Literature DB >> 28039517

Solvent-dehydrated dermal allograft (AXIS™) augmented cystocele repair: longitudinal results.

Saad Juma1, Omer A Raheem2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Surgical repair options for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) include native tissue, allograft, xenograft, and synthetic grafts. Solvent-dehydrated dermal allograft (SDDG) has an improved safety profile. We evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of SDDG use for cystocele repair.
METHODS: A total of 184 patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used pre and post operatively. Recurrent cystocele grade ≥ II and/or repeat cystocele repair were considered objective failure.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, 17 patients (10%) had grade IV cystocele, 87 (47%) grade III, 70 (38%) grade II, and 10 (5%) grade I. All patients underwent SDDG cystocele repair with/without vaginal sling and/or POP repair and/or hysterectomy. Mean hospital stay was 0.58 days (range 0-4), mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 111 mL, and mean length of Foley catheterization was 1.85 days (range 0-28). Postoperatively, 113 patients (64%) had no recurrent cystocele, 34 (19%) had grade I, 19 (11%) grade II, and 10 (6%) grade III cystocele. None had grade IV cystocele. Nineteen patients (10.3%) underwent repeat cystocele repair. Thirty-eight patients (21.6%) had postoperative recurrence (recurrent cystocele grade ≥ II and/or repeat cystocele repair). Dermal allograft related adverse events included 1 (0.5%) allograft vaginal exposure, dyspareunia 1 (0.5%), and transient hydronephrosis in 1 (0.5%). There were no vascular, vesical, visceral or neurological injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that SDDG augmented cystocele repair is a safe procedure, with low morbidity, and it's success is comparable to other techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Cystocele; Dermal; Repair

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28039517     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3245-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic organ prolapse: anterior, superior, and posterior vaginal segment defects.

Authors:  B L Shull
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States.

Authors:  L L Subak; L E Waetjen; S van den Eeden; D H Thom; E Vittinghoff; J S Brown
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Arcus-anchored acellular dermal graft compared to anterior colporrhaphy for stage II cystoceles and beyond.

Authors:  Sylvia M Botros; Peter K Sand; Jennifer L Beaumont; Yoram Abramov; Jay James Miller; Roger P Goldberg
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-17

5.  Sodium fluorescein use during intraoperative cystoscopy.

Authors:  Paula Jaye Doyle; Lioudmilla Lipetskaia; Erin Duecy; Gunhilde Buchsbaum; Ronald W Wood
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Linda Brubaker; Halina M Zyczynski; Geoffrey Cundiff; Holly Richter; Marie Gantz; Paul Fine; Shawn Menefee; Beri Ridgeway; Anthony Visco; Lauren Klein Warren; Min Zhang; Susan Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair.

Authors:  N Kohli; J R Miklos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-02-13

10.  Continued multicenter followup of cadaveric prolapse repair with sling.

Authors:  Kathleen C Kobashi; Gary E Leach; Joanna Chon; Fred E Govier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.