| Literature DB >> 28050059 |
Agnieszka Żyłka1, Agnieszka Gala-Błądzińska1, Paulina Dumnicka2, Piotr Ceranowicz3, Marek Kuźniewski4, Krzysztof Gil5, Rafał Olszanecki6, Beata Kuśnierz-Cabala7.
Abstract
Background. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) may start as glomerular or tubular damage. We assessed kidney function during one-year-long observation of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after initiation of nephroprotective treatment, with emphasis on the changes in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL), and evaluated the association between tubular damage and cardiovascular complications of T2DM. Materials and Methods. Adult T2DM patients (55) were assessed initially and 30 patients after 1 year. Albumin and uNGAL and creatinine were measured in first morning urine. Albumin/creatinine (uACR) and uNGAL/creatinine (uNCR) ratios were calculated. Results. In logistic regression, both uACR above 30 mg/g and uNCR the median (21.3 μg/g) were associated with cardiovascular complications, independently of classical risk factors and diabetes duration. One year after initiation of treatment, a significant reduction in HbA1c was observed. BMI and lipid profiles did not change. Increase in serum creatinine and reduction in eGFR occurred, along with decrease in uNGAL and uNCR. Increasing uNCR and uACR were associated with higher control HbA1c. The increase in uNCR was more frequent in patients with hypertension. Conclusions. Better glycemic control in T2DM patients results in improved tubular function, as reflected by reduced uNCR and uNGAL. First morning urine uNGAL and uNCR may be useful to assess renal function and cardiovascular risk, along with albuminuria and eGFR.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28050059 PMCID: PMC5165154 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8489543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Baseline characteristics of the studied group of 55 T2DM patients with respect to cardiovascular complications of diabetes.
| Patients with cardiovascular complications ( | Patients without cardiovascular complications ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 70 ± 11 | 59 ± 15 | 0.022 |
| Female sex | 10 (53) | 19 (53) | 1.0 NS |
| Ischemic heart disease, | 17 (89) | — | — |
| Heart failure, | 6 (32) | — | — |
| Systemic atherosclerosis, | 5 (26) | — | — |
| T2DM duration, years | 7 (4–10) | 5 (1–10) | 0.1 NS |
| Hypertension, | 16 (84) | 26 (72) | 0.3 NS |
| Dyslipidemia, | 18 (95) | 33 (92) | 0.7 NS |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 32.6 ± 7.6 | 30.8 ± 5.2 | 0.5 NS |
| HbA1c, % | 6.2 (6.1–6.6) | 7.5 (6.2–9.4) | 0.2 NS |
| WBC, 103/ | 8.0 (5.3–9.7) | 7.1 (5.9–8.4) | 0.8 NS |
| Serum creatinine, | 64.5 (60.1–82.2) | 65.8 (58.8–76.9) | 0.6 NS |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 87 (71–94) | 95 (81–99) | 0.07 NS |
| Albuminuria, mg/L | 12.3 (7.2–41.2) | 9.5 (6.3–13.4) | 0.048 |
| uACR, mg/g | 16.0 (7.5–53.6) | 7.8 (3.4–13.2) | 0.005 |
| uNGAL, | 22.3 (10.4–56.9) | 18.8 (8.8–42.6) | 0.7 NS |
| uNCR, | 29.1 (13.4–58.8) | 16.2 (9.5–38.8) | 0.038 |
T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; N, number of patients; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; WBC, white blood cells; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; uNGAL, urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; uNCR, urinary NGAL/creatinine ratio; uACR, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio; NS, nonsignificant result.
Multiple logistic regression model showing the association between selected variables and cardiovascular complications among 55 T2DM patients evaluated at the beginning of the study.
| Independent variables | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 1.11 (0.99–1.25) | 0.07 NS |
| Female sex | 0.44 (0.05–3.80) | 0.4 NS |
| T2DM duration, years | 1.03 (0.84–1.26) | 0.8 NS |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 1.22 (1.00–1.48) | 0.041 |
| Hypertension | 5.21 (0.15–185) | 0.3 NS |
| Dyslipidemia | 0.16 (0.02–1.68) | 0.1 NS |
| uACR > 30 mg/g | 25.20 (1.01–639) | 0.042 |
| uNCR > 21.3 | 14.99 (1.01–247) | 0.048 |
| Whole model | chi2 = 19.8; | |
For abbreviations, see Table 1.
Characteristics of 30 T2DM patients with available follow-up data at the beginning of the study (baseline results) and after 12-month follow-up (control results).
| Baseline results | Control results |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI, kg/m2 | 30.9 ± 5.5 | 31.4 ± 5.7 | 0.6 NS |
| HbA1c, % | 7.98 ± 1.99 | 6.31 ± 0.93 | 0.037 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.2 ± 1.4 | 13.9 ± 1.4 | 0.019 |
| WBC, 103/ | 7.59 ± 2.39 | 7.34 ± 2.67 | 0.5 NS |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.38 (4.11–5.95) | 4.78 (4.01–5.86) | 0.3 NS |
| LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.10 (2.07–3.75) | 2.62 (1.98–3.94) | 0.3 NS |
| HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.32 (1.01–1.53) | 1.36 (1.03–1.49) | 0.1 NS |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.57 (1.13–1.89) | 1.53 (1.16–2.03) | 0.5 NS |
| Serum creatinine, | 68.1 (60.1–76.9) | 69.0 (61.9–77.8) | 0.035 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 94.4 (79.7–98.3) | 87.0 (74.6–99.0) | 0.023 |
| Albuminuria, mg/L | 8.53 (6.59–13.53) | 5.55 (2.14–19.75) | 0.2 NS |
| uACR, mg/g | 7.49 (3.39–13.38) | 4.69 (2.86–43.41) | 0.1 NS |
| uNGAL, | 18.00 (9.00–32.20) | 9.35 (2.50–19.30) | 0.018 |
| uNCR, | 16.18 (10.00–33.72) | 8.82 (3.09–26.83) | 0.037 |
| Leukocyturia, | 3 (10) | 5 (17) | 0.4 NS |
LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; see Table 1.
Figure 1Urinary NGAL concentrations at the beginning of the study (initial results) and after 1 year of nephroprotective treatment (control results) among 30 DKD patients with available follow-up data. Closed circles and solid lines represent patients with decreasing uNGAL; open squares and dashed lines represent patients with increasing uNGAL. For abbreviations, see Table 1.
Figure 2Statistically significant differences in laboratory test results between patients with different direction of change in the studied markers of kidney function. The change in the marker of kidney function was defined as the difference between the control value (after 12 months of treatment) and the initial value (at the beginning of the study). Increase or no change in eGFR. TG, triglycerides; see Tables 1 and 3.
Figure 3Numbers of patients in whom either a decrease or an increase in the values of uNCR and uACR was observed after 12 months of treatment in comparison with initial values. ↓: decrease in the value of a given marker as assessed after 12 months of the study; ↑: increase in the value of a given marker as assessed after 12 months of the study; For abbreviations, see Table 1.