| Literature DB >> 28040783 |
Andrew T Grainger1, Michael B Jones2, Mei-Hua Chen2, Weibin Shi3,2.
Abstract
Atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries is a major cause of ischemic stroke, which accounts for 85% of all stroke cases. Genetic factors contributing to carotid atherosclerosis remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify chromosomal regions harboring genes contributing to carotid atherosclerosis in mice. From an intercross between BALB/cJ (BALB) and SM/J (SM) apolipoprotein E-deficient (Apoe-/-) mice, 228 female F2 mice were generated and fed a "Western" diet for 12 wk. Atherosclerotic lesion sizes in the left carotid artery were quantified. Across the entire genome, 149 genetic markers were genotyped. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis revealed eight loci for carotid lesion sizes, located on chromosomes 1, 5, 12, 13, 15, 16, and 18. Combined cross-linkage analysis using data from this cross, and two previous F2 crosses derived from BALB, C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ strains, identified five significant QTL on chromosomes 5, 9, 12, and 13, and nine suggestive QTL for carotid atherosclerosis. Of them, the QTL on chromosome 12 had a high LOD score of 9.95. Bioinformatic analysis prioritized Arhgap5, Akap6, Mipol1, Clec14a, Fancm, Nin, Dact1, Rtn1, and Slc38a6 as probable candidate genes for this QTL. Atherosclerotic lesion sizes were significantly correlated with non-HDL cholesterol levels (r = 0.254; p = 0.00016) but inversely correlated with HDL cholesterol levels (r = -0.134; p = 0.049) in the current cross. Thus, we demonstrated the polygenic control of carotid atherosclerosis in mice. The correlations of carotid lesion sizes with non-HDL and HDL suggest that genetic factors exert effects on carotid atherosclerosis partially through modulation of lipoprotein homeostasis.Entities:
Keywords: dyslipidemia; haplotype analysis; linkage mapping; plaque; vessels
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28040783 PMCID: PMC5295616 DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.037879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Frequency distributions of untransformed (A) and log2-transformed (B) total carotid lesion areas of 228 female F2 mice derived from BALB-Apoe−/− and SM-Apoe−/− mice. Each histogram indicates the number of individual F2 mice with a certain lesion area. Apoe−/−, apolipoprotein E-deficient.
Figure 2Genome-wide QTL analysis for carotid lesion sizes in the F2 population. Chromosomes 1 through 20 are represented numerically on the x-axis. y-axis represents LOD score. The horizontal dashed line denotes the genome-wide threshold for suggestive linkage, which was determined by 1000 permutations. Top panel: a genome-wide scan using untransformed carotid lesion data performed with the nonparametric algorism; bottom panel: a genome-wide scan using log2-transformed carotid lesion data performed with the parametric mode. LOD, logarithm of the odds; QTL, quantitative trait locus.
QTL identified for carotid lesion areas in female F2 mice derived from an intercross between BALB-Apoe−/− and SM-Apoe−/− mice
| Locus | Chr | Analysis | LOD | Peak (cM) | 95% C.I. | High Allele | Mode of Inheritance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nonparametric | 2.17 | 0.535 | 91.52 | 75.52–97.02 | — | Heterosis | |
| 5 | Nonparametric | 2.33 | 0.422 | 63.4 | 34.19–101.24 | BALB | Additive | |
| 5 | Nonparametric | 2.03 | 0.630 | 99.4 | 79.4–101.2 | BALB | Dominant | |
| 12 | Nonparametric | 2.48 | 0.324 | 30.28 | 19.41–63.41 | SM | Additive | |
| 13 | Nonparametric | 2.8 | 0.163 | 34.02 | 22.02–46.02 | SM | Dominant | |
| 15 | Nonparametric | 2.24 | 0.474 | 46.74 | 26.74–62.74 | SM | Recessive | |
| 16 | Nonparametric | 2.58 | 0.274 | 44.66 | 13.43–46.66 | BALB | Dominant | |
| 18 | Nonparametric | 2.22 | 0.497 | 16.27 | 3.73–27.73 | SM | Additive | |
| 1 | Parametric | 2.23 | 0.545 | 87.52 | 77.52–97.02 | — | Heterosis | |
| 5 | Parametric | 2.38 | 0.413 | 67.27 | 33.4–101.4 | BALB | Additive | |
| 5 | Parametric | 2.03 | 0.630 | 99.4 | 79.4–101.2 | BALB | Additive | |
| 12 | Parametric | 2.1 | 0.644 | 30.28 | 23.41–65.41 | SM | Additive | |
| 13 | Parametric | 2.64 | 0.267 | 32.02 | 22.02–47.99 | SM | Dominant | |
| 16 | Parametric | 2.81 | 0.205 | 46.66 | 13.43–46.66 | BALB | Dominant | |
| 18 | Parametric | 2.21 | 0.552 | 16.27 | 3.73–25.73 | SM | Additive |
Chr, chromosome; LOD, logarithm of the odds; QTL, quantitative trait locus.
