Literature DB >> 28041754

Not all patients meet the 1day per percent burn rule: A simple method for predicting hospital length of stay in patients with burn.

Sandra L Taylor1, Soman Sen2, David G Greenhalgh2, MaryBeth Lawless3, Terese Curri3, Tina L Palmieri4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hospital length of stay (LOS) is utilized to estimate resource utilization and quality of care. In burns the LOS estimation is 1day per percent total body surface area burn (1day/%TBSA). Our purpose was to evaluate the 1day/%TBSA burn rule and develop simple accurate formulas to predict LOS.
METHODS: The American Burn Association National Burn Repository (NBR) from 2000 to 2013 was utilized to collate data on patients >18 years. We divided 106,543 records in half, utilizing one set to develop a model (training set) and the other to test the model (test set). We calculated the difference between observed and predicted LOS for all patients, and then examined the effect of inhalation injury and age using a linear regression model containing TBSA, age, inhalation injury and all two-way interactions. We compared predictive performance of the linear regression model to the 1day/%TBSA rule. Finally, we developed and validated three simple formulas to more accurately predict LOS than the 1day/% TBSA rule.
RESULTS: LOS was significantly associated with patient age, TBSA, inhalation injury, and all two-way interactions. For patients <40 years without inhalation injury the main effect of TBSA was 0.71. For each decade increase in age, LOS increased by 0.74days/TBSA burn; inhalation injury added 1.70days. LOS was highly variable among patients with similar burn size, age and inhalation injury due to concomitant trauma, complications, and comorbidities. We developed 3 formulas to estimate patient LOS: (1) inhalation injury present, regardless of age (2) no inhalation injury and ≥40 years old (3) no inhalation injury and <40 years old.
CONCLUSIONS: Traditional LOS estimates of 1day/%TBSA burn rule is biased, underestimating LOS, particularly for patients >40 years with inhalation injury. The following formulas applied at admission can accurately estimate hospital LOS, improve prediction over 1day/%TBSA, and provide results comparable to complicated models. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burn; Hospital length of stay; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041754     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  The Role Of Comorbidities On Outcome Prediction In Acute Burn Patients.

Authors:  C Brandão; R Meireles; I Brito; S Ramos; L Cabral
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 2.  Burns in Israel: Etiologic, Demographic, and Clinical trends-A 9-Year Updated Comprehensive Study, 2004-2010 versus 2011-2019.

Authors:  Irit Cohen-Manheim; Moti Harats; Sharon Goldman; Dmitry Beylin; Josef Haik; Moran Bodas; Adi Givon; Rachel Kornhaber; Yehiel Hayun; Michelle Cleary; Daniel Hilewitz; Ariel Tessone
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.195

3.  Contributors to the length-of-stay trajectory in burn-injured patients.

Authors:  Reinhard Dolp; Sarah Rehou; Matthew R McCann; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Length of Stay and Costs with Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Versus Split-Thickness Skin Grafts: Burn Care Data from US Centers.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Carter; Joshua S Carson; William L Hickerson; Lisa Rae; Syed F Saquib; Lucy A Wibbenmeyer; Russell V Becker; Thomas P Walsh; Jeremiah A Sparks
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  Massive Burns: Retrospective Analysis of Changes in Outcomes Indicators Across 18 Years.

Authors:  Joachim N Meuli; Olivier Pantet; Mette M Berger; Laurent Waselle; Wassim Raffoul
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.845

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.