Literature DB >> 28050713

Metabolic Profiling of Human Long-Term Liver Models and Hepatic Clearance Predictions from In Vitro Data Using Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling.

Nicole A Kratochwil1, Christophe Meille2, Stephen Fowler2, Florian Klammers2, Aynur Ekiciler2, Birgit Molitor2, Sandrine Simon2, Isabelle Walter2, Claudia McGinnis2, Johanna Walther2, Brian Leonard2, Miriam Triyatni2, Hassan Javanbakht2, Christoph Funk2, Franz Schuler2, Thierry Lavé2, Neil J Parrott2.   

Abstract

Early prediction of human clearance is often challenging, in particular for the growing number of low-clearance compounds. Long-term in vitro models have been developed which enable sophisticated hepatic drug disposition studies and improved clearance predictions. Here, the cell line HepG2, iPSC-derived hepatocytes (iCell®), the hepatic stem cell line HepaRG™, and human hepatocyte co-cultures (HμREL™ and HepatoPac®) were compared to primary hepatocyte suspension cultures with respect to their key metabolic activities. Similar metabolic activities were found for the long-term models HepaRG™, HμREL™, and HepatoPac® and the short-term suspension cultures when averaged across all 11 enzyme markers, although differences were seen in the activities of CYP2D6 and non-CYP enzymes. For iCell® and HepG2, the metabolic activity was more than tenfold lower. The micropatterned HepatoPac® model was further evaluated with respect to clearance prediction. To assess the in vitro parameters, pharmacokinetic modeling was applied. The determination of intrinsic clearance by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in a long-term model significantly increased the confidence in the parameter estimation and extended the sensitive range towards 3% of liver blood flow, i.e., >10-fold lower as compared to suspension cultures. For in vitro to in vivo extrapolation, the well-stirred model was used. The micropatterned model gave rise to clearance prediction in man within a twofold error for the majority of low-clearance compounds. Further research is needed to understand whether transporter activity and drug metabolism by non-CYP enzymes, such as UGTs, SULTs, AO, and FMO, is comparable to the in vivo situation in these long-term culture models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVIVE; in vitro clearance; in vitro liver models; nonlinear mixed-effects modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28050713     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-0019-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  49 in total

1.  Practical use of the regression offset approach for the prediction of in vivo intrinsic clearance from hepatocytes.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Sohlenius-Sternbeck; Christopher Jones; Douglas Ferguson; Brian J Middleton; Denis Projean; Eva Floby; Johan Bylund; Lovisa Afzelius
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.908

2.  Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.

Authors:  Ugo Zanelli; Nicola Pasquale Caradonna; David Hallifax; Elisa Turlizzi; J Brian Houston
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 3.  The role of drug metabolizing enzymes in clearance.

Authors:  Li Di
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Meeting the challenge of predicting hepatic clearance of compounds slowly metabolized by cytochrome P450 using a novel hepatocyte model, HepatoPac.

Authors:  Tom S Chan; Hongbin Yu; Amanda Moore; Salman R Khetani; Salman R Kehtani; Donald Tweedie
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  Comparative assessment of In Vitro-In Vivo extrapolation methods used for predicting hepatic metabolic clearance of drugs.

Authors:  Patrick Poulin; Cornelis E C A Hop; Quynh Ho; Jason S Halladay; Sami Haddad; Jane R Kenny
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  The Role of Extracellular Binding Proteins in the Cellular Uptake of Drugs: Impact on Quantitative In Vitro-to-In Vivo Extrapolations of Toxicity and Efficacy in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Research.

Authors:  Patrick Poulin; Frank J Burczynski; Sami Haddad
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 7.  Addressing the challenges of low clearance in drug research.

Authors:  Li Di; R Scott Obach
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Predicting clearance in humans from in vitro data.

Authors:  R Scott Obach
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The population approach to pharmacokinetic data analysis: rationale and standard data analysis methods.

Authors:  L B Sheiner
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.518

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Progress, obstacles, and limitations in the use of stem cells in organ-on-a-chip models.

Authors:  Alexa Wnorowski; Huaxiao Yang; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Opportunities and challenges in the wider adoption of liver and interconnected microphysiological systems.

Authors:  David J Hughes; Tomasz Kostrzewski; Emma L Sceats
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-05-15

3.  Advances in Engineered Human Liver Platforms for Drug Metabolism Studies.

Authors:  Gregory H Underhill; Salman R Khetani
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 4.  Microfabrication of liver and heart tissues for drug development.

Authors:  Grace E Brown; Salman R Khetani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling for First-In-Human Predictions: An Updated Model Building Strategy Illustrated with Challenging Industry Case Studies.

Authors:  Neil A Miller; Micaela B Reddy; Aki T Heikkinen; Viera Lukacova; Neil Parrott
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Authors:  Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marina Marinovich; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Silvia Pieper; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher J Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Jochem Louisse; Serge Rudaz; Emanuela Testai; Alfonso Lostia; Jean-Lou Dorne; Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 7.  Current Approaches for Predicting Human PK for Small Molecule Development Candidates: Findings from the IQ Human PK Prediction Working Group Survey.

Authors:  Carl Petersson; Xin Zhou; Joerg Berghausen; David Cebrian; Michael Davies; Kevin DeMent; Peter Eddershaw; Arian Emami Riedmaier; Alix F Leblanc; Nenad Manveski; Punit Marathe; Panteleimon D Mavroudis; Robin McDougall; Neil Parrott; Andreas Reichel; Charles Rotter; David Tess; Laurie P Volak; Guangqing Xiao; Zheng Yang; James Baker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Generation of HepG2 Cells with High Expression of Multiple Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes for Drug Discovery Research Using a PITCh System.

Authors:  Ryosuke Negoro; Mitsuki Tasaka; Sayaka Deguchi; Kazuo Takayama; Takuya Fujita
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 7.666

9.  Variability in Human In Vitro Enzyme Kinetics.

Authors:  Christopher R Gibson; Ying-Hong Wang; Ninad Varkhede; Bennett Ma
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

10.  Recent developments in in vitro and in vivo models for improved translation of preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data.

Authors:  Jaydeep Yadav; Mehdi El Hassani; Jasleen Sodhi; Volker M Lauschke; Jessica H Hartman; Laura E Russell
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.