Literature DB >> 28039607

Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute.

Yolanda Quijano1, Emilio Vicente1, Benedetto Ielpo1, Hipolito Duran1, Eduardo Diaz1, Isabel Fabra1, Luis Malave1, Valentina Ferri1, Carlos Plaza1, Jan Lammel Lindemann1, Vito D'Andrea2, Riccardo Caruso3.   

Abstract

The use of robotic surgery in the hepatobilio-pancreatic (HBP) field is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection. A retrospective review of robotic pancreatic and liver resection was performed at Sanchinarro University hospital from October 2010 to April 2016. Since the beginning of the robotic program in our center, 22 hepatic procedures and 45 pancreatic robotic procedures have been performed. Of the 21 patients subjected to liver resection, 13 (65%) were for malignancy. There were two left hepatectomies, one right hepatectomy, one associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), three bisegmentectomies and three segmentectomies, eight wedge resections, and three pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 min. The overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7 and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range 4-64 days). Of the 45 patients subjected to pancreatic resection, 22 were male and 23 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years (range 31-82 years). The mean operating room (OR) time was 370 min (120-780 min). Among the procedures performed were 15 pancreatico-duodenectomies, 19 distal pancreatectomies, and 11 enucleations. All procedures in the HBP area were R0. Our early experience shows that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure in the HBP area. The complication and mortality rates are comparable to those of open surgery, but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreatectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28039607     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0663-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  31 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic liver resection--current update.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Current status of robotic liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Graziano Oldani; Lorenzo A Orci; Pietro E Majno; Gilles Mentha; Philippe Morel; Christian Toso
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.512

4.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study.

Authors:  Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato; Andrea Coratti; Luigi Bianco; Fabio Caniglia; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Puleo; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Arterial pseudoaneurysms following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: a single center experience.

Authors:  Benedetto Ielpo; Riccardo Caruso; Antonio Prestera; Giuseppe Massimiano De Luca; Hipolito Duran; Eduardo Diaz; Isabel Fabra; Sergio Olivares; Yolanda Quijano; Emilio Vicente
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2015-01-31

6.  Major venous resection during total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

8.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Systematic review of robotic liver resection.

Authors:  Cheng-Maw Ho; Go Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Nitta; Naoko Ito; Yasushi Hasegawa; Takeshi Takahara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Minimally Invasive Surgical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer: An International Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Yongjia Yan; Annie Yang; Li Lu; Zhicheng Zhao; Chuan Li; Weidong Li; Joseph Chao; Tong Liu; Yuman Fong; Weihua Fu; Yanghee Woo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.