the first analysis, the samples were pooled in three
sets for each group. The positive and negative implantation groups were compared
for microRNA expression in the spent medium. A set of seven miRNAs, selected
according to the literature, was tested. Ten additional samples were tested for
miRNAs in individual samples of culture medium in a second analysis cycle.The patients consented in written to having their cycle outcomes analyzed in this
study. The local institutional review board approved the study.
Controlled ovarian stimulation
Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) was achieved by pituitary blockage using a
GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide; Serono, Geneva, Switzerland); and ovarian
stimulation was performed using recombinant FSH (Gonal-F; Serono, Geneva,
Switzerland).Follicular growth was monitored using transvaginal ultrasound examination
starting on day four of gonadotropin administration. When adequate follicular
growth and serum estradiol levels were observed, recombinant hCG (Ovidrel;
Serono, Geneva, Switzerland) was administered to trigger final follicular
maturation. The oocytes were collected 35 hours after hCG administration through
transvaginal ultrasound-guided ovum pickup.
Oocyte preparation
The retrieved oocytes were maintained in culture medium (Global® for
fertilization, LifeGlobal, Connecticut, USA) with 10% protein supplement (LGPS,
LifeGlobal) and covered with paraffin oil (Paraffin oil P.G., LifeGlobal) for
two to three hours before the removal of cumulus cells. The surrounding cumulus
cells were removed after exposure to a HEPES-buffered medium containing
hyaluronidase (80 IU/mL, LifeGlobal). The remaining cumulus cells were
mechanically removed gently by pipetting with a hand-drawn Pasteur pipette
(Humagen Fertility Diagnostics, Charlottesville, USA).Oocyte morphology was assessed using an inverted Nikon Diaphot microscope
(Eclipse TE 300; Nikon®, Tokyo, Japan) with a Hoffmann modulation
contrast system under 400X magnification just before sperm injection (4 hours
after retrieval). The oocytes observed to have released the first polar body
were considered mature and were used for ICSI.
IVF procedures and spent medium collection
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed in a micro-injection dish prepared
with 4 µL droplets of buffered medium (Global® w/HEPES,
LifeGlobal) and covered with paraffin oil on the heated stage of an inverted
microscope at 37.0 ± 0.5°C. Approximately 16 hours after ICSI,
fertilization was confirmed by the presence of two pronuclei and the extrusion
of the second polar body. The embryos were maintained in a 50 µL drop of
culture medium (Global®, LifeGlobal) with 10% protein supplement and
covered with paraffin oil in a humidified atmosphere under 6% CO2 at 37ºC for
three days. The embryos were moved to fresh medium droplets and were cultured
until day-5 of development; 20µL of the spent medium were collected and
stored at -80º C for miRNA analysis. One or two embryos were transferred on day
five.
miRNA Isolation and Detection
To maximize the total amount of RNA available from each spent medium sample
collected, cDNA was synthesized using the Taqman MicroRNA Reverse Transcription
Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer
instructions. C. elegansmiR-39 was used as an RNA spike-in to normalize gene
expression analysis. The detection of miRNAs was performed using Taqman miRNA
Assays (Life Technologies). The analysis of the expression obtained in real-time
quantitative PCR was performed using the SDS software (Life Technologies).In a further step, cDNA was individually synthesized for each tested miRNA using
the miRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Life Technologies), according to
manufacturer instructions. The detection of miRNA expression was performed by
quantitative real-time PCR, using the TaqMan® MiRNA Assay system
(Life Technologies).
Statistical analyses
Comparisons between experimental groups were performed using the
ΔΔCt method. The statistical significance of fold changes was
determined by performing an unpaired, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test of the
ΔΔCt values.
RESULTS
Expression of four of the seven tested miRNAs was detected in spent medium from
pooled samples. Three miRNAs were differently expressed between the groups. A
significant increased expression of miR-142-3p was seen in the negative implantation
group (P<0.001) (Fig 1). A
non-statistical difference was observed in the expression of two other miRNAs
(miR-21 and miR-92a) (Fig 2). A highly specific
amplification of mature miRNAs, including miR-142-3-, was observed when
ten non-redundant samples were tested for miRNA in individual samples of culture
medium (data not shown).
Figure 1
Expression of miR-142-3p in the Positive and Negative Implantation
groups.
