Hepatic fibrosis is associated with an overproduction of matrix proteins and a pathological increase of liver stiffness. Noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR) quantification of matrix can be assessed with a collagen-binding molecular MR probe and stiffness by MR elastography, complementary techniques. This study used both imaging techniques to more accurately stage hepatic fibrosis in a rat model. Thirty rats with varying levels of diethylnitrosamine-induced liver fibrosis were imaged before and 45 minutes after injection of collagen-specific probe EP-3533. MR elastography was performed in the same imaging session. Changes in liver relaxation rate post-EP-3533 and liver stiffness were compared to the collagen proportional area determined by histology and to Ishak scoring using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Collagen imaging was most sensitive to early fibrosis, while elastography was more sensitive to advanced fibrosis. This complementary feature enabled the formulation of a composite model using multivariate analysis of variance. This model incorporated the discriminating advantages of both MR techniques, resulting in more accurate staging throughout fibrotic progression. CONCLUSION: Collagen molecular MR imaging is complementary to MR elastography, and combining the two techniques in a single exam leads to increased diagnostic accuracy for all stages of fibrosis. (Hepatology 2017;65:1015-1025).
Hepatic fibrosis is associated with an overproduction of matrix proteins and a pathological increase of liver stiffness. Noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR) quantification of matrix can be assessed with a collagen-binding molecular MR probe and stiffness by MR elastography, complementary techniques. This study used both imaging techniques to more accurately stage hepatic fibrosis in a rat model. Thirty rats with varying levels of diethylnitrosamine-induced liver fibrosis were imaged before and 45 minutes after injection of collagen-specific probe EP-3533. MR elastography was performed in the same imaging session. Changes in liver relaxation rate post-EP-3533 and liver stiffness were compared to the collagen proportional area determined by histology and to Ishak scoring using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Collagen imaging was most sensitive to early fibrosis, while elastography was more sensitive to advanced fibrosis. This complementary feature enabled the formulation of a composite model using multivariate analysis of variance. This model incorporated the discriminating advantages of both MR techniques, resulting in more accurate staging throughout fibrotic progression. CONCLUSION: Collagen molecular MR imaging is complementary to MR elastography, and combining the two techniques in a single exam leads to increased diagnostic accuracy for all stages of fibrosis. (Hepatology 2017;65:1015-1025).
Authors: Paul R Hutson; Mark E Crawford; Ronald L Sorkness Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2003-07-05 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Bryan C Fuchs; Huifang Wang; Yan Yang; Lan Wei; Miloslav Polasek; Daniel T Schühle; Gregory Y Lauwers; Ashfaq Parkar; Anthony J Sinskey; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Miloslav Polasek; Bryan C Fuchs; Ritika Uppal; Daniel T Schühle; Jamu K Alford; Galen S Loving; Suguru Yamada; Lan Wei; Gregory Y Lauwers; Alexander R Guimaraes; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Patrick A Helm; Peter Caravan; Brent A French; Vincent Jacques; Luhua Shen; Yaqin Xu; Ronald J Beyers; R Jack Roy; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Eleni G Tzortzaki; Jay A Tischfield; Amrik Sahota; Nikolaos M Siafakas; Marion K Gordon; Donald R Gerecke Journal: Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol Date: 2003-12
Authors: Pauline Désogère; Luis F Tapias; Tyson A Rietz; Nicholas Rotile; Francesco Blasi; Helen Day; Justin Elliott; Bryan C Fuchs; Michael Lanuti; Peter Caravan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jeanne M Horowitz; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Kartik Jhaveri; Patrick Kamath; Michael A Ohliger; Anthony E Samir; Alvin C Silva; Bachir Taouli; Michael S Torbenson; Michael L Wells; Benjamin Yeh; Frank H Miller Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2017-08
Authors: Howard H Chen; Philip A Waghorn; Lan Wei; Luis F Tapias; Daniel T Schühle; Nicholas J Rotile; Chloe M Jones; Richard J Looby; Gaofeng Zhao; Justin M Elliott; Clemens K Probst; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Andrew M Tager; Kenneth K Tanabe; Michael Lanuti; Bryan C Fuchs; Peter Caravan Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-06-02
Authors: Iris Y Zhou; Veronica Clavijo Jordan; Nicholas J Rotile; Eman Akam; Smitha Krishnan; Gunisha Arora; Hema Krishnan; Hannah Slattery; Noah Warner; Nathaniel Mercaldo; Christian T Farrar; Jeremy Wellen; Robert Martinez; Franklin Schlerman; Kenneth K Tanabe; Bryan C Fuchs; Peter Caravan Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Taofic Mounajjed; Harmeet Malhi; Douglas A Simonetto; Ruisi Wang; Liu Yang; Shennen A Mao; Jaime M Glorioso; Faysal M Elgilani; Christopher J Ward; Peter C Harris; Scott L Nyberg; Vijay H Shah; Richard L Ehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christian T Farrar; Eric M Gale; Richard Kennan; Ian Ramsay; Ricard Masia; Gunisha Arora; Kailyn Looby; Lan Wei; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Michelle M Bunzel; Chunlian Zhang; Yonghua Zhu; Taro E Akiyama; Michael Klimas; Shirly Pinto; Himashinie Diyabalanage; Kenneth K Tanabe; Valerie Humblet; Bryan C Fuchs; Peter Caravan Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 11.105