Literature DB >> 28043701

Unconventional oil and gas spills: Materials, volumes, and risks to surface waters in four states of the U.S.

Kelly O Maloney1, Sharon Baruch-Mordo2, Lauren A Patterson3, Jean-Philippe Nicot4, Sally A Entrekin5, Joseph E Fargione6, Joseph M Kiesecker2, Kate E Konschnik7, Joseph N Ryan8, Anne M Trainor9, James E Saiers10, Hannah J Wiseman11.   

Abstract

Extraction of oil and gas from unconventional sources, such as shale, has dramatically increased over the past ten years, raising the potential for spills or releases of chemicals, waste materials, and oil and gas. We analyzed spill data associated with unconventional wells from Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota and Pennsylvania from 2005 to 2014, where we defined unconventional wells as horizontally drilled into an unconventional formation. We identified materials spilled by state and for each material we summarized frequency, volumes and spill rates. We evaluated the environmental risk of spills by calculating distance to the nearest stream and compared these distances to existing setback regulations. Finally, we summarized relative importance to drinking water in watersheds where spills occurred. Across all four states, we identified 21,300 unconventional wells and 6622 reported spills. The number of horizontal well bores increased sharply beginning in the late 2000s; spill rates also increased for all states except PA where the rate initially increased, reached a maximum in 2009 and then decreased. Wastewater, crude oil, drilling waste, and hydraulic fracturing fluid were the materials most often spilled; spilled volumes of these materials largely ranged from 100 to 10,000L. Across all states, the average distance of spills to a stream was highest in New Mexico (1379m), followed by Colorado (747m), North Dakota (598m) and then Pennsylvania (268m), and 7.0, 13.3, and 20.4% of spills occurred within existing surface water setback regulations of 30.5, 61.0, and 91.4m, respectively. Pennsylvania spills occurred in watersheds with a higher relative importance to drinking water than the other three states. Results from this study can inform risk assessments by providing improved input parameters on volume and rates of materials spilled, and guide regulations and the management policy of spills. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorado; Extraction; Hydraulic fracturing; New Mexico; North Dakota; Pennsylvania; Setback regulations; Shale oil and gas; Spill rates; Wells

Year:  2016        PMID: 28043701     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  12 in total

1.  In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Community Members.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2020-02-06

2.  Exposure to a mixture of 23 chemicals associated with unconventional oil and gas operations alters immune response to challenge in adult mice.

Authors:  Colleen T O'Dell; Lisbeth A Boule; Jacques Robert; Steve N Georas; Sophia Eliseeva; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Regional Scale Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination from Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction.

Authors:  Mario A Soriano; Nicole C Deziel; James E Saiers
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 4.  Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry.

Authors:  Jill Johnston; Lara Cushing
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2020-03

Review 5.  Developmental exposure to a mixture of unconventional oil and gas chemicals: A review of experimental effects on adult health, behavior, and disease.

Authors:  S C Nagel; C D Kassotis; L N Vandenberg; B P Lawrence; J Robert; V D Balise
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.102

6.  Unconventional oil and gas chemicals and wastewater-impacted water samples promote adipogenesis via PPARγ-dependent and independent mechanisms in 3T3-L1 cells.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Physiological and morphological investigation of Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) gill filaments with high salinity exposure and recovery.

Authors:  Salvatore D Blair; Derrick Matheson; Greg G Goss
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Shale gas development has limited effects on stream biology and geochemistry in a gradient-based, multiparameter study in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Adam C Mumford; Kelly O Maloney; Denise M Akob; Sarah Nettemann; Arianne Proctor; Jason Ditty; Luke Ulsamer; Josh Lookenbill; Isabelle M Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evaluating corticosterone as a biomarker for amphibians exposed to increased salinity and ambient corticosterone.

Authors:  Brian J Tornabene; Blake R Hossack; Erica J Crespi; Creagh W Breuner
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Public Health and Unconventional Oil and Gas Extraction Including Fracking: Global Lessons from a Scottish Government Review.

Authors:  Andrew Watterson; William Dinan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.