Figure 2
Expression of miR-21 and miR-92a in the Positive and Negative
Implantation groups
Expression of miR-142-3p in the Positive and Negative Implantation
groups.Expression of miR-21 and miR-92a in the Positive and Negative
Implantation groups
DISCUSSION
The importance of miRNAs in embryonic stem cell lines and embryo development in
several species has been proven. Several studies have described dynamic changes in
miRNA expression in gametes and during early embryo development of mammalian species
(Tang ;
Tesfaye ;
Hossain ;
Mondou ;
Abd El Naby ). However, little is known about human embryo miRNA expression. The
results from this pilot study demonstrate that increased expression of miR-142-3p
might be associated with implantation failure in ICSI cycles.Bioinformatic analysis of miR-142-3p predicted targets showed its potential role on
the regulation of several biological pathways and cell functions, including cell
cycle inhibition and tumor suppression (Lee
). However, the biological role of
miR-142-3p during early human embryo development is yet to be determined.Hergenreider
showed that cultured cells secrete miRNA into the surrounding medium. In this
context, embryos developing in vitro offer a promising possibility of detecting
miRNA expression in spent culture medium and identifying noninvasive biomarkers of
embryo viability and implantation potential.The main characteristics of an ideal embryonic biomarker are: (1) noninvasive
assessment, (ii) stability over time, (iii) embryo specificity, and (iv) easy
measurement to allow fast assessment of embryo competence. MiRNAs seem to fit it
perfectly (Capalbo ). In fact, the stability of miRNAs and resistance to degradation is
well known (Chen ; Mraz ). Since miRNAs may be encapsulated in exosomes, which are small
vesicles that offer additional protection from degrading enzymes (Boon & Vickers, 2013) or conjugated with
macromolecular complexes (Weber ), they are protected from degradation and can be
detected after extended periods of time (Jung
).Rosenbluth were
the first to attempt to describe miRNA secreted from embryos in culture medium. The
authors observed that the most highly expressed miRNA in euploid embryos was
miR-372. Several differentially expressed miRNAs were discovered based on
chromosomal status, including gender of the embryo.Another study by Rosenbluth detected ten miRNAs, but eight yielded false-positive signals
derived from the protein supplement used in the culture medium, since miRNAs were
also present in the 'blank' culture medium prior to embryo culture. The authors also
looked into whether MiRNAs were differentially secreted according to embryo
chromosomal status and pregnancy outcome. Higher expression levels of two miRNAs,
which were not present in the blank culture medium, were associated with embryo
aneuploidy (miR-191) and pregnancy failure (miR-191 and miR-372). The association
between both miRNAs and pregnancy failure was found only in embryos derived from
conventional IVF cycles, suggesting that sperm injection alters miRNA secretion
patterns.More recently, Capalbo comprehensively characterized the profile of miRNAs secreted by
human embryos in spent culture medium and explored whether miRNAs could be used as
biomarkers of ICSI outcomes. The study revealed that two miRNAs (miR-20a and
miR-30c) had higher concentration levels in the spent medium of implanted
blastocysts. Both miRNAs are suggested to be involved in 23 pathways related to
embryo implantation.Several different miRNAs have been involved in the assessment of embryo competence.
However, there is no consensus in the literature over this issue. The
inconsistencies may be explained by the different methods used in miRNA analysis and
the differences in the day of collection of spent medium; in our study spent medium
was collected on day 3 from embryos achieving the blastocyst stage on day 5, while
others collected spent medium on day 5. Moreover, during embryo development, there
is constant synthesis and degradation of miRNAs. It has been shown that miRNAs are
maternally inherited with the loss of approximately 60% between the one- and
two-cell stages during the maternal zygotic transition (Tang ), with an overall increase
in miRNAs expression by the blastocyst stage (Yang
).miRNAs have been suggested as suitable candidates for biomarkers of embryo competence
for their association with several diseases (Bernstein ; Tzur ; Foshay & Gallicano, 2009; Medeiros
; Wang
). Recent studies indicated a biological
role for miRNA in controlling ovarian function (Imbar and Eisenberg, 2014), in which there is intense exchange of miRNAs
between the oocyte and granulosa cells (Fiedler
). Some studies have also described
altered miRNA expression in patients with ovarian dysfunctions, such as polycystic
ovarian syndrome (Sang ; Roth ) and premature ovarian failure (Yang
). Moreover, poor response to controlled
ovarian stimulation has also been related to altered miRNA expression (Karakaya ).In animal models, new communication systems mediating the crosstalk between the
preimplantation embryo and the endometrium based on miRNA expression have been
recently discovered (Sengupta ; Pawar ; Rosario
; Chu
). Specific miRNAs may act by
transferring information from the blastocyst to the surrounding endometrial cells,
thus altering the outcome of implantation.This study has been affected by the following limitations: (i) a small case basis,
and (ii) a limited number of analyzed miRNAs. Despite the relatively small number of
embryos included in our analysis, we were able to detect significant differences in
miRNA expression between the groups. We confirmed that miR-142-3p is
differentially expressed in human embryos that achieve the blastocyst stage
according to their implantation status. This study provided additional evidence that
miRNAs are secreted from human embryos into the culture medium, which makes miRNA a
good candidate biomarker for embryo competence and implantation development. Future
studies are required to determine whether embryo culture medium might be enriched or
deprived of specific miRNAs and improve embryo development.In conclusion, our preliminary results support the need to further explore miRNA
expression in spent culture medium as a noninvasive biomarker of embryo quality and
implantation potential in ICSI cycles.
Authors: Fuchou Tang; Masahiro Kaneda; Dónal O'Carroll; Petra Hajkova; Sheila C Barton; Y Andrew Sun; Caroline Lee; Alexander Tarakhovsky; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Sylvia S Cortezzi; Jerusa S Garcia; Christina R Ferreira; Daniela P A F Braga; Rita C S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Gustavo H M F Souza; Edson Borges; Marcos N Eberlin Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Evan M Rosenbluth; Dawne N Shelton; Lindsay M Wells; Amy E T Sparks; Bradley J Van Voorhis Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Mariko Tatsuguchi; Hee Young Seok; Thomas E Callis; J Michael Thomson; Jian-Fu Chen; Martin Newman; Mauricio Rojas; Scott M Hammond; Da-Zhi Wang Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2007-04-14 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Emily Bernstein; Sang Yong Kim; Michelle A Carmell; Elizabeth P Murchison; Heather Alcorn; Mamie Z Li; Alea A Mills; Stephen J Elledge; Kathryn V Anderson; Gregory J Hannon Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2003-10-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Brandi L Carofino; Kayla M Dinshaw; Pui Yan Ho; Christophe Cataisson; Aleksandra M Michalowski; Andrew Ryscavage; Addie Alkhas; Nathan W Wong; Vishal Koparde; Stuart H Yuspa Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2019-12-31