Literature DB >> 28038966

Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Mark D Girgis1, Mazen S Zenati2, Jennifer Steve3, David L Bartlett3, Amer Zureikat3, Herbert J Zeh3, Melissa E Hogg4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to evaluate the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD).
METHODS: A retrospective review of all pancreaticoduodenectomies from 9/2011 to 4/2015 was performed. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2.
RESULTS: Of 474 pancreaticoduodenectomies performed: RPD = 213 (45%) and OPD = 261 (55%). A total of 145 (31%) patients were obese (70 RPD, 75 OPD). Obese patients had increased EBL (p = 0.03), pancreatic fistula (B&C; p = 0.077), and wound infection (p = 0.068) compared to the non-obese. For obese patients, RPD had decreased OR time (p = 0.0003), EBL (p < 0.001), and wound infection (p = 0.001) with no difference in Clavien ≥3 complications, margins, LOS or 30-day mortality compared with OPD. In multivariate analysis, obesity was the strongest predictor of Clavien ≥3 (OR 1.6; p = 0.041) and wound infection if BMI > 35 (OR 2.6; p = 0.03). The robotic approach was protective of Clavien ≥3 (OR 0.6; p = 0.03) on univariate analysis and wound infection (OR 0.3; p < 0.001) and grade B/C pancreatic fistula (OR 0.34; p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients are at risk for increased postoperative complications regardless of approach. However, the robotic approach mitigates some of the increased complication rate, while preserving other perioperative outcomes. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28038966     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  13 in total

1.  How I Do It: Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sushruta S Nagarkatti; Amit V Sastry; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best "Choice"? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Marco Ricciardiello; Francesco Minni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  [Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors].

Authors:  T Welsch; M Distler; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Impact of nutritional status on outcome of pancreatic resections for pancreatic cancer and periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Vittorio Grazio Perrone; Sara Iacopi; Gabriella Amorese; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Use of Video Review to Investigate Technical Factors That May Be Associated With Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jae Pil Jung; Mazen S Zenati; Mashaal Dhir; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Richard L Simmons; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Francesca Lombardo; Gianluca Bonitta; Piergiorgio Danelli; Davide Bona
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-12-14

8.  500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Joal D Beane; Mazen S Zenati; Amr I Al Abbas; Brian A Boone; A James Moser; David L Bartlett; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 9.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Jia-Fei Yan; Yu Pan; Ke Chen; He-Pan Zhu; Qi-Long Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.