LOD scores were obtained from genome-wide scans using J/qtl. LOD score threshold for suggestive QTL > 2.054; for significance > 3.314 established by 1000 permutation tests.
p-values represent genome-wide significance at each locus.
95% C.I. was determined through whole-genome scans.
Inheritance was determined based on the effect of each parental allele at the nearest genomic marker.
Effects of BALB and SM alleles on carotid lesion area at identified QTL in female F2 mice derived from BALB-Apoe−/− and SM-Apoe−/− mice
| Locus Name | Chr | Analysis | Peak Marker | Peak (cM) | BB | BS | SS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nonparametric | rs3685643 | 91.52 | 281.5 ± 662.4 | 522.8 ± 1049.5 | 260.9 ± 466.9 | 0.016 | |
| 5 | Nonparametric | rs3726547 | 63.4 | 604.1 ± 1250.9 | 341.5 ± 710.1 | 273.3 ± 504.0 | 0.006953 | |
| 5 | Nonparametric | rs13478578 | 99.4 | 454.6 ± 629.3 | 412.1 ± 1023.7 | 285.8 ± 635.7 | 0.008146 | |
| 12 | Nonparametric | rs13481509 | 30.28 | 171.1 ± 389.1 | 374.9 ± 952.2 | 652.9 ± 917.3 | 0.002917 | |
| 13 | Nonparametric | rs6259014 | 34.02 | 313.9 ± 650.0 | 412.7 ± 938.2 | 427.7 ± 793.2 | 0.143 | |
| 15 | Nonparametric | rs13482641 | 46.74 | 244.8 ± 397.0 | 294.2 ± 664.1 | 711.2 ± 1281.3 | 0.03 | |
| 16 | Nonparametric | rs3721202 | 44.66 | 426.5 ± 1249.9 | 485.8 ± 192.8 | 192.8 ± 405.0 | 0.002091 | |
| 18 | Nonparametric | rs3683699 | 16.27 | 256.1 ± 440.2 | 423.9 ± 1059.8 | 539.0 ± 759.6 | 0.005427 | |
| 1 | Parametric | rs3685643 | 87.52 | 4.3 ± 3.8 | 6.1 ± 3.7 | 5.8 ± 3.2 | 0.01199282 | |
| 5 | Parametric | rs3726547 | 67.27 | 6.8 ± 3.3 | 5.2 ± 3.6 | 4.8 ± 3.8 | 0.00624255 | |
| 5 | Parametric | rs13478578 | 99.4 | 6.4 ± 3.6 | 5.6 ± 3.5 | 4.2 ± 3.8 | 0.00941731 | |
| 12 | Parametric | rs13481509 | 30.28 | 4.7 ± 3.2 | 5.3 ± 3.8 | 6.8 ± 3.8 | 0.00787988 | |
| 13 | Parametric | rs6259014 | 32.02 | 4.6 ± 3.8 | 5.7 ± 3.7 | 6.0 ± 3.6 | 0.14731571 | |
| 16 | Parametric | rs3721202 | 46.66 | 5.8 ± 3.4 | 6.2 ± 3.7 | 4.0 ± 3.6 | 0.00150063 | |
| 18 | Parametric | rs3683699 | 16.27 | 5.3 ± 3.5 | 5.0 ± 3.9 | 7.1 ± 3.2 | 0.00613849 |
Measurements for carotid lesion areas are expressed as means ± SD. The unit for these measurements is: µm2 × 1000 for nonparametric analysis. For parametric analysis, the values are log2-transformed total carotid lesion areas. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used on the nonparametric data and ANOVA on the parametric data to determine the significance (p-value) of the differences among the BB, BS, and SS genotypes. Chr, chromosome; BB, homozygous for the BALB allele at the linked peak marker; BS, heterozygous for both BALB and SMJ; SS, homozygous for the SMJ allele.
