BACKGROUND: Organismal Performance Assays (OPAs) are a unique toxicity quantification method used to assess the safety of potentially toxic compounds, such as pharmaceuticals. OPAs utilize genetically diverse wild mice (Mus musculus) housed in semi-natural enclosures wherein exposed individuals compete directly with controls for resources. Previously, OPAs have been successful in detecting adverse effects in mice that were exposed to paroxetine. Here, we further test OPAs utility in pharmaceutical safety assessment by testing OPAs with rofecoxib, a drug with known adverse effects in humans. METHODS: We exposed mice to rofecoxib (~37.5 mg/kg/day) during gestation and into early adulthood. Exposure ceased when individuals were released into enclosures. Five independent populations were established and rofecoxib-exposed individuals (n = 58) competed directly with control individuals (n = 58) over 28 weeks. Organismal performance was determined by quantifying reproduction, survival and male competitive ability. RESULTS: In enclosures, rofecoxib-exposed males had equal reproduction, survival and competitive ability. Rofecoxib-exposed females had equal survival compared to controls but experienced 40% higher reproductive output. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse health effects of rofecoxib seen in humans escaped detection by OPAs, just as they had during traditional preclinical assays. These results may be explained by the exposure design (in enclosures, all animals were on the control diet), the relatively short duration of exposure, species differences, or because the health benefits of the drug negated the side effects. Similarly to numerous assays used in preclinical trials, OPAs cannot reveal all maladies, despite their demonstrated sensitivity in detecting cryptic toxicity from numerous exposures.
BACKGROUND: Organismal Performance Assays (OPAs) are a unique toxicity quantification method used to assess the safety of potentially toxic compounds, such as pharmaceuticals. OPAs utilize genetically diverse wild mice (Mus musculus) housed in semi-natural enclosures wherein exposed individuals compete directly with controls for resources. Previously, OPAs have been successful in detecting adverse effects in mice that were exposed to paroxetine. Here, we further test OPAs utility in pharmaceutical safety assessment by testing OPAs with rofecoxib, a drug with known adverse effects in humans. METHODS: We exposed mice to rofecoxib (~37.5 mg/kg/day) during gestation and into early adulthood. Exposure ceased when individuals were released into enclosures. Five independent populations were established and rofecoxib-exposed individuals (n = 58) competed directly with control individuals (n = 58) over 28 weeks. Organismal performance was determined by quantifying reproduction, survival and male competitive ability. RESULTS: In enclosures, rofecoxib-exposed males had equal reproduction, survival and competitive ability. Rofecoxib-exposed females had equal survival compared to controls but experienced 40% higher reproductive output. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse health effects of rofecoxib seen in humans escaped detection by OPAs, just as they had during traditional preclinical assays. These results may be explained by the exposure design (in enclosures, all animals were on the control diet), the relatively short duration of exposure, species differences, or because the health benefits of the drug negated the side effects. Similarly to numerous assays used in preclinical trials, OPAs cannot reveal all maladies, despite their demonstrated sensitivity in detecting cryptic toxicity from numerous exposures.
Authors: Christopher B Cunningham; James S Ruff; Kevin Chase; Wayne K Potts; David R Carrier Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Shannon M Gaukler; James S Ruff; Tessa Galland; Kirstie A Kandaris; Tristan K Underwood; Nicole M Liu; Elizabeth L Young; Linda C Morrison; Garold S Yost; Wayne K Potts Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Peter Jüni; Linda Nartey; Stephan Reichenbach; Rebekka Sterchi; Paul A Dieppe; Matthias Egger Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Dec 4-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James S Ruff; Amanda K Suchy; Sara A Hugentobler; Mirtha M Sosa; Bradley L Schwartz; Linda C Morrison; Sin H Gieng; Mark K Shigenaga; Wayne K Potts Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Shannon M Gaukler; James S Ruff; Tessa Galland; Tristan K Underwood; Kirstie A Kandaris; Nicole M Liu; Linda C Morrison; John M Veranth; Wayne K Potts Journal: Evol Appl Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 5.183