Literature DB >> 27021648

Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors.

Christian Beste1, Ann-Kathrin Stock2, Jörg T Epplen3, Larissa Arning4.   

Abstract

Action control is achieved through a multitude of cognitive processes. One of them is the ability to inhibit responses, for which the dopaminergic systems is known to play an important role. Many lines of psychophysiological research substantiate that two distinct response inhibition subprocesses exist, but it has remained elusive whether they can be attributed to distinct neurobiological factors governing the dopaminergic system. We, therefore, investigated this question by examining the effects of DRD1 (rs4532) and DRD2 (rs6277) receptor polymorphisms on electrophysiological correlates of response inhibition subprocesses (i.e., Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3) in 195 healthy human subjects with a standard Go/Nogo task. The results show that response inhibition performance at a behavioral level is affected by DRD1 and DRD2 receptor variation. However, from an electrophysiological point of view these effects emerge via different mechanisms selectively affected by DRD1 and DRD2 receptor variation. While the D1 receptor system is associated with pre-motor inhibition electrophysiological correlates of response inhibition processes (Nogo-N2), the D2 receptor system is associated with electrophysiological correlates of outcome evaluation processes. Dissociable cognitive-neurophysiological subprocesses of response inhibition are hence attributable to distinct dopamine receptor systems.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRD1; DRD2; Dopamine; EEG; Response inhibition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021648     DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  12 in total

1.  On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.

Authors:  Benjamin Bodmer; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The norepinephrine system affects specific neurophysiological subprocesses in the modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Tjalf Ziemssen; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Conflict processing in juvenile patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and healthy controls - Two pathways to success.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Maja von der Hagen; Katharina Papenhagen; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 - clinically similar, neurophysiologically different.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Maja von der Hagen; Katharina Papenhagen; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Computational Modeling for Neuropsychological Assessment of Bradyphrenia in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Alexander Steinke; Florian Lange; Caroline Seer; Merle K Hendel; Bruno Kopp
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A comparative study on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying effects of methylphenidate and neurofeedback on inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Julia Friedrich; Marie Luise Schreiter; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Differences in response inhibition processes between adolescents and adults are modulated by sensory processes.

Authors:  Benjamin Bodmer; Julia Friedrich; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  The Role of DRD1 and DRD2 Receptors for Response Selection Under Varying Complexity Levels: Implications for Metacontrol Processes.

Authors:  Nicolas Zink; Wiebke Bensmann; Larissa Arning; Lorenza S Colzato; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Machine learning provides novel neurophysiological features that predict performance to inhibit automated responses.

Authors:  Amirali Vahid; Moritz Mückschel; Andres Neuhaus; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.