Figure 3Genome-wide QTL analysis for carotid lesion sizes using combined data from the current cross and two previously reported B6 × BALB and B6 × C3H Apoe−/− intercrosses. The horizontal dotted lines indicate the thresholds for genome-wide suggestive and significant linkage, as determined by 1000 permutations. Apoe−/−, apolipoprotein E-deficient; LOD, logarithm of the odds; QTL, quantitative trait locus.
Significant and suggestive QTL for carotid atherosclerosis identified in combined cross analysis of data from the current cross and the two previously reported crosses
| Locus | Chr | Trait | LOD | Peak (cM) | 95% C.I. | Peak (Mb) | 95% C.I. (Mb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Carotid lesion | 2.77 | 80.22 | 44.22–98.22 | 159.59 | 71.96–170.59 | |
| 3 | Carotid lesion | 2.31 | 50.01 | 26.01–64.01 | 114.85 | 56.96–138.77 | |
| 6 | Carotid lesion | 2.15 | 66.21 | 1.53–88.79 | 120.60 | 6.44–145.75 | |
| 11 | Carotid lesion | 3.02 | 26.1 | 18.2–32.2 | 45.28 | 30.91–54.19 | |
| 11 | Carotid lesion | 3.32 | 51 | 17.99–69.99 | 83.84 | 30.91–105.15 | |
| 15 | Carotid lesion | 2.35 | 11.26 | 3.8–37.8 | 30.76 | 7.87–71.92 | |
| 16 | Carotid lesion | 2.94 | 41.66 | 28.95–43.66 | 64.11 | 37.35–72.76 | |
| 18 | Carotid lesion | 3.01 | 39.73 | 31.73–41.73 | 62.50 | 56.27–65.17 | |
| 19 | Carotid lesion | 2.74 | 2.43 | 2.43–26.43 | 3.65 | 3.65–36.64 |
LOD score threshold for suggestive QTL was 2.128 and was 3.508 for significant QTL. Significant QTL are highlighted in bold. Chr, chromosome; LOD, logarithm of the odds; QTL, quantitative trait loci.
Figure 4Interval mapping graph for carotid lesion size on chromosome 5 using combined data from the current cross and previously reported B6 × BALB and B6 × C3H Apoe−/− intercrosses. The horizontal line denotes the threshold for significant linkage. Apoe−/−, apolipoprotein E-deficient; LOD, logarithm of the odds.
Haplotype analysis for Cath1 on chromosome 12 (52–75 Mb)
| Chr | Position | Gene | dbSNP | High Allele | Low Allele | Consequence | Amino Acid Change | SIFT Score | Tolerated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C57BL/6 | BALB_cJ | C3H_HeH | ||||||||
| 12 | 52006466 | Dtd2 | rs46701436 | A | G | G | Missense variant | Cn 7:V/A | 0.92 | Yes |
| 12 | 52023971 | Gpr33 | rs29173669 | A | G | G | Missense variant | Cn 95:V/A | 0.71 | Yes |
| 12 | 52027979 | Gpr33 | rs51561875 | T | G | G | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 52027989 | Gpr33 | rs49936313 | T | A | A | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 52027993 | Gpr33 | rs47019843 | C | T | T | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 52519522 | Arhgap5 | rs29198609 | T | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 1092:V/A | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 52887261 | Akap6 | rs29183247 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 512:R/Q | 0.2 | Yes |
| 12 | 52887389 | Akap6 | rs29223294 | A | G | G | Missense variant | Cn 555:T/A | 0.47 | Yes |
| 12 | 53140291 | Akap6 | rs48484112 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 1496:R/H | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 54203369 | Egln3 | rs29130898 | A | G | G | Missense variant | Cn 65:C/R | 0.89 | Yes |
| 12 | 54203615 | Egln3 | rs29122127 | T | G | G | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 54203690 | Egln3 | rs13473456 | G | A | A | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 54695720 | Eapp | rs29183105 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 22:A/V | 0.01 | No |
| 12 | 54941453 | Baz1a | rs29195192 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 88:L/F | 0.04 | Yes |
| 12 | 54999084 | Baz1a | rs29196908 | G | C | C | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 57303392 | Mipol1 | rs29163022 | G | A | A | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 57325598 | Mipol1 | rs46300008 | A | G | G | Missense variant | Cn 148:K/E | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 57325623 | Mipol1 | rs13481473 | A | G | G | Missense variant | Cn 156:H/R | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 57542267 | Foxa1 | rs13481474 | T | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 389:H/R | 0 | No |
| 12 | 57576142 | Ttc6 | rs50478178 | G | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 109:R/P | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 57725789 | Ttc6 | rs48534883 | T | C | C | Splice region variant | |||
| 12 | 58267790 | Clec14a | rs31966428 | T | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 349:I/V | 0.23 | Yes |
