Literature DB >> 28044247

"Plug and Play": a novel technique utilising existing technology to get the most out of the robot.

Todd G Manning1,2, Daniel Christidis3,4, Jasamine Coles-Black5, Shannon McGrath3,4, Jonathan O'Brien3,4, Jason Chuen5, Damien Bolton3, Nathan Lawrentschuk3,6,7.   

Abstract

We describe a simple technique in which current and freely available technology can be utilised by surgeons while operating the Da Vinci Si/Xi Surgical Robotic systems. This technique allows for a parallel intraoperative display within the surgical console of any desired subject material from a standard computer, utilising commercially available cabling. The ability to view 3D reconstructed images, patient radiology and patient results within the console whilst operating, has the potential to increase operative efficiency, reduce error and aid in adequate resection of tissues. The ease with which our technique is achieved, the benefits of its use and the low cost associated with its implementation support our suggestion that all robotic surgeons incorporate this into their regular operative setup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D images; Console display; Intraoperative display; Robotic surgery; TilePro™

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28044247     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0670-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  12 in total

Review 1.  Robotics and general surgery.

Authors:  Brian P Jacob; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Using 3D Printing to Create Personalized Brain Models for Neurosurgical Training and Preoperative Planning.

Authors:  Caitlin C Ploch; Chris S S A Mansi; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Inventing the future of surgery.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Preoperative Imaging Improves Surgical Success in Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Tobias Simpfendörfer; Ziyao Li; Claudia Gasch; Frederik Drosdzol; Markus Fangerau; Michael Müller; Lena Maier-Hein; Markus Hohenfellner; Dogu Teber
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures.

Authors:  M A Talamini; S Chapman; S Horgan; W S Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotic vs. Standard Laparoscopic Technique - What is Better?

Authors:  Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Longke Ran; Jing Jin; Yan Xu; Youquan Bu; Fangzhou Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Novel application of simultaneous multi-image display during complex robotic abdominal procedures.

Authors:  Yanghee Woo; Gi Hong Choi; Byung Soh Min; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Robotic surgery versus laparoscopy; a comparison between two robotic systems and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Christopher Nguan; Andrew Girvan; Patrick P Luke
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-04

10.  Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Robert C Tolboom; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-01-25
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Three dimensional models in uro-oncology: a future built with additive fabrication.

Authors:  Todd G Manning; Jonathan S O'Brien; Daniel Christidis; Marlon Perera; Jasamine Coles-Black; Jason Chuen; Damien M Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.