| 12 | 58268339 | Clec14a | rs13465063 | T | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 166:T/A | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 58268988 | Clec14a | rs29162388 | C | G | G | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 58268992 | Clec14a | rs29194398 | G | C | C | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 64471729 | Fscb | rs13481500 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 988:P/S | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 64472091 | Fscb | rs29131205 | G | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 867:A/G | 0.21 | Yes |
| 12 | 64472965 | Fscb | rs585463036 | C | A | A | Missense variant | |||
| 12 | 64473313 | Fscb | rs29220106 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 460:P/S | 0.2 | Yes |
| 12 | 64950146 | Klhl28 | rs33846378 | C | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 474:V/I | 0.07 | Yes |
| 12 | 65113969 | Fancm | rs212043559 | A | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 1407:N/I | 0 | No |
| 12 | 65130342 | Fancm | rs29212900 | A | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 1987:I/L | 0.47 | Yes |
| 12 | 65130397 | Fancm | rs29213465 | A | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 2005:Q/L | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 65130436 | Fancm | rs29184120 | A | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 2018:K/T | 0 | No (low confidence) |
| 12 | 65149007 | Mis18bp1 | rs50634267 | C | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 661: R/Q | 0.27 | Yes |
| 12 | 65152837 | Mis18bp1 | rs29200949 | T | C | C | Splice region variant | |||
| 12 | 65172467 | Mis18bp1 | rs3695606 | T | A | A | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 65172551 | Mis18bp1 | rs3696207 | A | G | G | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 69204274 | Pole2 | rs3704977 | T | C | C | Splice region variant | |||
| 12 | 69223117 | Pole2 | rs29135637 | T | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 78:M/V | 0.43 | Yes |
| 12 | 69741794 | Atp5s | rs29193315 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 156: V/I | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 70180988 | Abhd12b | rs29173916 | G | T* | T* | Missense variant | Cn 258:M/I | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 70183081 | Abhd12b | rs51691757 | A | G | G | Splice region variant | |||
| 12 | 70183205 | Abhd12b | rs32247424 | A | G* | G* | Stop retained variant, 3ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 70193813 | Pygl | rs32246688 | G | T | T | Splice region variant | |||
| 12 | 70197551 | Pygl | rs29151561 | A | G | G | Splice region variant | |||
| 12 | 70201877 | Pygl | rs13467444 | T | C | C | Missense variant | Cn 323:M/V | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 70231391 | Pygl | rs45983203 | C | T | T | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 70231392 | Pygl | rs48603304 | T | A | A | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 70231439 | Pygl | rs50231886 | A | T | T | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 70231450 | Pygl | rs32251907 | A | T | T | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 72454073 | Lrrc9 | rs29198846 | G | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 191:R/H | 0.97 | Yes |
| 12 | 73281229 | Trmt5 | rs29130757 | G | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 400:P/H | 0 | No |
| 12 | 73285238 | Trmt5 | rs29166240 | A | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 15:L/M | 0.15 | No (low confidence) |
| 12 | 73285259 | Trmt5 | rs29162033 | A | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 8:F/I | 0.06 | Yes (low confidence) |
| 12 | 73285271 | Trmt5 | rs29141846 | C | A | A | Missense variant | Cn 4:V/L | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 73287081 | Slc38a6 | rs48749977 | T | C | C | 5ʹ-UTR variant | |||
| 12 | 73350619 | Slc38a6 | rs13481528 | C | T | T | Missense variant | Cn 345:A/V | 1 | Yes |
Functional candidate genes are denoted in bold. A smaller SIFT score denotes a higher likelihood of protein function change. Chr, chromosome; dbSNP, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database identifier; SIFT, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant; Cn, Coding non-synonymous polymorphism; UTR, untranslated region.
Figure 5Scatterplots showing the correlations of carotid lesion sizes with plasma non-HDL (A), HDL cholesterol (B), triglyceride (C), and glucose (D) in the F2 population. Each point represents an individual value of a F2 mouse. The correlation coefficient (r) and significance (p) are shown. Log2-transformed carotid total areas were used for the analyses. HDL, high-density lipoprotein.